I've posted this elsewhere, I'll post it here as well. It is a response to Thomas_Payne's (aka Wes and Laura Lounsbury) post here:
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?p=1000411#post1000411
This post might be confusing for those who do not know that Thomas_Paine is both Wes and Laura Lounsbury, who slandered my girlfriend and I without merit, here (and elsewhere, I understand):
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=88830
Here are the people in question (Wes and Laura are on the left of the picture -- notice Russell on the Right has a Halo, that's because he's cool)
Here is the beginning of my side of the story, here:
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=89651
Roxi has also posted a blog with her version of the events here:
http://tulsatonewhampshire.blogspot.com
This latest post has driven me to complete my argument, and disclose my version of some relevant OLFD NH events.
As to the specifics of the post to which I am replying, I can agree with the sentiment that the canvassing strategy lacked adequate training and logistical execution. However, Thomas_Payne aka Wes and Laura Loonsbury 's post is hypocritical and counter-productive:
our main trouble was getting enough canvassing packets prepared by HQ to keep us going.
HQ informed me that Wes did not complete the canvassing packets He was given, yet clamored for more and derided individuals employed by the campaign for not having as many as he wanted. I was told that the campaign learned early on that they did not want to give packets to Wes Lounsbury, as they would not be consistently completed or returned to the campaign.
When we did not have enough walk lists we did blanket canvassing
Wes encouraged others to drop official canvassing entirely in favor of this 'blanket canvassing' that he invented out of thin air a few days before the primary. Horrible idea, spawned by his contempt for the campaign's official strategy.
Roxi and I were forced to waste valuable time and energy redirecting focus of volunteers to the official strategy. (Even with the flaws in logistics, if we had all gotten behind it from the start and focused ONLY on that, I believe we would have fared much better. The campaign staffers were entirely consistent in urging us to all focus on GOTV and only GOTV.)
We also did 6-8 coordinated sign waves, which not only generated major media attention (ABC, Union Leader, Guardian Ect, Washington Post, New York Times) but we also distributed 100's of yard signs at these events.
Laura never came to a single sign wave, to my knowledge. Wes came to some of them. At times he would tell someone that they should stand somewhere else, or wave their sign differently.
The idea for giving out the yard signs during sign waves came from Hunter, a person who lived at the hampton house. This is the house that the Lounsbury's are claiming had only 'frat parties' in it.
Most volunteers worked 8-12 hrs a day at least 6 days a week (sometimes longer when you included the commute to Concord or Manchester (at least an hour each way). We also did business canvassing and gave numerous media interviews.
The two times I know of that Laura talked to the media, she told them that OLFD was moving to New Hampshire to VOTE for Ron Paul. A hit piece ensued in 'The Hill' newspaper.
Roxi, my girlfriend, whom Wes and Laura greeted with unfounded slander, came up with a business canvassing project that paralleled the official GOTV effort and had forms made to execute it in an organized fashion in early December. Wes and Laura showed no interest, except to take the forms and never return them to her for processing. The one time I heard of Wes canvassing businesses, he placed signs on private property and the police were called. The campaign called Roxi, whom they knew to be a person who takes care of business, and asked her to speak with Wes about it. He denied that he was there at all.
Not to mention the fact that we distributed almost 13,000 U.S. Constitutions and nearly 14,000 DVDS!.
When the DVD's arrived in the mail, Wes and Laura let them sit at the Hampton house for over 3 weeks - but us drunks at the Hampton house handed many out in the meantime. I would be VERY surprised if they all got handed out in New Hampshire. I suspect there is a box on it's way to Vegas with the Lounsbury's right now.
There was a similar situation with magnetic bumper stickers that they hoarded because they wanted to make sure they got at least $4 apiece for them. The cost to them, if I recall, was just under $1. Wes was unwilling to sell me 100 for $200 (he suggested I make my own), so they sat underneath a chair for weeks. I respected Wes's private property, and he was selfish about it.
Therefore, the campaign suffered.
We had a lot of trouble with the staff following through on commitments, showing up on time and being consistent with a plan.
From what I saw, this would be a good way to describe how the campaign felt about Wes and Laura Lounsbury, except for the part about showing up on time. They were there EARLY to begin fucking up the operation. They showed up to rent a house before OLFD was properly organized, and encouraged anyone to come, whether they had money or not:
(source:
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=30089) Our plan is to rent large houses and fit as many Paul-unteers into each one as possible. Air mattresses, foam mats, whatever it takes. These houses will be placed in different areas of the state as home bases for the volunteers that stay there. We will go out in pairs, 6 days a week, morning til evening, door to door, spreading the freedom message, until Dr. Paul has enough votes to win NH. Some people will only be able to come for a week, some an entire month like our family. Our goal is to get things set up so that volunteers from all over the country can pay their airfare and just show up. They'll have a place to sleep and a designated precinct and partner to go door to door with. (Obviously those capable will be paying their portion of the living expenses, rent, food, etc. We want funds available for those unable to contribute but willing to dedicate their time wholeheartedly.)
