D.C. Mayor Begs for National Guard as City Is “Overwhelmed” With Migrants

PAF said:
I don't think that you get me, nobody's_hero. I have sat on committee, I was the District Coordinator who won hands down all 3 RP delegates, VIP at Convention, coordinated nat delegates, etc. I have set up tables at monthly gun shows passing out information on candidates, GMO, A21, etc. I have coordinated many, many liberty meetings in not 1, but 2 states, packing anywhere from 25 folks up to 200 at a time. I have started and coordinated Constitution Events 3 years in a row at a public park, folks came in from 4 different states (NY, WV, PA, OH). I am also the person who coordinated packets going to every nat del in every state going to Tampa Convention. I have done more for the cause of Liberty than you could possibly know.

Attending Tampa was the eye opener for me, witnessing first hand all of the corruption that took place. In 2016, when Mr. Libtard decided to run, I warned committee and many, many folks about him. I was ridiculed, shunned, and told to leave. Same experience this year as folks are putting 2024 signs up everywherwe.

As for Mr. Mike Kelly, he has attended some of my liberty meetings early on, but now he stays as far away as possible, knowing that I and others in our group hold him fully accountable.

So, until the retard-idiots in the R party decide that they want to hold them accountable, which they refuse to do, I have no desire or business walking into a voting booth again.
Click to expand...

Look, the point of this thread is that when the rubber meets the road, people who will sanctimoniously claim to be in favor of open-door immigration will panic like squirrel on an L.A. freeway when they actually have to deal with the fallout first-hand. I see no reason to plant my flag over this. It's just a matter of fact that has been exposed thanks to this experimental policy of shipping immigrants to blue areas instead of just taking it up the butt whenever liberals want to flood the red states to change the political landscape. Liberals say they want open borders when in actuality they have no plan for how to deal with tired, hungry, huddled masses. Even if it is only 4,000 of them out of 3+ million.

IF there was a way to make people pay directly, personally for the costs associated with rampant immigration, I would fully support it because they might change their tune on our current free-for-all welfare as well. But alas, this will have to do for now.

The best plumber in the world still turns off the water before fixing the pipe. Let's start by turning off the water.
 
Last edited:
nobody's_hero said:
Look, the point of this thread is that when the rubber meets the road, people who will sanctimoniously claim to be in favor of open-door immigration will panic like squirrel on an L.A. freeway when they actually have to deal with the fallout first-hand. I see no reason to plant my flag over this. It's just a matter of fact that has been exposed thanks to this experimental policy of shipping immigrants to blue areas instead of just taking it up the butt whenever liberals want to flood the red states to change the political landscape. Liberals say they want open borders when in actuality they have no plan for how to deal with tired, hungry, huddled masses.

IF there was a way to make people pay directly for the costs associated with rampant immigration, I would fully support it because they might change their tune on our current free-for-all welfare as well. But alas, this will have to do for now.

The best plumber in the world still turns off the water before fixing the pipe. Let's start by turning off the water.
Click to expand...

You are too caught up in the left-right-march-in-lock-step paradigm. You are too caught up in the open versus closed border paradigm. If one side says this, you must be for that. If they are for that, you must be for this.

To all statists - get your heads out of the stinking toilet. Look at the only fiscally responsible solution which provides the most freedom. Otherwise, sleep in the bed that you make, and honor the MIC/lobbyists who count on your support.
 
nobody's_hero said:
Sounds like he needs to be voted out. But you don't vote, so just magic his *ss out of there lol ;)
Click to expand...

That's about his only option anyway, since he seems to be the only voter in his district who doesn't have his head up his ass.
 
PAF said:
You are too caught up in the left-right-march-in-lock-step paradigm. You are too caught up in the open versus closed border paradigm. If one side says this, you must be for that. If they are for that, you must be for this.

To all statists - get your heads out of the stinking toilet. Look at the only fiscally responsible solution which provides the most freedom. Otherwise, sleep in the bed that you make, and honor the MIC/lobbyists who count on your support.
Click to expand...

If my stance on immigration is influenced by anything, it was the words of T. Jefferson.

