Not a Mason. Some are okay. There are not as many as there was, but some control networks, both good and bad.
Most are obvious which are online, the rest are not online and chiefs of police, judges or politicians.
Some in the networks organize covert infiltrations without even knowing they've been directed to do so.
I just know major inconsistencies in position defining intent needs explaining. Covert cooperation to provide sensational distraction that sounds edgy or of rebellion keeps threads looking real, but experience detects a scripted dialog with roles.
The failures to apply reason in pursuit of claimed goals is a glaring inconsistency. Claiming to be against corrupt government and failing to recognize ways to stop if only lasts for so long, then it is all clearly false pretense.