Debbie Wasserman Schultz ‘Still Waiting’ to Know: ‘Would Rand Paul Let a Woman Die?’

[orenbus]

Debbie Wasserman Schultz ‘Still Waiting’ to Know: ‘Would Rand Paul Let a Woman Die?’

The Rand Paul vs. Debbie Wasserman Schultz battle continued Monday morning.

The pair have exchanged a series of jabs over abortion rights since the U.S. Senator from Kentucky announced his Republican presidential candidacy.

Last Wednesday, Sen. Paul challenged the media to ask the Democratic National Committee chairwoman if she thinks “killing a 7-pound baby that’s just not born yet” is okay. Wasserman Schultz replied that she supports a woman’s right to choose and then took stabs at the senator’s recent reputation for feisty interviews with women hosts. A few days later, she continued the battle by telling MSNBC that Sen. Paul’s repeated question about a 7-pound baby was a deflection from the real issues.

And on Tuesday, the DNC chair appeared on CNN’s Wolf and further elaborated upon her beef with the senator:

We have very different definitions of personal liberty. I made that clear in my response the Democratic Party’s position is we are pro-choice. We believe a decision on a woman’s reproductive choices is best left between a woman and her doctor and I am still waiting for Rand Paul to say whether or not he supporting exceptions when a woman is raped, going to force a woman to carry a baby to term and not allow her to make that choice? When she’s the victim of rape, the victim of incest? Are we going to let a woman die? Would Rand Paul let a woman die because she’s carrying a baby or is he going to let mer make that choice with her doctor? We’re waiting on that but Rand Paul’s first day out of the gate as a candidate for president was spent not talking about the issues that matter the most to Americans — the economy, jobs, and helping people reach the middle class — but debating me on abortion.

mediaite.com/tv/debbie-wasserman-schultz-still-waiting-to-know-would-rand-paul-let-a-woman-die/

 

[Suzanimal]

When she’s the victim of rape, the victim of incest? Are we going to let a woman die?

Umm...the woman survived the rape and incest. The only one dying in her scenario is the baby.

 

[specsaregood]

Umm...the woman survived the rape and incest. The only one dying in her scenario is the baby.

I'm still wondering what this whole incest thing is about? Is this really a problem where many adult siblings are banging and getting knocked up and needing an abortion?

 

[hells_unicorn]

I'm still wondering what this whole incest thing is about? Is this really a problem where many adult siblings are banging and getting knocked up and needing an abortion?

There were several noted cases of Left-leaning ideologues have relations with their own family (David Epstein in particular), so I think this may be what Schultz is getting at, progressive daddies doing wrong things with their daughters. Granted, most people who support aborting babies don't see a problem with what Epstein was accused of doing, since almost nobody to the left of Rush Limbaugh even brings it up anymore despite his continual influence on Democratic politics.

 

[Sola_Fide]

We have very different definitions of personal liberty.*

Yeah, your definition includes aggression against innocent people. These evil people are the butchers of life.

Watch Ron Paul's 08 Ames Straw Poll speech for the pro-life definition of liberty.

 

[eleganz]

Wow she handled that terribly, it just seems like she was trying really hard to remember the flash cards/talking points that her DNC aides provided her.

 

[specsaregood]

There were several noted cases of Left-leaning ideologues have relations with their own family (David Epstein in particular), so I think this may be what Schultz is getting at, progressive daddies doing wrong things with their daughters. Granted, most people who support aborting babies don't see a problem with what Epstein was accused of doing, since almost nobody to the left of Rush Limbaugh even brings it up anymore despite his continual influence on Democratic politics.

Daughters that are adults? Its sick shit; but I don't see why they should get a special right to kill babies just because they are sick perverts.

 

[jct74]

Debbie will be on Fox News - The Kelly File tonight, probably to talk more about this.

Tonight DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz on the field of 2016 presidential candidates. Plus GOP presidential candidate Marco Rubio speaks out

http://www.foxnews.com/shows/the-kelly-file.html

 

[Austin]

She's likely referring to a situation in which an abortion is necessary to save the life of the mother due to abnormal fetal development.

 

[muh_roads]

I always wonder how much the welfare and food stamp system would explode if we forced everyone to carry from conception.

You think people on black friday are animals now? The robberies and theft start hitting closer to home when the entitlement class runs amok and the money/jobs run out. Imagine 2 generations from now if we had the state force everyone tomorrow to take it all the way to the end. I know concern about overpopulation is a eugenics thing...but there is some valid concern that goes along with it if you have a halfway decent imagination of how future events can unfold.

Abortion and poor life choices naturally reduces themselves when economic times are better for people. Economics is our strongest winning argument and it always will be. I still prefer Ron's approach by talking about money.

 

[Sola_Fide]

She's likely referring to a situation in which an abortion is necessary to save the life of the mother due to abnormal fetal development.

No she isn't.

 

[AuH20]

I always wonder how much the welfare and food stamp system would explode if we forced everyone to carry from conception.

You think people on black friday are animals now? The robberies and theft start hitting closer to home when the entitlement class runs amok. Imagine 2 generations from now if we had the state force everyone tomorrow to take it all the way to the end. I know concern about overpopulation is a eugenics thing...but there is some valid concern that goes along with it if you have a halfway decent imagination of how future events can unfold.

Abortion and poor life choices naturally reduces itself when economic times are better for people. Economics is our strongest winning argument and it always will be. I still prefer Ron's approach by talking about money.

That's exactly why we need to get rid of those programs. The government once again created this mess.

 

[muh_roads]

That's exactly why we need to get rid of those programs. The government once again created this mess.

The only thing that turns them back on after being flipped off is a policy change. Until you fix the money system, the poverty would grow at an exponential rate and the economic illiterate bleeding hearts will always win. Because Social Security Part 2 & 'murica.

 

[jmdrake]

I always wonder how much the welfare and food stamp system would explode if we forced everyone to carry from conception.

You think people on black friday are animals now? The robberies and theft start hitting closer to home when the entitlement class runs amok and the money/jobs run out. Imagine 2 generations from now if we had the state force everyone tomorrow to take it all the way to the end. I know concern about overpopulation is a eugenics thing...but there is some valid concern that goes along with it if you have a halfway decent imagination of how future events can unfold.

Abortion and poor life choices naturally reduces themselves when economic times are better for people. Economics is our strongest winning argument and it always will be. I still prefer Ron's approach by talking about money.

When my dad was a child having a big family wasn't a problem even if you were "poor." His dad was a sharecropper. The kids worked the farm. Children were an asset, not a liability. In fact my granddad had to stop sharecropping when his last son went off to the army. Generations later farm subsidies that allowed for megaculture and the death of the small farmer, mass urbanization underwritten by the "great society", and child labor laws have moved children from the asset column to the expense column. The idea is that you don't let the kids work, or learn anything really useful, then if you're doing "good" you spend a bunch of money on them going to college and/or they go into debt and they become a tax unit for the government and the parents get nothing out of their investment but a good feeling.