He looked totally unprepared for the Osama Bin Laden assassination question. Who prepares him for these things? The best way to answer that question IMO
is to point out that OBL had been reduced to a powerless figurehead. By assassinating him in the way we did in a secret mission without the permission of
Pakistan only hurt our standing in the Middle East and will only embolden more terrorists. We should have cooperated with Pakistan to capture him alive and
try him. Of course, bringing up the
complete truth - that OBL had nothing to do with 911 is beyond the scope of most voters. In light of this he should just concentrate on what was actually
accomplished by killing him in such a way - instead he stuttered and stammered his way through. I was a bad moment in the debate. He needs to be better
prepared for such a question.
is to point out that OBL had been reduced to a powerless figurehead. By assassinating him in the way we did in a secret mission without the permission of
Pakistan only hurt our standing in the Middle East and will only embolden more terrorists. We should have cooperated with Pakistan to capture him alive and
try him. Of course, bringing up the
complete truth - that OBL had nothing to do with 911 is beyond the scope of most voters. In light of this he should just concentrate on what was actually
accomplished by killing him in such a way - instead he stuttered and stammered his way through. I was a bad moment in the debate. He needs to be better
prepared for such a question.