Credit Default Swaps (Derivatives) at root of implosion.

wizardwatson

Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2007
Messages
8,077
I'm hoping this to be kind of an educational thread because I don't fully understand this domino effect that is occuring in this CDS market but I think understanding it even a little gives you an ominous and stark view of the implosion that is currently happening.

http://www.investors.com/editorial/IBDArticles.asp?artsec=16&issue=20080917

This wealth evaporation that is occurring is likely to be catastrophic if Rockwell and company are right in that government help (read: bailouts) is only making it worse.

In places I've read that the US market for these types of derivatives may be on the order of 60+ trillion dollars. The degree to which we allow these bailouts which socialize the losses only causes more pain on top of the pain we will feel when this fake money evaporates and we finally see the results in retirement pensions, 401ks, and finally I'm guessing inflated prices in all sectors as well as many franchise/subsidized businesses closing their doors.

The crux is, the malinvestment created by all this central bank money pumping has already happened. The derivative contracts are in place and what we are seeing is a calling in on all this debt as the real economy (read: market) is becoming sort of self-aware of the malinvesting and is pulling back (a needed correction that the MSM is calling 'panic'). As it pulls back the rate of investing (the rate of money creation) is slowing and causing defaults. Problem is the CDS market is relatively new and has never been tested in a default scenario.

So it doesn't seem like the government can really do anything except socialize the losses (hyperinflate dollar) or just shut the market down like Russia (Go to police state, go directly to police state, do not pass go, do not collect $200), they're hands are tied. They can't stick their nose in between millions of transactions happening worldwide and play mediator.

Anyway, that's my haphazard attempt to understand it. Feel free to chime in.
 
Rumor is that Goldman was a major player in taking down the competition. They were heavily involved in these swaps on the competitors.
 
risk assessment "models" have never incorporated a massive 'tsunami,' even after the "Long Term Credit" clusterf#ck of last decade. the primary reason, i assume, is the belief that gov't would facilitate a bailout (as it did w/LTC).

i'm sure many of you have heard of the Black - Scholes option pricing model. Myron Scholes who won a Nobel Prize in economics was one of LTCs directors.

"regulators" were/are either too dumb to understand this, or were operating under the same set of beliefs that the banking community has.

These guys are like blackjack players on a losing streak: keep doubling your bet, it's bound to work out in the end.
 

Good read.

I'm only wondering how fast this will play out. How long will leaders stand there while the world economy is gutted.

I guess, hopefully, they will stand there a long time.

But realistically I think they will fiddle with it until they realize it can't be contained, then we'll see major blowback from the totalitarian 'survival instinct' of the state apparatus.
 
Rumor is that Goldman was a major player in taking down the competition. They were heavily involved in these swaps on the competitors.


I am hearing that Goldman is making money from them - they will now come in like vultures and clean the carcasus.
 
These are insurance on investment objects. The root is that no one can put an accurate price on the CDOs (Collateralized derivative objects). So the insurers and all counter party to policy holders are on the hook to pay for losses on those CDOs.

So it would seem like the CDS is the culprit but in reality its the CDOs. The CDS are a level above the CDOs in the house of cards. I was reading about them 2 years ago and how they would unwind and crash.
 
By insuring their portfolios, regulators allow banks less cash in reserves, a process known as "regulatory arbitrage.

If AIG were allowed to fail the banks would have went under the reserve requirements and would have had to call in loans to reserve up. This is amazing. The banks would have had to contract the money supply. The FEd is worthless. Reserve ratios need to be upped to 100%.
 
Back
Top