Kludge
Member
- Joined
- Dec 21, 2007
- Messages
- 21,719
ah yes another ron paul supporter attempts to change the subject. Democrats do not love che,but at least they do not slander there opponents in order to gain support.

ah yes another ron paul supporter attempts to change the subject. Democrats do not love che,but at least they do not slander there opponents in order to gain support.
If giving Rosa Parks a gold medal is inherently unconstitutional, then why would Ron Paul (falsely) offer to chip in his own funds? Is Ron Paul a fan of donating to unconstitutional causes, or does he realize that his claims on constitutionality are bullshit? And don't say, 'it's unconstitutional because it uses taxpayer dollars,' because it didn't.
yeah But congressional medals are not tax payer funded.
If giving Rosa Parks a gold medal is inherently unconstitutional, then why would Ron Paul (falsely) offer to chip in his own funds? Is Ron Paul a fan of donating to unconstitutional causes, or does he realize that his claims on constitutionality are bullshit? And don't say, 'it's unconstitutional because it uses taxpayer dollars,' because it didn't.
It seems karl is ignoring the posts that destroy his assertions and moves on to some other minute detail to argue about. That's not "debating" karl, that's trolling. How about you address my post on page 6?
I think the government should also send flowers to women who lose their children. They should start a Public Department of Floristry. Maybe they could also send balloons to anyone who loses a tooth. And we could have congressional platinum trophies for the winner of American Idle! These are all great ideas. Thanks for shining a light on this karl marx. I never realized how cool it would be for our federal government to do all these things.
Hell, maybe they could send birthday presents to my parents when I forget to buy them something.
ah[sic] yes [sic] another ron paul[sic] supporter attempts to change the subject. Democrats do not love che,[sic]but at least they do not slander there [sic] opponents in order to gain support.
Comrade, I proved above that tax dollars DO IN FACT pay for the medal.
Comrade, I proved above that tax dollars DO IN FACT pay for the medal.
Did YOU read the bill?
Did you read the bill?
Funded through the sales of replicas,and secondly the US mint is self funded.
http://www.usmint.gov/about_the_mint/
Since Congress created the United States Mint on April 2, 1792, it has grown tremendously. The United States Mint receives more than $1 billion in annual revenues. As a self-funded agency, the United States Mint turns revenues beyond its operating expenses over to the General Fund of the Treasury.
The United States Mint applies world-class business practices in
making, selling, and protecting our Nation’s coinage and assets.
— U.S. Mint Strategic Plan
Did you read the bill?
Funded through the sales of replicas,and secondly the US mint is self funded.
http://www.usmint.gov/about_the_mint/
Since Congress created the United States Mint on April 2, 1792, it has grown tremendously. The United States Mint receives more than $1 billion in annual revenues. As a self-funded agency, the United States Mint turns revenues beyond its operating expenses over to the General Fund of the Treasury.
The United States Mint applies world-class business practices in
making, selling, and protecting our Nation’s coinage and assets.
— U.S. Mint Strategic Plan
That's their hope, but Ron was factually correct when he stated taxpayer dollars paid for it - hence your entire argument is intellectually void.
You god/government education didn't do much for your intellectual development, and knowing the definition of what a PUBLIC TRUST is.
Your cut n' paste from the US Mint is irrelevant to HR 573. So the mint makes money. Swell. I hope we got our money back.