Democrats unveil "Transgender Bill of Rights"

They don't even need any Bills, they are already flooding the futures brains.
not even in Key West. lived there 16 years.

Kids day is on Sunday..and Fantasy Fest is an Adult Party..

Rare for folks to bring kids.. and it is advertised as an adult party.

Kids there grow with some tolerance. without pressure.
 
Last edited:
I really didn't care that much about transgenders before the last few years.
Now? Screw them and this "Bill of Rights."

They are abominations, plain and simple. They are mentally ill people trying to harm our children. Can't cut it any other way given the evidence out there.
 
I really didn't care that much about transgenders before the last few years.
Now? Screw them and this "Bill of Rights."

They are abominations, plain and simple. They are mentally ill people trying to harm our children. Can't cut it any other way given the evidence out there.

The trans freaks serve dual purposes, they most certainly are pushing extremely hard to normalize pre pubescent pedophilia, and they also serve as yet another Marxist mind fuck...



That is not an insane fat man in a dress with chemically enhanced tits.

That is a woman, and you will address her and think of her and acknowledge her as that, under penalty of law.
 
I was well aware of that as well.

WTF do you think is going on?

Something $#@!y is afoot.

There are three possibilities that come to mind.

1) It's just an odd coincidence.

2) 4D chess in our favor. Lull the libs into a false sense of security by Roberts and Gorsuch acting like "swing voters" until the GOP could get in a solid 6-3 majority who's rulings could survive even if a conservative judge retired.

3) 4D chess against everybody where rulings are designed to fuel the culture war. Conservative Christians are mad the LGBTQ has become the new black and liberals are mad because Roe v Wade is overturned. Build up a powder keg and wait for the match.
 
The trans freaks serve dual purposes, they most certainly are pushing extremely hard to normalize pre pubescent pedophilia, and they also serve as yet another Marxist mind $#@!...



That is not an insane fat man in a dress with chemically enhanced tits.

That is a woman, and you will address her and think of her and acknowledge her as that, under penalty of law.

Everyone needs to see this. And she's worth subscribing to.

 
There are three possibilities that come to mind.

1) It's just an odd coincidence.

2) 4D chess in our favor. Lull the libs into a false sense of security by Roberts and Gorsuch acting like "swing voters" until the GOP could get in a solid 6-3 majority who's rulings could survive even if a conservative judge retired.

3) 4D chess against everybody where rulings are designed to fuel the culture war. Conservative Christians are mad the LGBTQ has become the new black and liberals are mad because Roe v Wade is overturned. Build up a powder keg and wait for the match.

Pretty much #3.

All of this hate & blame is to take our eyes off TPTB who want that explosion.
 
Pretty much #3.

All of this hate & blame is to take our eyes off TPTB who want that explosion.

Yeah. The world is headed for mass starvation because of neocon/neolib policies and instead people are consumed with cultural politics.
 
Anything to distract us from our pockets being picked.

On that note, is Congress capable of passing any kind of legislation, other than naming a post office, that doesn't have "invest in" (aka spending money) provisions in it? Of course the answer is no because they have no interest in legislating for the sake of being good civil servants. That's a waste of time for them. They're only interested in how they can loot the Treasury a little bit more by positioning donors, family and friends to be the beneficiaries of those "investments".

So tired of Congress.... :sorrow:

Pretty much #3.

All of this hate & blame is to take our eyes off TPTB who want that explosion.

#4 - agenda 2030 "carbon reduction" aka depop
 
Last edited:
Trans Rights are what they have been telling white people they have had for years; WHITE PRIVILEGE.

But this CAN NOT BE A RIGHT.

A Right only exists if EVERYONE can have that same freedom. You can have NO MORE FREEDOM than that which you are willing to give to others.

This is EXCLUSIVE, which means they want to EXCLUDE EVERYONE ELSE, thus, it CAN NOT BE A RIGHT.
 
(h/t Seth Dillon via Not the Bee)

Going by @Anti Federalist's "five years" rule, we've got about four years or so left before we start seeing this here:

Women prisoners who call transgender inmates ‘he’ or ‘him’ face extra jail time
Under equality rules, offenders who use terms deemed ‘threatening, abusive or insulting’ could have additional days added to their sentence
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/20...all-transgender-inmates-face-extra-jail-time/
Charles Hymas (08 October 2021)

Women prisoners who call transgender inmates by the wrong pronoun could face extra time in jail under equality rules, says a justice minister.

Female inmates who deliberately call a transgender woman “he” or “him” could be punished under rules barring “threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour”.

The penalties will be decided by an independent adjudicator, a visiting judge, who has the power to impose additional days if they feel the abuse merits such a punishment.

The disclosure comes amid a growing debate over the policy of holding male-to-female transgender prisoners in women’s jails.

This summer, the High Court rejected a legal challenge to prevent transgender inmates with convictions for sexual or violent offences against women being imprisoned alongside other women.

In 2019, there were 11 transgender women who were still legally male detained at the 12 women’s prisons in England and Wales.

Aggravating factors

Asked about the policy on the words allowed for transgender inmates, Lord Wolfson, the justice minister, said: “Incidents where a prisoner uses incorrect pronouns for another prisoner will be considered on a case-by-case basis, in line with the prisoner discipline procedures policy and the prison rules.

“Prisoners may sometimes make an honest mistake in relation to pronouns and disciplinary action would not usually be appropriate in those circumstances.

“However, if an officer deems it appropriate to place a prisoner on report, the rule against ‘using threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour’ – Prison Rule 51(20) – may apply. The adjudicator will weigh each incident on its own merits.

“The policy stipulates that an offence motivated by another person’s protected characteristic(s) under the Equality Act 2010 is an aggravating factor and may merit referral to an Independent Adjudicator.”

The most severe punishment available

Official guidelines state that disciplinary cases are normally heard by a prison governor, and are only referred to an Independent Adjudicator where there is the possibility of days being added on to the sentence - which is the most severe punishment available.

Under Prison Service policy, any prisoner who has legally changed their gender, and been granted a Gender Recognition Certificate (GRC) to prove it, will automatically be sent to a jail appropriate to their new gender.

A prisoner who identifies as the opposite sex but does not have a GRC will initially go to a prison for their old, legally-recognised gender, but may later move after an assessment of their case.

Lord Wolfson added: “The Ministry of Justice and Her Majesty’s Prison and Probation Service are committed to advancing equality, eliminating discrimination, harassment and victimisation.

“As part of this, we ensure that all prisoners are treated fairly and in a way that respects their rights, and encourage them to act in a way that is respectful and considerate of others.”

A Ministry of Justice spokesman said: "We are required under the provisions of the Equality Act to prevent discrimination against people with protected characteristics.”

//
 
Back
Top