Democratic Super PAC hits Rand Paul with “Back to the Nineties” ad

[Rudeman]

The fact that the Dems (especially those that are close to Hillary) felt the need to respond to Rand's attacks on Bill shows they've been having an impact. They wouldn't have wasted time and money if it didn't.

 

[devil21]

Of course in retaliation (as many anticipated) the left websites are starting to bring up the newsletters and whether they are fair game against Rand. I won't link to the write-up but it's "media-ite". Should at least be entertaining watching the media spend a lot of time talking about the people that ARE NOT running for office in 2016. Bill Clinton v. Ron Paul 2016?

 

[anaconda]

Remember, Rand has stated that he only mentioned it because the interviewer asked him.

 

[eleganz]

It is funny because the left is so desperate to combat Rand's comments on Clinton, they dug up some pseudo ammunition on how much "Rand hates women"....oh dear lord...

 

[Dianne]

Too funny !!! Hillary is not going to run, btw .. The threat of her running is a diversion, unless Bush's New World Order has the election in the bag.. In my view, no way the U.S. going to elect a female President for the first time in history especially a washed up 70 something year old Lesbian or is married to an admitted rapist .. Does this broad really want their past to come out? Those two already executed so many people... do they really want these investigations to resurface?

My prediction right now... No Hillary run .. media having fun with it, but not going to happen.

 

[Saint Vitus]

self-deleted. Didn't want the Rand cry-babies tattle-telling to the mods.

 

[Petar]

It's funny how Rand doesn't ever say anything negative about GWB. I would much prefer a president to get a blow job in the oval office than murder 1 million innocent Iraqis.

Is it more important that Rand Paul amuses you or that he pisses off Dems and makes himself more likely to get the Republican nomination?

 

[Warlord]

self-deleted. Didn't want the Rand cry-babies tattle-telling to the mods.

If you dont like the forum then leave and stop being a troll

 

[juleswin]

Is it more important that Rand Paul amuses you or that he pisses off Dems and makes himself more likely to get the Republican nomination?

Its awesome that you captured that post so I can see it, but people should remember why all this is being brought up. And that is as a way to counter the silly war on women by republicans that democrats wont stop talking about. He bring up Clinton the democrats idol to show that even though he is predators to women, the pro women party still adores him.

 

[trey4sports]

lol, that was scathing! They basically just gave Rand a million new eyeballs

 

[GunnyFreedom]

Dunno, I have pretty fond memories of the 90s. They might not want to remind people how bad things have gotten since then.

That's what I'm saying. This is really stupid on their part. If I were Rand, I would roll around with snapshots of how wonderful the 90's were compared to today, and re-frame the debate by embracing the attack and folding it back on them.

 

[Crashland]

That's what I'm saying. This is really stupid on their part. If I were Rand, I would roll around with snapshots of how wonderful the 90's were compared to today, and re-frame the debate by embracing the attack and folding it back on them.

A lot of options for knocking that ad down. Rand could turn it on its head by going on about how much better off we'd be today if we could go back to the 90s and get a do-over on some of those failed anti-freedom policies.

 

[philipped]

The fact that the Dems (especially those that are close to Hillary) felt the need to respond to Rand's attacks on Bill shows they've been having an impact. They wouldn't have wasted time and money if it didn't.

Yep, watch out guys!

 

[devil21]

A lot of options for knocking that ad down. Rand could turn it on its head by going on about how much better off we'd be today if we could go back to the 90s and get a do-over on some of those failed anti-freedom policies.

I don't think Rand should bother responding to it. It's hack stuff. Just trying to bait him.

 

[Valli6]

Bill Clinton was much worse than people remember!

They sure don't mind bringing up Ron Paul newsletters from the 80s.

I believe they were from the early to mid 90's, and I feel that Rand may have kept this issue in mind throughout his references to Clinton's past. I know I did!

Nine or ten distasteful passages from an old newsletter - passages which Ron Paul obviously did not write but has apologized for a hundred times - well that really just pales in comparison to dozens of sexual assaults and rapes. The mythology they've built around the newsletter story is much worse than the newsletters themselves. Some accusers seem unaware that the newsletters were actually about monetary policy, finances, freedom and gold - that the issue of race was never even a topic of discussion, much less the main focus of them.

It's funny how Rand doesn't ever say anything negative about GWB. I would much prefer a president to get a blow job in the oval office than murder 1 million innocent Iraqis.

Do you think that Clinton never killed any Iraqis?
Rand has talked about the damage done during Bush's administration - particularly the fact that no one was fired or held accountable for 9/11.

Frankly, Clinton is lucky if people stick to discussing his blow job. It keeps them from remembering that;

He sold US satellite technology to the chinese government for campaign money (5/23/98) http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1998/05/23/clinton.china/index.html?_s=PM:ALLPOLITICS
http://www.cnn.com/US/9905/25/cox.report.highlights/index.html?_s=PM:US

He attacked other countries without congressional approval -
contrary to the Constitution and the War Powers Act (no imminent threat).
This is what Ron Paul wanted him impeached for! No wonder they hate the Pauls so much!
(00:21 - 3:04) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eKD0YzJ4h5k#t=0m21s

And who remembers that Clinton started the hysteria over Iraq having weapons of mass destruction?!
http://www.c-span.org/video/?116547-1/military-strikes-iraq
Madeline Albright on why it was necessary for Clinton to attack Iraq 12/16/98
http://www.c-span.org/video/?116699-1/military-action-iraq

When you look back and examine the facts, it's incredible how bad Clinton really was!
Did Bush's policies inspire the attacks of 9/11?
or (as Ron Paul warned!) was it Clinton's actions at the end of the 90's?

Did George Bush ensure this mess in the middle-east?
Or was he just continuing Clinton's policies, as Obama continues Bush's policies now?

 

[Rudeman]

Pretty sure GWB isn't going to run in 2016 and he's barely involved with politics so what would be the point of attacking him? Just for the hell of it? Bill Clinton is actively campaigning, Hillary is the likely Dem nominee so Bill is going to be a huge factor in the 2014 races as well as 2016.

 

[philipped]

No such thing as bad press.

 

[VoluntaryAmerican]

Just saying that I did not approve their use of my photo in their ad.

What's the context of the picture. He's laughing about?

No such thing as bad press.

Tell that to Richard Nixon.

 

[Saint Vitus]

Pretty sure GWB isn't going to run in 2016 and he's barely involved with politics so what would be the point of attacking him? Just for the hell of it? Bill Clinton is actively campaigning, Hillary is the likely Dem nominee so Bill is going to be a huge factor in the 2014 races as well as 2016.

The Bush family crime syndicate are not still actively campaigning for multiple offices? That's news to me. How absolute ridiculous, that Rand Paul is still harping on Bill Clinton getting a blow job. Of all the things that Rand weasels out on taking a stand against, this is what his strategy is? Good lord. What a joke.

 

[menciusmoldbug]

Rand Paul is still harping on Bill Clinton getting a blow job. Of all the things that Rand weasels out on taking a stand against, this is what his strategy is? Good lord. What a joke.

Bill Clinton raped multiple women and paid almost a million dollars to settle a sexual harassment lawsuit. To say that "getting a blow job" is the worst of his crimes simply isn't accurate. Because I can't imagine that you are actively seeking to trivialize rape, I will give you the benefit of the doubt and assume that you are just embarrassingly ignorant about the subject you've chosen to discuss. Read more, post less.