Darwin Unhinged: The Bugs in Evolution

[Kade]

"Third, evolutionists are obsessed by Christianity and Creationism, with which they imagine themselves to be in mortal combat. This is peculiar to them. Note that other sciences, such as astronomy and geology, even archaeology, are equally threatened by the notion that the world was created in 4004 BC. Astronomers pay not the slightest attention to Creationist ideas. Nobody does—except evolutionists. We are dealing with competing religions—overarching explanations of origin and destiny. Thus the fury of their response to skepticism."

This is patently false. An absurd statement riddled with a special deformity of thought wrought from some place deep in the shallow pool of Fred's noosphere.

Where do I even begin...

Well, we could go with humor: https://ncse.com/project-steve

We could go with a direct counter point: http://www.badastronomy.com/index.html

Or just the straight solid fact that over 428,827 major publications in medicine cite evolution. That 87% of ALL scientists believe in evolution through natural processes alone(http://www.people-press.org/2009/07/09/section-5-evolution-climate-change-and-other-issues/) and that there is literally not actual controversy among all life sciences in regards to evolutionary theory. (Working Group on Teaching Evolution, National Academy of Sciences (1998). )

 

[fisharmor]

I read the entire article.

No, you absolutely did not.

If you did, then your fingers were totally unaware of most of its content as they typed the remainder of your response.

 

[fisharmor]

and that there is literally not actual controversy among all life sciences in regards to evolutionary theory.

There isn't any debate about global warm-er-change happening, either.


Your side is losing this argument. You're losing it by sounding like you're bringing your A game, and writing like your opponents are literally speaking a foreign language.

 

[heavenlyboy34]

"Third, evolutionists are obsessed by Christianity and Creationism, with which they imagine themselves to be in mortal combat. This is peculiar to them. Note that other sciences, such as astronomy and geology, even archaeology, are equally threatened by the notion that the world was created in 4004 BC. Astronomers pay not the slightest attention to Creationist ideas. Nobody does—except evolutionists. We are dealing with competing religions—overarching explanations of origin and destiny. Thus the fury of their response to skepticism."

This is patently false. An absurd statement riddled with a special deformity of thought wrought from some place deep in the shallow pool of Fred's noosphere.

Where do I even begin...

Well, we could go with humor: https://ncse.com/project-steve

We could go with a direct counter point: http://www.badastronomy.com/index.html

Or just the straight solid fact that over 428,827 major publications in medicine cite evolution. That 87% of ALL scientists believe in evolution through natural processes alone(http://www.people-press.org/2009/07/09/section-5-evolution-climate-change-and-other-issues/) and that there is literally not actual controversy among all life sciences in regards to evolutionary theory. (Working Group on Teaching Evolution, National Academy of Sciences (1998). )

https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/appeal-to-authority


[h=1]appeal to authority[/h] [h=2]You said that because an authority thinks something, it must therefore be true.[/h]

 

[Brian4Liberty]

No, you absolutely did not.

If you did, then your fingers were totally unaware of most of its content as they typed the remainder of your response.

Care to enlighten us with what you got out of it?

 

[The Rebel Poet]

Or just the straight solid fact that over 428,827 major publications in medicine cite evolution. That 87% of ALL scientists believe in evolution through natural processes alone(http://www.people-press.org/2009/07/09/section-5-evolution-climate-change-and-other-issues/) and that there is literally not actual controversy among all life sciences in regards to evolutionary theory. (Working Group on Teaching Evolution, National Academy of Sciences (1998). )

Democracy is not science.