Well put.
I would add that the same conflict is going on with the left. The mainstream left wants to pretend it's not as intolerant of diversity of thought -- and diversity of instinct -- as the radical left. Because they also don't want to do that with people they agree with 90% of the time, even though they're definitely the kookiest.
The left's racism is better disguised but more pernicious. They all claim to be Darwinian, but they're Creationists at heart. They seethe at the natives for not participating in the war between the sexes. Well, Darwin said that two separate populations of the same species will evolve differently if they're in radically different environments.
Old World women evolved through eight hundred generations during a time of, "Sure I denounce him, I told him not to criticize the King, didn't I? Take him away. By the way, love, don't you look fine wearing the King's uniform? Come back any time, dearie." That's the attitude that ensured survival in that tyranny.
New World women through those same eight hundred generations found that the biggest threat wasn't the Crown or the Church, it was that grizzly bear. They survived by having their men's backs all the way. Old World women can't stand to see a woman with New World instincts, women who actually get mad when their men are insulted. But that isn't racism. If you don't believe me, just ask the people who feel that way.
"They're just backwards. They aren't quite bright enough to understand the brainwashing the way us paleface bitches do." Yeah, honey. That's racism.
Dinesh put a (stupid in my opinion) question out there and I gave an answer. What's your answer to his question? Who do you think legitimized the racism he's now complaining about? Pray tell.
