http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box...rump-abortion-comments-we-shouldnt-be-talking
This is supposedly the 'pro-life' jesus candidate who supposedly wants abortion banned in all instances, even for rape and incest. He is supported by lobbies who openly say that 'abortion is murder'. Yet, if he and those special interest groups genuinely believed that principle they would be in favor of charging the mothers as accomplices to murder too.
Abortion isn't even a historical issue, no one cared about it historically. What happened was that some mothers would find poisons/herbal remedies, and ingest them.
The catholic church didn't even formally declare life beginning at conception until the late 19th century. Even from 1869 to 1917, only late term abortions were technically penalized by the church.
Point is, abortion is either murder or it isn't. If abortion is murder, the mother should be charged as an accomplice to murder, if not the primary murderer.
This is supposedly the 'pro-life' jesus candidate who supposedly wants abortion banned in all instances, even for rape and incest. He is supported by lobbies who openly say that 'abortion is murder'. Yet, if he and those special interest groups genuinely believed that principle they would be in favor of charging the mothers as accomplices to murder too.
Abortion isn't even a historical issue, no one cared about it historically. What happened was that some mothers would find poisons/herbal remedies, and ingest them.
The catholic church didn't even formally declare life beginning at conception until the late 19th century. Even from 1869 to 1917, only late term abortions were technically penalized by the church.
Point is, abortion is either murder or it isn't. If abortion is murder, the mother should be charged as an accomplice to murder, if not the primary murderer.