Fellow Ron Paul Supporters,
Some time ago I saw a post that mentioned Ron Paul winning Jefferson County in Iowa. A comment in response to the post from one of the supporters there said they used cheap weekly ads in local newspapers to reach the voters. If I'm not mistaken, it was also mentioned that the ads were changed periodically (perhaps weekly), which also obviously had a positive effect. IMO, Meetup organizers (including myself) should launch ChipIns to this end ASAP, especially for the upcoming primary states (including doing all the other related work). For the ads, focus on the issues that the voters in each of our areas are sensitive to, and if we're not sure, at least do a general ad.
I think this can have a significant effect on Ron Paul's name recognition among the "90%" voters, perhaps even effectively bypassing the mainstream media censorship of Ron Paul. I look forward to insightful comments from my brothers and sisters in liberty.
One more thing. If the charges of vote fraud in NH can be proven, then I support a recount. But I believe that the media censorship of RP may negatively effect the voting process even more heavily than voting machines. If I want to steal from people, I'd probably prefer to have them cheat themselves for me than attempt to break into their homes and run the associated risk.
Best Regards,
Louis
Some time ago I saw a post that mentioned Ron Paul winning Jefferson County in Iowa. A comment in response to the post from one of the supporters there said they used cheap weekly ads in local newspapers to reach the voters. If I'm not mistaken, it was also mentioned that the ads were changed periodically (perhaps weekly), which also obviously had a positive effect. IMO, Meetup organizers (including myself) should launch ChipIns to this end ASAP, especially for the upcoming primary states (including doing all the other related work). For the ads, focus on the issues that the voters in each of our areas are sensitive to, and if we're not sure, at least do a general ad.
I think this can have a significant effect on Ron Paul's name recognition among the "90%" voters, perhaps even effectively bypassing the mainstream media censorship of Ron Paul. I look forward to insightful comments from my brothers and sisters in liberty.
One more thing. If the charges of vote fraud in NH can be proven, then I support a recount. But I believe that the media censorship of RP may negatively effect the voting process even more heavily than voting machines. If I want to steal from people, I'd probably prefer to have them cheat themselves for me than attempt to break into their homes and run the associated risk.
Best Regards,
Louis