Democrat Phil Hare: I don't worry about the Constitution...

[idirtify]

1. Conjecture
2. Conjecture

This is a forum primarily made of conjecture, as is most conversation. I was merely stating my opinion based on personal experience. You trying to tear apart arguments based on conjecture isn't really all that worthwhile.

I believe, and still believe, this video will turn away more people due to the tact. If you disagree with that, cool, but your argumentative opposition to conjecture is energy misplaced.

Your low post count suggests you may not be aware of this, but disagreeing with other’s opinions is what happens here multiple times daily. The fact that they are opinions does not devalue the disagreements. Far from it! In fact, if anything is “misplaced” it is your backward “opinion” of this process. Somehow you have managed to base your criticism of my disagreement on the fallibility of your opinion. That’s not only spin, that’s backwards spin. Even being a newbie does not excuse reversing such elemental basics of discussion.

You may believe that this video will turn away more people, but my disagreement has shown why your belief is less reasonable (than believing that it will positively influence more people). Note that even in the world of conjecture, there is relative merit.

 

[phazespace]

Your low post count suggests you may not be aware of this, but disagreeing with other’s opinions is what happens here multiple times daily. The fact that they are opinions does not devalue the disagreements. Far from it! In fact, if anything is “misplaced” it is your backward “opinion” of this process. Somehow you have managed to base your criticism of my disagreement on the fallibility of your opinion. That’s not only spin, that’s backwards spin. Even being a newbie does not excuse reversing such elemental basics of discussion.

You may believe that this video will turn away more people, but my disagreement has shown why your belief is less reasonable (than believing that it will positively influence more people). Note that even in the world of conjecture, there is relative merit.

post count is no indication of ones understanding of what happens here. People can lurk and post very infrequently or lurk and never post. does that make their understanding of what goes on here any less? doubtful.

I never said my opinions devalue our disagreements. I said my opinions were conjecture not subject to your logical discourse due to the fact that they cannot be proven one way or another. my beliefs is not reasonable at all, that's why they're called beliefs, opinions, conjecture, etc. To string them together and say I'm formulating an argument, then proceed to tear it appart is a waste of time...

... as is this thread now.


Feel free to PM me if feel like discussing that aspect further.

I understand your opinion on the video's influence, I just disagree with it.

 

[idirtify]

post count is no indication of ones understanding of what happens here. People can lurk and post very infrequently or lurk and never post. does that make their understanding of what goes on here any less? doubtful.

I never said my opinions devalue our disagreements. I said my opinions were conjecture not subject to your logical discourse due to the fact that they cannot be proven one way or another. my beliefs is not reasonable at all, that's why they're called beliefs, opinions, conjecture, etc. To string them together and say I'm formulating an argument, then proceed to tear it appart is a waste of time...

... as is this thread now.


Feel free to PM me if feel like discussing that aspect further.

I understand your opinion on the video's influence, I just disagree with it.

I’ll decline your offer to continue via PM. I wanna see how long you try to continue with your backward logic in public – and dig your hole deeper. Regarding your post count, I was only guessing at why you would resort to such backward logic as a basis for your criticism of my disagreement. Now you have rejected the excuse I offered you.

I know what you said, and now you have only reworded the same thing. Your conjectured opinions are certainly subject to my logical discourse; and far from immunizing them from comparative analysis, the improvable part makes them MORE vulnerable. If you really think that a conjectured opinion can not be disputed with logic and proven to have less merit than another conjectured opinion, then you have a LOT to learn about standard intellectual discussion.

 

[JoshLowry]

i’ll decline your offer to continue via pm.

ಠ_ಠ