David Wilcock Responds to 'The Obama Deception'

[TER]

The Middle East / Order of Assassins faction...
This group has historically cooperated with the New World Order and the Illuminati to varying degrees, and for a time had access to Looking Glass technology, allowing them a window into the future.

Uh. Yeah. Did I just read that the Muslims have a crystal ball?

 

[Kurt]

This group was very likely responsible for the recent airline disaster I wrote about, where two women met with Obama about re-opening 9/11 hearings, and their plane went down in flames a week later. No one in the anti-Obama conspiracy crowd has mentioned my article or realized this connection themselves, though it is very obvious that this was no ordinary plane crash.

On the contrary, Infowars.com reported about this and hinted at this connection.

9/11 Activist Who Sued Government Killed In Buffalo Plane Crash
http://www.infowars.com/911-activist-who-sued-government-killed-in-buffalo-plane-crash/

ASK THE QUESTIONS

Jones invites the viewers of his films to question his data and not accept it blindly, and I fully accept that invitation. When he says towards the end of "The Obama Deception" that Obama is "more of the same" and was ‘put in’ as a ‘puppet’ who will "serve and protect the international bankers," I must disagree.

I disagree not by mere opinion, but by the incredible thrust of news stories emerging every day, showing us how the old systems are being torn apart in real time. Once I have put all this data together in a short, summarized form it will be very impressive. At that point my critics will be relying more upon their beliefs than upon the actual data.

The old systems are being torn apart because of the engineered economic implosion perpetrated by the global bankers. Bush and Obama pushed for the bailouts and continued borrowing which put the nation in further deep debt. This is undeniably "more of the same". So what is Wilcock's point? I'll be waiting for his summary with all his data put together.

 

[politicsNproverbs]

Ha! That Griffin quote about the poker game was a hoot.

And with this next quote I agree 1,000% :

As much as there is that points to these various factions though, and I do believe they compete, I still think there is a single sharp point on the top of the pyramid.

And I would guess we would also agree as to who we think it is.

As for Wilcox, that was indeed interesting on the various "factions," but I doubt they are as "lame" as he is making them sound. They may be desperate about the "delays," yes -- anyone who walks in such darkness has to be -- but their global Atlantis occultic dream will come to pass eventually (short-lived as it will be).

On the contrary, I've heard -- maybe it was Svali? -- that these groups are VERY PATIENT about their goals, they've been slowing working them out for hundreds of years, and will not stop until they reach them.

As for Obama and them not wanting him to be prez, I don't buy that. Remember the Bilderberg meeting last year in VA, and how Obama and Hillary "disappeared" at the same time to the same neck of the woods? And then that very Monday, after the weekend of the Bilderberg mtg., the big announcement was made in the news that Hillary was acquiescing to Obama. Coincidence? I don't think so!

Wilcox sounds like an apologetic for Obama. So what's his true motive in that?

 

[newbitech]

I have read most of DW's stuff. I like him and he has some great insights channeled from RA. Lots of people won't dig his stuff because its "out there".

Check out a guy called Michael Tsarion. He does a much better job explaining ET's and has much much more background evidence. These factions are real, and there is much evidence that most of our (read human's) problems probably have something to do with outside intellegence fiddling with our DNA at early stages of evolution.

 

[Catatonic]

I have trouble taking anyone that references Benjamin Fulford as a legit source seriously.

I'm still waiting for his ninja army to take care of our NWO problem.

 

[mczerone]

Really?

This is junk, a misdirection.

It does not matter if there is one group that has power that wants to see a one world government that they can control or if there are 30 such groups. It doesn't matter if any of these groups are 'controlling' Obama akin to puppetry, only his actions matter - not his motivations. It doesn't matter if a group calls themselves a collection of researchers or a 'secret society', it only matters that they are trying to push the one world government. Secret societies are not evil; but even open societies that try to hijack power over the whole globe are.


And lastly, any 'secret technologies' would have either been lost to time or leaked to the internet by now. Nobody, anywhere, has a 'torsion power' generator or a 'looking glass' to the future. Even if there have been ET contacts (IMO, there haven't), there hasn't been any grand gift of technology, keeping that secret would be too much work and counter productive. Further, we wouldn't have half the problems that we do now, even if it wasn't specifically known (to the general public) how there was complete energy independence or how the Arabs were able to predict earthquakes.

You don't need to wear a tin-foil hat to believe in Liberty, there are enough objective facts and empirical data to make our points without resorting to claims of alien coverups, impossible technology, or malevolent secret societies. If you need to reference those typically derided points in an argument, you are not going to convince anyone of your other points.

 

[andrewh817]

Let his actions speak for themselves....... if you were president would you appoint members of organizations whose aspirations you disagreed with? But that's assuming he was given a choice in who to pick........ suppose these organizations donated to his campaign in exchange for inclusion in high-ranking positions in his cabinet.

 

[anaconda]

So, is Obama going to go "rogue?"

