Deleted from Wikipedia--G. Edward Griffin!

IPSecure

Member
Joined
Jan 16, 2008
Messages
3,709
Deleted from Wikipedia--G. Edward Griffin!
http://www.dailypaul.com/node/39638

I've just spent an hour reviewing the (voluminous) deletion history (link below) of G. Edward Griffin's Wikipedia entry.

Six (6) different editors entered a "Delete"...ON THE SAME DAY !

These were not ordinary persons - 2 of them are Administrators, and 4 others are either admittedly trying to become admins, or else have achieved a higher 'Editor' status, with extra powers.
One of them performed 4,000 edits in the past 12 days - that person must spend every waking hour on Wiki !!

It is truly amazing the extent that certain specially self-anointed busybodies on that site go to, to extinguish 'unsavory' items, particularly since the very same people not only allow, but personally espouse unsupported &/or radical ideas themselves on their own pages.

The major repeated claim against against Griffins' continued entry on Wikipedia is :
-that he is "not notable FOR ANYTHING",
-that there is no 3rd party verification source.
-that he is a conspiracy theorist.

Griffin is someone who has several books on Amazon,
has an IMDB listing, produced numerous films dating back to the '60s,
& a comprehensive website with copious amounts of well-edited & researched data.

His videos/audios (on the topic of the Federal Reserve & banking) have superb narrative & are very clearly & thoroughly laid out -
At once easy to absorb for those new to the topic, and yet still incisive & comprehensive enough for those well-versed in the subject.

I have ZERO Idea how to 'work' Wikipedia, but surely some on this forum do - if you haven't yet, please spend several minutes watching just one of his youtube videos - and if you agree, please make an effort to restore his Wiki entry.

If it is not already clear, he is a supporter of Dr. Paul, and his analyses provided in his videos are a great entry point for those who are seeking to learn more details about the financial subjects Dr. Paul often references.

This is really, truly, an outrage.....

Link to private Wiki 'editor' page (where 2 editors smugly agree to themselves to KILL any possible re-creation of this page, and glad that they wont have to deal with that page ever again!) : (it is at bottom)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Excirial

Final Deletion page Link (with extensive comments):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/G._Edward_Griffin_(2nd_nomination)
 
Look what they did to Irwin Schiff's book...if you buy it...they have to report you to the IRS because the info in the book is so damning to the IRS....true martyr for the cause.
 
This is the first year in a long time that I didn't donate to Wikipedia, and it is precisely because of nonsense like this.
 
And yet, most on this forum quote liberally from it, giving it some kind of whiff of credibility.
 
And yet, most on this forum quote liberally from it, giving it some kind of whiff of credibility.

Wikipedia articles quote their sources (which is why you should not quote wikipedia, but its not the worst thing in the world), if they don't, they get deleted. Wikipedia is not a monolithic entity we can hate either, thousands of people contribute to Wikipedia with their expertise.
 
I am reserving judgement. Wikipedia has always been very good about free speech (to my knowledge), so I will await more information before making a decision. Until then, they get the benefit of the doubt.
 
I am reserving judgement. Wikipedia has always been very good about free speech (to my knowledge), so I will await more information before making a decision. Until then, they get the benefit of the doubt.

you have got to be kidding. Griffin is a strong supporter of Paul and this is so blatently obvious......

Have you watched "Fiat Empire?" look, I know you think truthers are wacko but Griffin is much more than 9/11 conspiracies.
 
In his weekly newsletter Griffin said:

"My listing in Wikipedia is being considered for deletion because some readers have labeled me a conspiracy theorist and a promoter of quack cancer cures. These people undoubtedly are well intentioned but suffering from a severecase of knowledge deficiency. If you are inclined, please go to the Wikipedia web site and enter a statement of support. Hopefully, there will be enough of these to offset the voices of ignorance. "

http://www.realityzone.com/currentperiod.html
 
I'm really torn on Wikipedia. On one hand, their political bias REALLY pisses me off. On the other hand, it's still the best site on the Internet, at least the one I spend the most time on.

So, a while ago, I decided to stop contributing to it, not even to fix typos and vandalism I come across on daily basis. It was a hard habit to break, so I got my account banned by renaming the "List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming" article to "List of scientists opposing the Global Warming hoax". ;)

Their loss.
 
I don't see how Wikipedia can justify this deletion. Griffin is most certainly a lot more notable than many of the dopes that are featured on Wikipedia. He has authored and published over a dozen books, some of which are relatively well-known. If Porky Pig deserves a page on Wikipedia then Griffin certainly does.

Also, one of the reasons they cite for deletion is that he is an alleged "conspiracy theorist". If that is a reason for removal then why do Jeff Rense, Alex Jones, Michael Tsarion and Jimmy Walter all have pages when they are supposedly also considered conspiracy theorists?

Bah! Wikipedia has now lost most of my respect for allowing its administrators this kind of censorship power.
 
Back
Top