…But are there no inconveniences to be thrown into the scale against the advantage expected from a multiplication of numbers by the importation of foreigners? It is for the happiness of those united in society to harmonize as much as possible in matters which they must of necessity transact together. Civil government being the sole object of forming societies, its administration must be conducted by common consent. Every species of government has its specific principles. Ours perhaps are more peculiar than those of any other in the universe. It is a composition of the freest principles of the English constitution, with others derived from natural right and natural reason. To these nothing can be more opposed than the maxims of absolute monarchies. Yet, from such, we are to expect the greatest number of emigrants. They will bring with them the principles of the governments they leave, imbibed in their early youth; or, if able to throw them off, it will be in exchange for an unbounded licentiousness, passing, as is usual, from one extreme to another. It would be a miracle were they to stop precisely at the point of temperate liberty. These principles, with their language, they will transmit to their children. In proportion to their numbers, they will share with us the legislation. They will infuse into it their spirit, warp and bias its direction, and render it a heterogeneous, incoherent, distracted mass. I may appeal to experience, during the present contest, for a verification of these conjectures. But, if they be not certain in event, are they not possible, are they not probable? Is it not safer to wait with patience 27 years and three months longer, for the attainment of any degree of population desired, or expected? May not our government be more homogeneous, more peaceable, more durable? Suppose 20 millions of republican Americans thrown all of a sudden into France, what would be the condition of that kingdom? If it would be more turbulent, less happy, less strong, we may believe that the addition of half a million of foreigners to our present numbers would produce a similar effect here. If they come of themselves, they are entitled to all the rights of citizenship: but I doubt the expediency of inviting them by extraordinary encouragements….- Notes on the State of Virginia
Click to expand...

This is quite honestly what I worry about the most. Sure, you will argue that we're already beyond the point of salvaging any remnant of the constitutional republic which the nation was founded on, or the guiding principles of liberty that inspired it. But as a practical matter, Jefferson is fairly well vindicated on this, as you can see it happening in the present times on an internal level via state-to-state migration.

IOW, today's scenario: 'Suppose 20 million marxist Californians were thrown all of a sudden into Texas.'

So if you think I just woke up one morning and tuned into Fox News and swiftly became disillusioned with open borders because the left is for it, that's not the case, and perhaps it would behoove you not to assume everyone is incapable of an original conclusion besides yourself.
 
Last edited:
No. The mayor should deal with all those migrants. Maybe she could even invite some of them to live at her house.
 
Has anyone checked Wikipedia this morning to see what the new definition of pawn is?

domino-tile-dominos-B5mXmaC-600.jpg
 
Anti Federalist said:
Cry me a river, ya $#@!ing Marxist $#@! ya.

With any luck, they are bussing up a bunch of rapey motherfuckers.

Keep 'em coming Texas...I'd pitch in to a fund to double the number of busses.
Click to expand...

They’ll be happy to take whatever funds you can give. Hell, even the repuGs won’t make any mention of stopping the funding.

Dems need voters, repuGs need those contracts, don’t ya know.
 
I have been following this pretty closely.....besides the human aspect of all of this, which is horrible, What Texas and AR are doing is awesome!!! They have sent closer to 9,500 immigrants into DC and they have declared a state of emergency now. !0,000 immigrants isn't even 1% of DC population and they are declaring an emergency already claiming that they do not receive federal money like Texas does..,...lol....I only hope they keep sending them there. I also hope they start sending them to Portland, Seattle, Detroit and all of the other woke liberal run cesspools. We have a crises at our border created by people who have absolutely no understanding of the consequences of their actions.
 
showpan said:
I have been following this pretty closely.....besides the human aspect of all of this, which is horrible, What Texas and AR are doing is awesome!!! They have sent closer to 9,500 immigrants into DC and they have declared a state of emergency now. !0,000 immigrants isn't even 1% of DC population and they are declaring an emergency already claiming that they do not receive federal money like Texas does..,...lol....I only hope they keep sending them there. I also hope they start sending them to Portland, Seattle, Detroit and all of the other woke liberal run cesspools. We have a crises at our border created by people who have absolutely no understanding of the consequences of their actions.
Click to expand...

Just to nitpick, 10k is greater than 1% of the population of DC.
 
What would Ron Paul say/do.

It is a shame that on this RPF that consensus is what the uneducated newz-watching population feels. More tax-payer money, more police-state apparatus, the continued demise of this country.

Imagine if the People instead rallied around Ending Incentives and stop lining the pockets of the MIC, how much richer and freer we would be.


A relevant thread, but I will leave the graphic here as well:

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?560185-Jopys-Of-Toying-With-Certain-People

slide-jpg.9491
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Voluntarist
Declare A National Emergency
3 4 5
Replies
92
Views
639
Anti Federalist
Anti Federalist
PAF
3 states sending 700 National Guard troops to DC
2 3
Replies
51
Views
313
acptulsa
acptulsa
nikcers
Chicago mayor signs executive order in response to possible deployment of National Guard
Replies
8
Views
54
TheTexan
TheTexan
PAF
Trump deploys National Guard to Memphis, calls it ‘replica’ of Washington crackdown
Replies
0
Views
43
PAF
PAF
PAF
Trump Places DC Police Under FEDERAL CONTROL, Deploys National Guard
5 6 7
Replies
130
Views
1K
Occam's Banana
Occam's Banana
Back
Top