Daily Caller Attacks Alex Jones

[Jandrsn21]

Daily Caller is a weird website. They let Bob Barr, Jack Hunter, and a slew of non establishment Gop types post their blogs on their site daily. Their coverage of Fast Furious in the conservative media is really second to none. Yet they attack Alex Jones with questions like how much money do you make off your radio show! It's the same strategy the "left" uses, and when the "left" uses it the Daily Caller attacks them for it. These is very pathetic journalism the Daily Caller is engaging in. Why not discuss the issues here instead of picking off the weak links at the protest.

 

[jmdrake]

It wasn't a "hit piece". It was the TRUTH. You're after truth, right?

Sure LE. Hate on AJ all you want. Those were a series of stupid non sequitor questions.

1) AJ has probably made less money fighting the globalists than Tucker Carlson made sucking up to them. How much money did Tucker Carlson make setting up Ron Paul to look like a whoremonger back in 2007/2008?

2) The Bilderberg Group doesn't want to draw attention to itself. Arresting a bunch of protesters would have the opposite effect of what they want. Have you ever studied Ghandi? The more the British arrested Ghandi and his supporters the more powerful they became.

But hey, if you like the DC's style of journalism then you should love the Maddow/Rand Paul "civil rights" interview.

 

[jmdrake]

Did they try to do an interview with him before this? Why confront him confrontationally, unless he turned down a one-on-one.

It's called "revenge journalism". Tucker Carlson's probably still ticked about this even though Alex Jones had nothing to do with it.

 

[Eisenhower]

why all the hate on alex jones sigh

 

[TheBlackPeterSchiff]

Love the folks in here that actually have faith in the American political process.


"Oooohhhhs nooosss, Shut up Alex Jones!!! There is a convention coming and he might make us look baaaaad"

 

[LibertyEagle]

Sure LE. Hate on AJ all you want. Those were a series of stupid non sequitor questions.

1) AJ has probably made less money fighting the globalists than Tucker Carlson made sucking up to them. How much money did Tucker Carlson make setting up Ron Paul to look like a whoremonger back in 2007/2008?

2) The Bilderberg Group doesn't want to draw attention to itself. Arresting a bunch of protesters would have the opposite effect of what they want. Have you ever studied Ghandi? The more the British arrested Ghandi and his supporters the more powerful they became.

But hey, if you like the DC's style of journalism then you should love the Maddow/Rand Paul "civil rights" interview.

Nice try, but I'm not fond of either Alex Jones or Tucker Carlson.

I they they both are shills.

 

[LibertyEagle]

What you see and what is real are two entirely different things it seems. Facts can be presented Joe Friday style or Carl Sagan style or Alex Jones style or Adolf Hitler style. I will acept them as facts AFTER I personally verify the information to my satisfaction. None of you blitherers are gonna change that. That you are so knee jerked about it is indicative of one thing..A closed mind. Fine..it's your mind..don't do with it whatever you can't. I don't even read Alex regularly..maybe once a month but you clowns are off on a trip in lala land over delivery. I have seen it been asked her many times to lay out this long list of lies and I hear about one or two incidents from 15+ years of broadcasting. But the same Alex bashers will post a FOX news hit piece full of lies in a hurry and debate the alacrity of it for endless pages.

I await your next troll. I give you credit there because if you believe these fantasies well...

Rev9

What the hell are you talking about NOW?

The OP said Jones was "attacked". I said he wasn't; that the headline of the article was true. Jones DID refuse to answer the questions posed him.

Now, if that pisses you off, well, too bad.

 

[jmdrake]

Nice try, but I'm not fond of either Alex Jones or Tucker Carlson.

I they they both are shills.

I didn't say you were a fan of Tucker Carlson. But you were acting like the DC's questions were legit. Glad to see I was mistaken and you agree that it was a ridiculous hit piece.

 

[LibertyEagle]

I didn't say you were a fan of Tucker Carlson. But you were acting like the DC's questions were legit. Glad to see I was mistaken and you agree that it was a ridiculous hit piece.

The title is about Jones refusing to answer any questions. He DID refuse.

