R.Paul 1207 gotta happen
Member
- Joined
- Sep 8, 2009
- Messages
- 72
Despite an official unemployment rate of 27 percent, the real jobs problem in Detroit may be affecting half of the working-age population, thousands of whom either can't find a job or are working fewer hours than they want.
Using a broader definition of unemployment, as much as 45 percent of the labor force has been affected by the downturn.
And that doesn't include those who gave up the job search more than a year ago, a number that could exceed 100,000 potential workers alone.
"It's a big number, and we should be concerned about it whether it's one in two or something less than that," said George Fulton, a University of Michigan economist who helps craft economic forecasts for the state.
Mayor Dave Bing recently raised eyebrows when he said what many already suspected: that the city's official unemployment rate was as believable as Santa Claus. In Washington for a jobs forum earlier this month, he estimated it was "closer to 50 percent."
Although the government doesn't produce an unemployment number that high, it's not hard to get close.
Officially, the unemployment rate in Detroit was estimated at 27 percent in October. But that number does not include people working part-time who want full-time work, nor does it include "discouraged" workers, who have stopped looking for work. It also doesn't include people who have gone back to school rather than search for a job.
The Bureau of Labor Statistics estimated that for the year that ended in September, Michigan's official unemployment rate was 12.6 percent. Using the broadest definition of unemployment, the state unemployment rate was 20.9 percent, or 66 percent higher than the official rate. Since Detroit's official rate for October was 27 percent, that broader rate pushes the city's rate to as high as 44.8 percent.
What should be done? Let the market decide what jobs Detroit should or should not have and let those who cannot find work leave or starve? Should the government come in and spend more money there to try to create jobs?
http://detnews.com/article/20091216...arly-half-of-Detroit-s-workers-are-unemployed
If you are not looking for work (discouraged workers who gave up looking for a job or those who simply don't want a job in the first place for whatever reason) should you be considered unemployed?
If you have a job but wish you had more hours should you be considered unemployed?
If you have a job but wish you made more money, should you be considered unemployed?
These people are not counted in official unemployment statistics.
If the government got out of the way, jobs would come back to Detroit. The problem in Detroit is too much regulation, too many taxes, too high taxes, and ineffective services. You try to run a business when you're buried in regulatory paperwork, you pay a multitude of taxes that take a huge bite out of your profits, and you can't even get the cops within a short notice when someone vandalizes your shop.
I think the fact that the city has basically turned into a shithole that nobody wants to live in is now a bigger problem than gov't regulation and taxes. If Detroit suddenly said "No Business Taxes for One Year" would corporations flock to Detroit? I say no because the city is so far into disrepair already that few would want to live there. Sure they would get some "corporate offices" popping up (a single phone, computer, filing cabinet and local registered agent but that's it) for tax purposes. The city wouldn't have any money to invest into rebuilding infrastructure and private industry wouldn't do it either. The city is just too far gone now for lower taxes and lower regulations to make much of a difference. This is ignoring the offshoring of so many manufacturing jobs that are not coming back that a city like Detroit used to rely on. What would be their new market???
Sounds like a struggling, directionless workforce ripe for an agorist revolution.
Put them all to work shutting down regulatory red-tape and chasing away tax collectors, thus paving way for an era of economic growth.