However, after people arrived, they were asked by the Lounsbury's to cough up as much as $100 per week in 'rent' for the privelege of staying with them in the house they chose to rent with their own money. Roxi and I were one of the few staying there who were able to do so, but we were pestered to give more, even though we did not have it to give, they knew it, and we had told them that would be the situation when we arrived.
The claim that the campaign did not have a consistent strategy is utter bullshit. The campaign's strategy was always consistent -- it was that the strong personalities and independent minds of the grassroots had trouble accepting that the age-old strategy (GOTV) was a good one. Some of us lowered our heads and did it anyway, some of us spouted negativity about it, and some of us chose to decentralize and do something on our own that we were either more passionate about, thought might work better, or better fit our personal strengths. Wes chose to bitch to the campaign about their role in the strategy, and he is still doing so on this thread. I will say that it appears Wes went out every day and canvassed, as he was usually gone before I was awake. I cannot attest to any substantial amount of packets he may have turned in, or the quality of his encounters with people door to door. His performance on the phones, as you will soon see, leads me to believe it may not have been very productive.
As far as where we have hidden the canvassing records, and GOTV records, please go ask the campaign, they received our finished canvassing packets and had data entry people enter the info onto a computer. Surprisingly enough many of the canvassing packets did NOT have a cover sheet to explain what universal symbols to use when filling out the voters feedback, which resulted in a lot of confusion and numerous basically worthless packets The data entry volunteers simply couldn't understand the esoteric symbols of the volunteer's markings on the canvassing packets. The workload added by this confusion could have been easily avoided if there had been the least thought toward organizational logic regarding the canvassing. We did the best we could under the circumstances and made every effort to accurately explain to new volunteers the concept of canvassing and how to record the voters opinion ect.
I can agree with this for the most part. The packets were not constructed in an entirely logical way. I did do data entry, however, and did not find any packet to be worthless. However, I got my hands on some Obama packets that were left at a bar late in the campaign, and the way they assembled theirs were very similar. It seems to me that diagramming/mapping a canvassing project is simply a logistically difficult situation, both in the designing phase and during the canvassing itself.
It appears to me that Wes saw the difficulty in working from the packets provided, threw his hands in the air and said, "well then, fuck the campaign." This attitude was reflected through his consistent contempt for all staffers and his eventual online slander of them. I also saw that other folks who lived in the two Rye houses had more contempt for the official staff than the average OLFD-er, and can only assume it was Wes's influence. The feeling was mutual -- campaign staffers consistently preferred communication through Roxi to either of the Lounsbury's.
As a house captain I did my best to insure that in our 2 Rye houses, every person who came and volunteered through OLFD understood that we were coming together to get Ron Paul elected through 3 main activities: 1.) Target and Blanket Canvassing (explaining how each name on the list was a likely voter, which made this aspect of the campaign of the highest importance.
2.)Phone Banking. Earlier in the campaign they used the list of Likely Republican and Independent voters for volunteers doing cold calls, basically asking them IF they were going to vote and for WHOM. 3.)Sign Waving/Outreach
1. As far as I can tell, Wes invented blanket canvassing out of thin air a few days before the primary. It consisted of going to every door, as opposed to targeting known voters. Roxi spent more time than she should have had to talking people who lived with Wes out of doing it, advising folks to stick with the official strategy.
2. Laura did not phone bank once, to my knowledge. I heard Wes phone bank -- and he in fact made phone banking a priority, even though he was intentionally horrible at it. He sounded more like a robot than the machine recordings from the campaign -- no enthusiasm whatsoever. He sounded like a comedian making fun of people who read from teleprompters. He refused any advice to give more effort to reach the HUMAN on the other end of the telephone.
I felt that the Robocalls really hurt the campaign.
I couldn't agree more, but that's because 'Robocalling' is what I've been calling Wes's phone banking strategy.
The calls should have been performed by a professional call center. The Campaign had plenty of money to farm those calls out to paid HUMANS not the repugnant bots which did more harm than good.
At 23 years old, Wes apparently feels that he can spend the campaign's money better than they can. To his defense, there's alot of that going around. Everyone's an expert. Not everyone decides to spout negativity about people who are trying their best, however.
The campaign had HUNDREDS OF FREE VOLUNTEERS to do the phone banking. They chose to spend the money elsewhere, and I agree with the decision.
I talked to WAY TOO many New Hampshirites who told me straight out, "I will not vote for Ron Paul because of his annoying and excessive robo calls"
I tried to get Wes to confirm this claim with the script that was being used in these calls to upset voters and the caller ID that came up on their phones. We needed to know where these calls were coming from, since he was claiming that some people reported receiving them after midnight. We were afraid there might be a serious error in the campaign's software, or worse, that annoying calls were being made intentionally in Ron Paul's name. But curiously, Wes never verified the existence of these NH'ites that he says were upset with the RoboCalls. He was the only canvasser I could find that claimed that they existed. I tried to get to the bottom of this problem as soon as he reported it, but he did not cooperate with intel about the source of these calls. The campaign did, however, follow up with me by offering the script that was being used and at what times the calls were being made by the official campaign.
