DNC Chair Stands By Debate Schedule: We Don’t Want to ‘Tax’ Our Candidates 'Too Much'

timosman

Banned
Joined
Dec 28, 2011
Messages
29,090
DNC Chair Stands By Debate Schedule: We Don’t Want to ‘Tax’ Our Candidates 'Too Much'

http://www.mrctv.org/blog/dnc-chair...ates-because-we-don-t-want-tax-our-candidates

While Republican candidates geared up for the second round of GOP debates in Simi Valley, Calif. on Wednesday, protestors gathered outside of DNC headquarters in Washington, D.C. to demand that the Democratic Party sponsor more debates.

Outside the Reagan Library, visiting Simi Valley for the CNN GOP presidential primary debate, DNC Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz told MRCTV that she stands by the current schedule:

“We have six debates, and it’s a robust debate schedule,” she said, “one that will give our candidates an opportunity to showcase for our voters why they think they’re the best choice to be president of the United States.”
Schultz added that the DNC does not want to “tax” the Democratic presidential candidates “too much” during their respective campaigns.

“We want to make sure that we don’t tax them too much in terms of pulling them off the trail and so the feeling was that six debates was just the right amount,” she argued.
Democratic candidates Bernie Sanders and Martin O'Malley -- among other notable party members like House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi -- have voiced their support for the push to add debates, casting further speculation on Ms. Schultz's reluctance to amend the current schedule.

The Democratic Party has five candidates and six debates total. In contrast, the GOP has 15 candidates and 11 debates total -- 16 candidates prior to former Texas governor Rick Perry's decision to drop out of the race.

To hear Ms. Schultz's remarks, watch the MRCTV video below.

 
Debbie Wasserman-Schultz served as the co-chair of Hillary's 2008 campaign. This is her way of rigging the game for Hillary and keeping Sanders, O'Malley, Biden, and Webb from gaining any true momentum. It's a clear conflict of interest, and in a world where things were just and proper, she would immediately step down as Chairwoman of the DNC and allow someone less biased to take over.
 
Last edited:
What that means is they don't want their candidates to be thoroughly vetted by the media or the voters. That's what happened last time.
 
Wasserman-Schultz Speech Disrupted by Protesters Demanding More DNC Debates

http://www.mediaite.com/tv/wasserma...ted-by-protesters-demanding-more-dnc-debates/

DWS.jpg


As DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman-Schultz spoke at a big Democratic rally this morning, protesters disrupted her speech, demanding more debates.

The Democratic presidential candidates are only having six debates, something that’s been criticized by the party’s own candidates and two of the DNC’s own vice chairs. But Wasserman-Schultz has been very insistent that six debates is sufficient.

There was a protest outside DNC headquarters this week, and today, protesters shouted “We want debates!” as the DNC chair spoke.

Wasserman-Schultz fired back and told Democrats shouldn’t be wasting time on fighting over debates when they could be spending that time fighting Republicans instead.

Watch the video below, via C-SPAN:
 
Back
Top