Dept of Agriculture Orders Submachine Guns with 30 Round Magazines

Probably right , so 100 meters .

If you know what you are doing, you can deal with a 40" drop at 200yds.

drops40sw.jpg


And 235 ft/lbs is plenty of energy left, so if your sight has drop comps then you can hit as far as 300.
 
If you know what you are doing, you can deal with a 40" drop at 200yds.

drops40sw.jpg


And 235 ft/lbs is plenty of energy left, so if your sight has drop comps then you can hit as far as 300.
Time to get my buddies reloading press fired up .I would hate for a national treasure as I am to be attacked by the lowlife dept of ag, lol
 
From the USDA site:

14138938735_3a21a2cff8.jpg


U.S. Forest Service law enforcement officer Carson Harris and his K-9 partner, Jasper, patrol the Shasta-Trinity National Forest in California. (U.S. Forest Service)
 
Most of the meth labs are in national forest land. Then again, there shouldn't be 'national forest land' so....
 
Dept of Ag , not just purveyors of food stamps anymore .....

That's what I was thinking. Since 90% of the farm bill is food stamps maybe they're gearing up against those whom use food stamps rather than the 10% who farm.
 
I had no idea that Ag. Dept. jobs were so dangerous that that much firepower was required. What have they been using up until now?
 
These gov-mental, un-Constitutional willful actions (machine guns for usda) are completely insane.

WTF are they thinking?
 
Most of the meth labs are in national forest land. Then again, there shouldn't be 'national forest land' so....

And there shouldn't be gangs growing pot or cooking meth out there. Points back to the war on drugs as the root of much evil.
 
Very easy...War on Us.

We are the enemy.

This is an occupied country.


And here "we" all sit, with information right at our fingertips and we do...nothing.

Boycotting the companies will do no good. They'll just stick to govt contracts. Hell, I fully expect state DMV's to start arming themselves soon.

An armed , violent response will only cement these agencies' "need" for such weapons.

Use the system a la Christopher A. Brown. Oh jeezus......

Talk about having a populous by the short and curlies, fuck me.

21axxt5.gif
 
It's the USDA... getting ready to bust those evil Raw Milk farmers and distributors. OR maybe after the BLM steals cattle, the USDA can kill and stamp their dead carcasses?
General Information

Notice Type: Sources Sought

Posted Date: May 7, 2014

Response Date:May 09, 2014 3:00 pm Eastern

Archiving Policy: Automatic, on specified date

Archive Date: May 12, 2014

Original Set Aside:N/A

Set Aside:N/A

Classification Code: 10 -- Weapons

NAICS Code: 922 -- Justice, Public Order, and Safety Activities/922120 -- Police Protection


Contracting Office Address:
1400 Independence Ave., SW, Room 40-E J.L. Whitten Fed Bldg
Washington, District of Columbia 20250

Place of Performance: USDA, Office of Inspector General - Investigations
1400 Independence Avenue, SW
Washington, District of Columbia 20250
United States
Primary Point of Contact.:
Linda F. Josey,
Chief, Procurement Management Branch
[email protected]
Phone: 2027208337
 
Last edited:
It's for all those Raw Milk people who cross state lines (Amish Mafia) and those Farmer/Rancher Co-Ops who try to circumvent the unconstitutional laws.
 


Now the question is, why would there need to be a civilian security force that is as powerful as the military?

The only answer I can think of is that it would be because the military is precluded by the Constitution, from fighting against the civilians. A civilian army wouldn't be hindered by the constitution, but would be very unconstitutional.
 


Now the question is, why would there need to be a civilian security force that is as powerful as the military?

The only answer I can think of is that it would be because the military is precluded by the Constitution, from fighting against the civilians. A civilian army wouldn't be hindered by the constitution, but would be very unconstitutional.


Or, might be worried that the military will be on our side.
 
An armed , violent response will only cement these agencies' "need" for such weapons.[/IMG]

An armed response need not be violent.

And, out of all those bad choices you listed, it is the best of a bad lot.

Bundy Ranch, repeated 1000 times a day.

By the short hairs is right, and it hurts now that Theye are starting to really pull on them.
 
Back
Top