 

[jmdrake]

The title is about Jones refusing to answer any questions. He DID refuse.

The title of the thread is "Daily Caller Attacks Alex Jones". They did attack Alex Jones. I recall not that many months ago Ron Paul refused to answer questions of a certain CNN "journalist". We all praised him for that. At least I did.

 

[John F Kennedy III]

Oh FFS. The first question they asked is if Chuck Norris was attending Bilderberg. Daily Caller doesn't give a damn about the truth. Alex Jones has turned more people over to Ron Paul than probably 90% of the people on this forum.

+rep for 100% truth

 

[John F Kennedy III]

What you see and what is real are two entirely different things it seems. Facts can be presented Joe Friday style or Carl Sagan style or Alex Jones style or Adolf Hitler style. I will acept them as facts AFTER I personally verify the information to my satisfaction. None of you blitherers are gonna change that. That you are so knee jerked about it is indicative of one thing..A closed mind. Fine..it's your mind..don't do with it whatever you can't. I don't even read Alex regularly..maybe once a month but you clowns are off on a trip in lala land over delivery. I have seen it been asked her many times to lay out this long list of lies and I hear about one or two incidents from 15+ years of broadcasting. But the same Alex bashers will post a FOX news hit piece full of lies in a hurry and debate the alacrity of it for endless pages.

I await your next troll. I give you credit there because if you believe these fantasies well...

Rev9

Perfect post.

+rep

 

[John F Kennedy III]

Love the folks in here that actually have faith in the American political process.


"Oooohhhhs nooosss, Shut up Alex Jones!!! There is a convention coming and he might make us look baaaaad"

Right?

 

[KingRobbStark]

This thread is usless. I dont know much about this Alex Jones, but the people defending (and attacking him) need to calm the fuck down. We all have our opinions, lets just be respectful. Respect can win over some of your most arduous opponents.

 

[XTreat]

that wasnt even a very good hit piece.

 

[MoneyWhereMyMouthIs2]

2) The Bilderberg Group doesn't want to draw attention to itself. Arresting a bunch of protesters would have the opposite effect of what they want.

I doubt they care anymore. By the time everyone knows about something, the "behind the scenes" shit is usually going on elsewhere. And they actually did arrest a few people for pretty much nothing.

 

[Chrysamere]

It saddens me that so many obviously very intelligent people here take Alex Jones seriously. When something is 10%, he will make it 20% so it sounds more dangerous, he's just another fear monger. Actually, he's worse than the other fearmongers, he takes important topics and makes a complete joke out of them.

You know why people don't take you seriously when you talk about stopping a globalist agenda? Because of people like Alex Jones.

I hope you people will wake up one day and snap out of it.

 

[LibertyEagle]

It saddens me that so many obviously very intelligent people here take Alex Jones seriously. When something is 10%, he will make it 20% so it sounds more dangerous, he's just another fear monger. Actually, he's worse than the other fearmongers, he takes important topics and makes a complete joke out of them.

You know why people don't take you seriously when you talk about stopping a globalist agenda? Because of people like Alex Jones.

I hope you people will wake up one day and snap out of it.

Now that, I agree with you on.

 

[Travlyr]

It saddens me that so many obviously very intelligent people here take Alex Jones seriously. When something is 10%, he will make it 20% so it sounds more dangerous, he's just another fear monger. Actually, he's worse than the other fearmongers, he takes important topics and makes a complete joke out of them.

You know why people don't take you seriously when you talk about stopping a globalist agenda? Because of people like Alex Jones.

I hope you people will wake up one day and snap out of it.

Who else is consistently exposing the globalist agenda?

 

[Chrysamere]

Who else is consistently exposing the globalist agenda?

He isn't exposing any agenda, he makes up an agenda for them and then spews that crap everyday. Let's take Bilderberg, the problem with Bilderberg is that a group of very powerful people, some of them democraticly elected, come together to talk and maybe even make decisions about our future secret. Instead of adressing that, he starts making up stories about what their supposed agenda is this year, like the Ron Paul assassination that they've been supposedly talking about for 3 years in a row now. You don't really buy that bullshit do you?