Democrats Introduce Bill To End Death Penalty For Treason…

I can only think of two reasons for them bringing this up now.

One is to try and gain some advantage in extradition cases like Edward Snowden.

The other is they know we are on to them and it may be an attempt to weasel out of trouble.
 
As much as I hate to say this, because I believe in an eye for an eye, I don't believe the Federal Government should have the power to condemn someone to death. I trust very few people in government.
 
I can only think of two reasons for them bringing this up now.

One is to try and gain some advantage in extradition cases like Edward Snowden.

The other is they know we are on to them and it may be an attempt to weasel out of trouble.

I believe it is this! I know a lot of people here are "down on it". But I have been following the forged birth certificate investigation very closely for a long time. I believe that the whole ball of wax in that arena is about to explode. I totally believe they are on to him being a Saudi plant. I totally believe that the shit that is hitting the fan in Egypt is bringing to light a lot and people are paying attention.
Btw, just out of curiosity...... has anyone examined the sheriff's kits that were put together? Has anyone looked at the affidavit that was put together by Zullo that was handed to the Alabama Supreme Court in the current case?
 
Going to war with America as an American citizen is a crime worthy of death, just because the system gets it wrong often does not mean people should not get a fair punishment.

YES SIR!
The Continental Army committed treason by going to war against Britain and seceding. Therefore George Washington, the Continental Army, and everyone involved in the Revolution should've been executed. :rolleyes:
 
I'm fine with the constitution, and the execution of those politicians who do not uphold their oath. Without the sword hanging by a horses hair, there's nothing but indulgence for these people. Where's the incentive, otherwise? These people are not honorable.

Power should not come without risk, and as far as I can tell, there are not too many penalties defined in the constitution, for defying the constitution.

Damocles-WestallPC20080120-8842A.jpg
 
Last edited:
The necessary and proper clause means authorization for military use

So then apparently you'd be okay with congress authorizing our military to use force against certain behaviors...Does this only apply to citizens of foreign nations?

Which behaviors would you be good with our military attacking in your name?
 
Planning?

It's been a bipartisan orgy of treason for most of my life...

They just write new mandates authorizing their behavior.
 
Could the Dems be saying that treason is OK?

I'm very rarely surprised by anything from the looney left.
 
Back
Top