 

[Jodo]

Interesting article, but it's difficult to imagine that Obama is trying to undo the damage done by the NWO and Illuminati factions based on the actions he's taken so far. It certainly doesn't explain the reasoning for this: http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/sen.-rockefeller-endorses-obama-2008-02-29.html

It is true that Obama is ostensibly more willing to negotiate with other countries/factions but I don't yet see the influence the author refers to.

By the way, how do we tap the benign Asian secret societies to support a U.S. candidate for liberty like Ron Paul??

 

[tonesforjonesbones]

I stopped reading when I got to "Obama doens't have enough dirty laundry..." Larry Sinclair? Where's the Birth Certificate? tones

 

[Imperial]

Quote:
The Middle East / Order of Assassins faction...
This group has historically cooperated with the New World Order and the Illuminati to varying degrees, and for a time had access to Looking Glass technology, allowing them a window into the future.

Uh. Yeah. Did I just read that the Muslims have a crystal ball?

Epic win. I wanna join the order of assassins. Does this have connections to that sufi group from Mongol times that had the impregnable fortresses in the middle of nowhere for no reason? Arab assassins + crystal balls for the win!

 

[Pete]

Really?

This is junk, a misdirection.

It does not matter if there is one group that has power that wants to see a one world government that they can control or if there are 30 such groups. It doesn't matter if any of these groups are 'controlling' Obama akin to puppetry, only his actions matter - not his motivations. It doesn't matter if a group calls themselves a collection of researchers or a 'secret society', it only matters that they are trying to push the one world government. Secret societies are not evil; but even open societies that try to hijack power over the whole globe are.


And lastly, any 'secret technologies' would have either been lost to time or leaked to the internet by now. Nobody, anywhere, has a 'torsion power' generator or a 'looking glass' to the future. Even if there have been ET contacts (IMO, there haven't), there hasn't been any grand gift of technology, keeping that secret would be too much work and counter productive. Further, we wouldn't have half the problems that we do now, even if it wasn't specifically known (to the general public) how there was complete energy independence or how the Arabs were able to predict earthquakes.

You don't need to wear a tin-foil hat to believe in Liberty, there are enough objective facts and empirical data to make our points without resorting to claims of alien coverups, impossible technology, or malevolent secret societies. If you need to reference those typically derided points in an argument, you are not going to convince anyone of your other points.

This.

I admit that I find the tinfoil stuff very absorbing. I think there's a lot of truth in it, mixed in with the UFO and reptilian chaff. For example, here's a charge that JBS and CFR share common origins: http://watch.pair.com/jbs-cnp.html. I found this very interesting because, among other things, it may help explain why Reagan flipped like he did and why right wingers, with whom Ron Paul has so much in common, don't hardly give him the time of day. At the end of the day, though, I think sites like this are misdirecting. The misdirection may be innocent, i.e., in the pursuit of profits, or it may be disinformation.

Whatever is at the root of it, misdirection hurts our cause. I think it increases paranoia and fear, makes our opposition look more well-organized and powerful than they actually are, and associates us with the fringe, hurting our credibility. When I'm talking to my neighbors, the last things I'm going to bring up are Freemasonry or chemtrails, as this information is totally useless, even if it may true to some extent.

I think Ron Paul is the consummate anti-collectivist, steering his way around CNN, FOX news, AJ, JBS, etc., without being coopted by them. He just sticks to the Constitution (while always allowing that it can be changed) and to classical economics, which even the Keynesians must nod to. Peter Schiff is much the same way. These are the examples we should follow, appealing to wisdom and common sense. In fact, as a result of this discussion, I am going to lay off even ridiculing the White House, and just stick to arguing ideas in a noninflammatory way.

 

[amonasro]

The Illuminati had believed in Hillary’s victory strongly enough to write in a woman president to this year’s episodes of "24." They also put in a very strong death threat against Obama by having an African-American president who was then assassinated on the show, prior to the female president taking office. Is it any wonder Obama didn’t offer Hillary the vice-presidential slot, but gave her a position to quell the opposition?

This group does have a certain amount of ET-derived technologies and treaties with negative ETs such as the Annunaki, but have far less use and development of these technologies than the rival New World Order faction.

The Twin Towers could not have been brought down with so little remaining debris, at free-fall speed, without the advanced technologies this group has at work — including the conventional demolition tools as well as mini-nkes and top-secret disintegration beam capabilities to destroy the support columns and vaporize all the concrete into dust, which in turn blanketed the entire city and was unfortunately radio-active.

Does the author know who wrote those episodes of 24 and their motives for including a black/woman president, or is he just making an educated guess based on information he believes to be true? 24 has multiple writers. Are they all in on it?

ET-derived technologies? Top-secret disintegration beam capabilities? Seriously? Do you realize how ridiculous this sounds?

How can the author prove any of these statements beyond a reasonable doubt? Faulty logic: This is where the conspiracies fall apart for me, and can be viewed as nothing more than entertainment.