Dallas Morning News already burying web pages/comments in favor of Medina

E

Endgame

Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2009
Messages
446
http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/news/texassouthwest/legislature/stories/DN-debate_15tex.ART.State.Edition2.4ba91cb.html

I saw a thread on another website that this newspaper deleted dozens of pro-Medina comments from this article. Looks like the establishment media in Texas is in a panic about Medina. This is only just beginning. I've been following the campaign ever since I heard she wiped the floor with the two NWO empty suits in the debates last night. I noticed a bunch of threads popping up on a conservative forum full of neocons, and almost every single poster said they would vote for her and even donate money.

A few tried to link her to Dr. Paul (OH NOS) but the sentiment seemed overwhelmingly in favor anyway. The reason most of those types hate RP is foreign policy and that doesn't really apply here. Seems like she's the liberty candidate that we need to all get behind NOW. Very encouraging to see this movement starting to bear fruit.
 
Not surprised. The Dallas Morning News is owned by BELO. The corporation that is shutting Medina out of the next debate; unless we can stop it.
 
we could really turn the race around.. but she MUST be in the next debate.
 
Where are all the Ron Paul people in TX???? They should hold a Debra Medina banner bomb! :p Seriously, become the media like we did for Ron!
 
this is so outrageous, the Dallas morning news must be flooded and BELO corp must be protested

I hope texans are outraged and mad at this as we are
 
We need to strike while the fires hot. Whatever creative ideas we have to act upon, we should be doing it right now. Newspaper ads, money bombs, whatever, now is the time. If she makes the rest of the debates (as she obviously deserves) we could have a serious campaign on our hands ala Rand Paul.
 
From the petition thread I wrote,
"In addition to the above, I think if Medina is not included in the debate, we should all write letters to the FCC now and when WFAA's annual license is up for renewal for violation of the good faith clause for license of use of the public airways. This is pursuant to the following clause in the petition:

Whereas: The Belo press release (found at http://j.mp/5bJNqb) states "The FCC and other bodies grant stations the right to exercise good faith news judgment in determining which candidates participate in televised debates, and to use reasonable news judgment in reaching such decisions, with the intent to neither promote a candidate nor create a disadvantage for a candidate." The exclusion of Debra Medina from Belo's debate, because of their obvious bias against her, clearly violates the "good faith" clause as well as the "promote...nor create a disadvantage for a candidate" clause.

This would likely be the only way to get a corrupt corporation such as Belo to take notice.
 
Heidi G. is a trojan, each of her points carefully chosen and presented so as to alienate.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

PAF
The CIA, Mossad, and Epstein: Unraveling the Intelligence Ties of the Maxwell Family
Replies
0
Views
153
PAF
PAF
Occam's Banana
SCOTUS is formally asked to overturn gay marriage ruling
Replies
16
Views
150
Occam's Banana
Occam's Banana
Occam's Banana
The free city of Próspera: Hong Kong of Honduras?
Replies
5
Views
3K
PAF
PAF
Occam's Banana
Adventures in "democracy": an index of threads
Replies
0
Views
28K
Occam's Banana
Occam's Banana
Anti Federalist
Nearly one-third of Democratic voters (34%) say Americans have “too much freedom.”
Replies
1
Views
323
jkr
jkr
Back
Top