*** DANIEL HANNAN on FREEDOM WATCH This week, full lineup here ***

[mczerone]

The production value is getting better every week for this show!

you mean the stock-video for phone guests and dual-internet feed video of guests? There was no phone ringing today either!

 

[reduen]

Craaaaap... The judge never told us what he read in the TARP Papers....

 

[RevolutionSD]

Michelle Muccio is hot!
I researched her though and she's pretty much a neocon. Worked for the neocon thinktank Heritage Foundation.

 

[axiomata]

Michelle Muccio is hot!
I researched her though and she's pretty much a neocon. Worked for the neocon thinktank Heritage Foundation.

I haven't researched her, but I hope you are not calling her a neocon simply because of where she worked in the past. That's awfully collectivist. Anyway, she now works for the Acton Institute which I respect.

Acton Institute Core Principals: http://www.acton.org/about/principles.php

 

[Deborah K]

Mr. Chubbs, do you think Judge Nap would have G. Edward Griffin on to talk about the Federal Reserve?

 

[Dreamofunity]

Move over Peter Schiff - Michelle Moccio may be my new 'favorite' economist!

Too bad she was only on for the last few minutes, I want to see more of her.

As for the neocon charges; I don't care if she talks.

 

[mrchubbs]

Youtube playlist is up....

http://freedomwatchonfox.com/2009/0...el-german-michelle-muccio-mike-ferguson/10102


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GUwy3YMFsJ0&feature=PlayList&p=F76EA418DF1920AA&index=0&playnext=1


Enjoy

 

[Dripping Rain]

Youtube playlist is up....

http://freedomwatchonfox.com/2009/0...el-german-michelle-muccio-mike-ferguson/10102


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GUwy3YMFsJ0&feature=PlayList&p=F76EA418DF1920AA&index=0&playnext=1


Enjoy

thank you chubbies

 

[RevolutionSD]

I haven't researched her, but I hope you are not calling her a neocon simply because of where she worked in the past. That's awfully collectivist. Anyway, she now works for the Acton Institute which I respect.

Acton Institute Core Principals: http://www.acton.org/about/principles.php

Nice. Well, her hot-ness makes up for any of her neocon tendancies.

 

[mello]

The Judge mentioned that in Missouri you don't need to mention that you are recording
someone but in Florida the law states that both parties need to know that they're being
recorded. Anyone know what the law is in Wisconsin?

It's probably a good idea to put a list of all 50 states recording laws on this forum.

 

[Mandrik]

Youtube playlist is up....

http://freedomwatchonfox.com/2009/0...el-german-michelle-muccio-mike-ferguson/10102


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GUwy3YMFsJ0&feature=PlayList&p=F76EA418DF1920AA&index=0&playnext=1


Enjoy

Thanks, bro! You win at the intrawebs with your U-Tuberz skills!

 

[mrchubbs]

The Judge mentioned that in Missouri you don't need to mention that you are recording
someone but in Florida the law states that both parties need to know that they're being
recorded. Anyone know what the law is in Wisconsin?

It's probably a good idea to put a list of all 50 states recording laws on this forum.

http://libertymaven.com/2009/04/09/know-the-law-secretly-recording-your-conversations/5233/


Enjoy!

 

[Joe3113]

The Judge mentioned that in Missouri you don't need to mention that you are recording
someone but in Florida the law states that both parties need to know that they're being
recorded. Anyone know what the law is in Wisconsin?

It's probably a good idea to put a list of all 50 states recording laws on this forum.

Excellent Idea.

There should be a whole section on that kinda stuff.

 

[qh4dotcom]

The Judge mentioned that in Missouri you don't need to mention that you are recording
someone but in Florida the law states that both parties need to know that they're being
recorded. Anyone know what the law is in Wisconsin?

It's probably a good idea to put a list of all 50 states recording laws on this forum.

I live in Florida. What would happen if someone records without telling the other party?

 

[Dreamofunity]

I actually had to look up the laws last night for a paper I did for Ethics, although I didn't look up punishments for violating it.

"The 37 states which allow one party consent recording of oral communications are: Alaska, Arkansas, Colorado, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, West Virginia, Wisconsin and Wyoming.

The District of Columbia also allows people to record conversations with the consent of only one party. Nevada has a one party consent statute but there is some question as to how the law should be interpreted by the courts. It could be considered an all party consent state.

The 12 states which definitely require all parties to a conversation to consent before it can be recorded are: California, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Montana, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania and Washington.

In California, there is an exception. You can record a conversation with the consent of only one party if certain criminal activity (kidnapping, extortion, bribery or a violent felony) is involved."

http://www.articlesbase.com/nationa...es/audio-recording-laws-in-the-us-431017.html

 

[IPSecure]

Why did not the Judge ask the ACLU guy to help Peter's dad?

 

[torchbearer]

Why did not the Judge ask the ACLU guy to help Peter's dad?

Overturning convictions is almost impossible.
The best way to help someone is at the moment of trial.
The only thing you can do after the trial is to appeal, which is to claim the trial did not provide you with due process because of some procedural problem or something.