doctor jones
Member
- Joined
- Mar 1, 2010
- Messages
- 465
I agree -- being born into a Democratic family and just being a cheerleader you can be sympathetic to.
DEVASTATING Web Page about Rick Perry!
- Thread starter sofia
- Start date
I agree -- being born into a Democratic family and just being a cheerleader you can be sympathetic to.
Fatejuggler
Member
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2011
- Messages
- 54
The cheerleader part is important. Something like that really sticks in a person's mind. I guarantee that is the one part everyone person who reads the page will remember. It is relevant because it illustrates that the macho cowboy image he so vigorously promotes is largely stagecraft.
I would however suggest losing the line "In 1984, the pretty cheerleader..." The "pretty cheerleader" part is over the top and makes it seem more like an unfair attack rather than just pointing out a simple fact.
Change "The liberal Democrat college cheerleader cleverly..." to just "The liberal Democrat cleverly..."
To avoid seeming like criticizing him for who his parents were I would change "Born into a Democrat Family, Perry..." to "Originally a Democrat, Perry..."
On the grades section I would suggest adding the words "including a D in economics" to the end. That makes the significance of it far more obvious.
The Bilderberg connection MarcNY mentioned would be a good addition.
I definitely agree it should be separated from Ron Paul's name. You can get a free web site with its own URL for whatever you want at sites.google.com. It takes only a couple of minutes. The URL will look like hxxp://sites.google.com/site/[whatever]. I think you may be able to associate a custom domain with it later if you want (not sure though.)
I would however suggest losing the line "In 1984, the pretty cheerleader..." The "pretty cheerleader" part is over the top and makes it seem more like an unfair attack rather than just pointing out a simple fact.
Change "The liberal Democrat college cheerleader cleverly..." to just "The liberal Democrat cleverly..."
To avoid seeming like criticizing him for who his parents were I would change "Born into a Democrat Family, Perry..." to "Originally a Democrat, Perry..."
On the grades section I would suggest adding the words "including a D in economics" to the end. That makes the significance of it far more obvious.
The Bilderberg connection MarcNY mentioned would be a good addition.
I definitely agree it should be separated from Ron Paul's name. You can get a free web site with its own URL for whatever you want at sites.google.com. It takes only a couple of minutes. The URL will look like hxxp://sites.google.com/site/[whatever]. I think you may be able to associate a custom domain with it later if you want (not sure though.)
Last edited:
A person who cheerleads isn't a "sissy", or "unmanly." That's gender policing. Just drop it. There's plenty of other stuff, and we're barely scratching the surface here.
In 1986, as a member of the Texas House, Rick Perry accidentally sent videos with naked people to all of the high schools in his district for use in a drug resistance program. He appointed Ken Lay to the Public Utilities Commission one day before Lay gave him $25,000, which Perry called a "coincidence." We've got plenty of legitimate material and don't need to use the old cheerleader smear, which didn't work against Bush anyway.
In 1986, as a member of the Texas House, Rick Perry accidentally sent videos with naked people to all of the high schools in his district for use in a drug resistance program. He appointed Ken Lay to the Public Utilities Commission one day before Lay gave him $25,000, which Perry called a "coincidence." We've got plenty of legitimate material and don't need to use the old cheerleader smear, which didn't work against Bush anyway.
jmdrake
Member
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2007
- Messages
- 51,987
+rep! scaryrickperry.info is available.
RoyalShock
Member
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2007
- Messages
- 562
I agree about removing the cheerleader stuff. The people you want to convince will dismiss it right away when they read that. Also, you absolutely do NOT want to go the "fake Christian" route. Christians will also dismiss the entire piece. If you want to use all the public prayer as a negative, do it carefully without calling it fake or insincere.
sofia
Banned
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2009
- Messages
- 3,485
Citations will be added...
as for the cheerleader part, I felt it was important to leave that in as a contrast to his phony "cowboy" schtick. Im not so much making fun of male cheerleaders as I am the transformation of Perry's image.
