Invisible Man
Member
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2019
- Messages
- 4,363
The solution in cases like you describe is to not take a side or attack both sides.
You mean like what McAdams did, and what Bongino refuses to do.
The solution in cases like you describe is to not take a side or attack both sides.
The solution in cases like you describe is to not take a side or attack both sides.
In the case of the Yellow Vests they were far better than Macron but they were French socialists.
The campus protestors are about equal to their enemies.
Attacking Bongino for pointing out the truth about them is just stupid, just as it was stupid for McAdams to defend Macron.
You mean like what McAdams did, and what Bongino refuses to do.
Good point. Maybe @Swordsmyth can provide a reference where Bongino attacked Zionists.
No, in fact there are a spate of meanings for spat, and a tiff is one.
Meanwhile there is not a spate of meanings for spate. There is but one.
spat
…
2 : a brief petty quarrel or angry outburst
…
This is what AI and the death of (honest) elitism has done to us. "Spat" is just a mis-spelling of spate.
How did AI do that before either of us was born?
My freaking Funk & Wagnall's says you're wrong.
Which is pretty much what Rossini said:
People say stupid things in order to wield that power.
You mean like what McAdams did, and what Bongino refuses to do.
Right. Because everybody knows that protest groups are monolithic and there are never good and bad people on both sides....oh wait a minute.
Oh look. These "Nazi" pro Palestinian protesters are so violent that a Zionist protester to "false flag" getting stabbed by a flag!
Let's not be coy.
Bongino knows damn well who McAdams is and his association with Ron Paul and that mindset.
Bongino's mission, just like Hannity, O'reilly, Beck, Daily Wire, etc, is to demonize anyone who inspires people to be uppity.
A spat can be a fight, probably derived from people spitting at eachother."To have a spate" is an idiom, and it means "to have a lot of words", "to have a spate of words" or just, "to have a spate". "Spat" is just the past-tense of spit. One might characterize an argument as "He spat at him" but spat is here a verb, not a noun, thus they cannot have a "spat", but they can have a "spate". See here.