Alright, here is the video I have. Apologies it was just with my phone and I was on the balcony since I was only observing (only delegates were allowed on the floor).
Anyway, I started recording right after the chair said that "there was a group of folks committed to disrupting the caucus, just like in 2008". This then went into the whole "point of order" segment. I didn't catch everything Kenny mentions, but it hits the highlights. And is definitely more informative than that biased article posted earlier. Note that at some point, we do actually hear someone specifically state the reason for the point of order: we wanted a 1 hr lunch. This is broken up into 2 segments (part 1: 0-10 mins, part 2: 10-~18 mins, no particular reason) since Youtube has a 15 min restriction on HD video, and I didn't transcode:
Part 1:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hcbiVmTqY9A
Part 2:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5m_B9Uxxp2Y
The third video is the reading of the rules. Again, I didn't catch the start but I wanted to catch the absurdity of the situation. Notice how they slow down at the end when describing the reasons they can eject any one from the meeting. Maybe that's all they wanted us to hear?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bSb4PBQbp_E
Enjoy!