C Chomsky Member Joined Nov 9, 2007 Messages 812 Feb 12, 2008 #21 janeuner said: Please stop making Digg submission threads on these forums. It makes you (and by proxy, me) look like a spammer and/or an idiot. Click to expand... I'm just trying to get the message out, if that makes me look like an idiot, so be it.
janeuner said: Please stop making Digg submission threads on these forums. It makes you (and by proxy, me) look like a spammer and/or an idiot. Click to expand... I'm just trying to get the message out, if that makes me look like an idiot, so be it.
T The Tao Of Bill Banned Joined Nov 20, 2007 Messages 361 Feb 12, 2008 #23 Evazan said: Please stop putting Ron Paul's name in titles. That is the recipe for failure. I agree with the other poster. Wait until we have an official date and then we must post a digg that advertises this as a restore the constitution march. Click to expand... I didn't submit anything. I just asked people to digg a new submission.
Evazan said: Please stop putting Ron Paul's name in titles. That is the recipe for failure. I agree with the other poster. Wait until we have an official date and then we must post a digg that advertises this as a restore the constitution march. Click to expand... I didn't submit anything. I just asked people to digg a new submission.
C Chomsky Member Joined Nov 9, 2007 Messages 812 Feb 12, 2008 #25 Royksopp said: If you digg one thing today, MAKE IT THIS! Click to expand... oh so true!
B billjarrett Member Joined Nov 4, 2007 Messages 836 Feb 12, 2008 #26 Poor little thread, dumped to page two of a subforum. We're supposed to make this big, and we can't even get more than 244 Diggs? I thought we owned Digg.
Poor little thread, dumped to page two of a subforum. We're supposed to make this big, and we can't even get more than 244 Diggs? I thought we owned Digg.
C Chomsky Member Joined Nov 9, 2007 Messages 812 Feb 12, 2008 #27 billjarrett said: Poor little thread, dumped to page two of a subforum. We're supposed to make this big, and we can't even get more than 244 Diggs? I thought we owned Digg. Click to expand... LOL, but seriously the least we can do is expose digg's bias by getting 500 diggs in 24 hours
billjarrett said: Poor little thread, dumped to page two of a subforum. We're supposed to make this big, and we can't even get more than 244 Diggs? I thought we owned Digg. Click to expand... LOL, but seriously the least we can do is expose digg's bias by getting 500 diggs in 24 hours