That said, I don't like the idea of machines calling folks, and I wouldn't be a bit surprised if the ones made were not top notch. One thing to understand is that NH gets inundated with calls from ALL the campaigns, and some folks get shit sick of it. Some people would just say that they are not voting for your candidate because you, and the calls, are still bothering them.
You say regarding the OLFD project, "I do believe it was poorly conceived and poorly executed." I have to say, How in the hell would your know either way? You obviously don't have a clue as to what actually transpired ON THE GROUND in New Hampshire,
I was there, and Slevin is right. It is only constructive criticism. I thought more organizing/planning was necessary throughout the operation, but the one time I invited Wes to sit down and plan/organize he popped a beer and proceeded to derail the effort by shouting about irrelevant issues and getting up and going into another room in the middle of conversations. My feeling was that he was trying to intentionally pester me while I was trying to regain focus.
Thomas_Payne blows up and appeals to emotion here:
you obviously have never spent much time in the Concord HQ office, you obviously should not being making this vicious attack on one of our best accomplishments as an online/offline community. These volunteers were passionate and dedicated men and women from every background and belief system, across America and the WORLD (we had volunteers from Canada, Panama, Spain and yes....Estonia!).
Let's not start sucking each other's dicks just yet. We all know that, by virtue of the fact that we were willing to travel to NH for RP, that we are dedicated and passionate. It has little relevance on the argument he tries to make here. The truth is that we can all learn from what mistakes were made, if we can identify areas of potential improvement without choosing to come out spouting venom. I choose to do so toward the Lounsburys, as they have shown themselves to uniquely deserve it.
Yes we did have some drama and laziness
Drama: The campaign coming to me and asking me to reign in Wes, as the police had contacted them and given his name as the source of the problem of disrespecting private property with signs and flyers on windshields.
Laziness: Volunteers calling from home and saying 'Laura never returned my email -- do you guys still need volunteers?'
you said, "That so many who were a part of it now speak hatefully toward the campaign, and do so on a public board, shows a complete lack of understanding about how to win voters over."
NO.....we speak HONESTLY and PASSIONATELY about very serious problems that threatens the viability of Dr. Paul's candidacy. You haven't even volunteered in New Hampshire and yet you spout out slanders, then claim that OLFD volunteers 'speak hatefully'.
You insinuate that slandering is wrong, and that you haven't spoken hatefully. That's a slap in the face to Roxi and I. Slander and hateful speech is about all that I have seen you do well.
we must not be what Thomas Paine called, "sunshine patriots." His words strike true today as much as they did some 230 years ago when Thomas Paine wrote to the Revolution weary Americans, "These are the times that try men's souls. The summer soldier and the sunshine patriot will, in this crisis, shrink from the service of their country; but he that stands now, deserves the love and thanks of man and woman. Tyranny, like hell, is not easily conquered; yet we have this consolation with us, that the harder the conflict, the more glorious the triumph."
It seems you have taken this quote to mean that it should be your goal to create more conflict, in an attempt to achieve a more glorious triumph.
Pointing the finger at volunteer groups instead of listening to the people who were actually THERE, is NOT acceptable, I don't care how long you've been in the freedom movement.
He did not point his finger at OLFD, only at you, to suggest that perhaps you should look no further than yourself. I tend to agree. Furthermore, you have pointed your finger at me, Mr. and Mrs. Pain. And I was there. You didn't listen to the people who were there telling you that Meg was responsible for trashing your house, not me. You didn't care about the pictures we have of the condition in which we left the house. You didn't listen to the campaign staff and the police, who urged you to quit putting signs randomly on businesses and windshields. You didn't listen to those who urged you to either change the way you phone banked, or to get off the phones entirely. It is you who should learn to listen, or get out of the way.
Whether you are inept or intentionally trying to derail this movement, does not matter. You are a scourge upon it.
Two other tidbits that show a little bit about the Lounsbury's:
1. The morning of the tea party, Laura called Roxi to inquire as to whether our car would make it out of the driveway, as it had snowed the night before. Roxi told her that we would have no problem, and that we in fact had already gotten the car out of the driveway. We packed up to go, and were pulling out of the driveway when Jim Forsythe showed up. He informed us that Laura had asked him to drive 45 minutes out of his way to pick us up. We ended up riding with Jim to the Tea Party. After the speeches were over, we marched to the harbor and dumped tea (The Lounsbury's were nowhere to be found.) We then went back to the Green Dragon, a bar where we heard the rest of the RP supporters had gone. Wes and Laura were there, and Wes was drinking.
Laura informed us that she had told Jim Forsythe to go ahead and go home, and that we were to get a ride from someone else entirely -- someone we had never met before, and never saw again.
Luckily Jim had not yet left, as we had personal items in his car, but Laura volunteered Roxi to walk the half mile through the snow to get the stuff out of the car before Jim left, as Laura wanted to avoid the trouble of Jim trying to find us in downtown Boston.
2. Early on, when we first arrived, Wes was describing to me how he felt about New Hampshire voters. Direct quote from Wes: "No, seriously! These people are like Cattle! You have to steer them into your camp!"
As far as I'm concerned, case closed. On to your regularly scheduled programming.