Digg.com changed it's algorithm so that it's top stories are more diversified and get more interest from a more general audience.
http://blog.digg.com/?p=106
That's bad news for Ron Paul stories on digg (as well as Apple, Scientology etc...). My argument is that the number of diggs should decide on the top stories because just as a thousand people can digg a story 1000 more can bury it. I just wanted to rant because it pisses me off.... If they don't fix it they can go fuck themselves...

http://blog.digg.com/?p=106
That's bad news for Ron Paul stories on digg (as well as Apple, Scientology etc...). My argument is that the number of diggs should decide on the top stories because just as a thousand people can digg a story 1000 more can bury it. I just wanted to rant because it pisses me off.... If they don't fix it they can go fuck themselves...