Also, if site stands alone as an anti-Perry site....without Ron Paul stuff on it ....then all we accomplsih is killing Perry votes without giving an alternative. Why should this negative info be used to help Bachman...or Romney?
as for the cheerleader part, I felt it was important to leave that in as a contrast to his phony "cowboy" schtick. Im not so much making fun of male cheerleaders as I am the transformation of Perry's image.
Also, if site stands alone as an anti-Perry site....without Ron Paul stuff on it ....then all we accomplsih is killing Perry votes without giving an alternative. Why should this negative info be used to help Bachman...or Romney?
Matthew5
Banned
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2011
- Messages
- 2,473
Ok, but you're missing a disclaimer denying any relation with the official Ron Paul campaign. I feel that's important, at least.
LibertyEagle
Paleoconservative
- Joined
- May 28, 2007
- Messages
- 52,730
You are assuming that by virtue of having Ron Paul in the name of your website, that it will encourage them to vote for him? Sorry, but that makes no sense.
Seriously, Max, Ron Paul wouldn't do this. Please do not associate him with this. I understand why you are putting out such a piece, but don't saddle RP with it. Please.
Last edited:
speciallyblend
Member
- Joined
- Aug 20, 2007
- Messages
- 20,351
i will not be spreading this crappy page. good luck i guess!! i want nothing to do with this crap!!
tfurrh
Member
- Joined
- Jun 30, 2011
- Messages
- 3,265
What I don't understand is how Rick Perry is getting the credit for the TX economy. The governorship of TX is one of the weakest offices in the nation, and most of his proposals have been blocked. Furthermore, the tax policies that have made TX boom were largely already in place before he took office.
Shouldn't small government, and limited exectutive power get the credit?
Shouldn't small government, and limited exectutive power get the credit?
erowe1
Member
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2007
- Messages
- 32,183
Why the negativity? Nobody said you had to spread this page.
It's good that the page exists for those who will use it. For some people it will be very effective. For others it won't.
erowe1
Member
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2007
- Messages
- 32,183
Ron Paul wants to make the presidency one of the weakest offices in the nation. And when he does, I hope he gets due credit for the boon to the economy that brings.
I know that's not what you meant. And I agree that Perry doesn't deserve any credit.
erowe1
Member
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2007
- Messages
- 32,183
The problem with the Ron Paul stuff is that it will turn people off to both Perry and Paul. We don't want that to happen.
tfurrh
Member
- Joined
- Jun 30, 2011
- Messages
- 3,265
erowe1
Member
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2007
- Messages
- 32,183
I somehow totally missed that line.
Eleutheros
Member
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2007
- Messages
- 184
I think the OP is reinventing the wheel
I understand and appreciate what the OP is attempting to do, but IMO he is reinventing the wheel, as there already is a source that highlights Perrys blunders and gaffes, and we should be directing people there (or at least referencing it as a major source):
Politifact.com; more to the point, this link here:
http://www.politifact.com/texas/article/2011/aug/13/truth-o-meter-rick-perry/
I think this site does more for revealing truths and gaffes in an objective manner than what any other site possibly could.
I will be referring would-be voters to this site instead. Again, I appreciate and understand what the OP is trying to do, but it would do the RP campaign a major disservice in the long run because the bias is just too obvious.
Just my $17.76.
I understand and appreciate what the OP is attempting to do, but IMO he is reinventing the wheel, as there already is a source that highlights Perrys blunders and gaffes, and we should be directing people there (or at least referencing it as a major source):
Politifact.com; more to the point, this link here:
http://www.politifact.com/texas/article/2011/aug/13/truth-o-meter-rick-perry/
I think this site does more for revealing truths and gaffes in an objective manner than what any other site possibly could.
I will be referring would-be voters to this site instead. Again, I appreciate and understand what the OP is trying to do, but it would do the RP campaign a major disservice in the long run because the bias is just too obvious.
Just my $17.76.
Similar threads
