CPAC is giving the Defender of the Constitution Award to.. Donald Rumsfeld?

Anti Federalist said:
Brother, you know I've got nothing but the highest level of respect for you, and I understand your point.

I'm just ruined after years and years and years in a rough environment.

I don't play well with others anymore.

That, and I have zero tolerance anymore for public "officials" that continually piss on my leg and tell me, "it's raining".
Click to expand...

No worries, I was just picking up the shreds of my dignity so it can heal before the next time I feel compelled to say something so revolting... :p;)
 
I wouldn't want to disrupt the event, but I wouldn't have any problem whatsoever booing someone like Cheney or Rummy, or GW, or any of these formerly elected neocon officials. If the conservatives in the room see that half the room disapproves of these people, they might take a minute and stop and ask themselves "why"? and then follow up with some research.



Or re could get all of our people in place and fill the room. As soon as he gets up to speak we all stand up and silently walk out :-P
 
Last edited:
Well that's a bit difficult as Rand Paul will be speaking at 3:45 and Rumsfeld will be presented with the award (some other room) at 4 pm. Now, Rumsfeld will be doing a book signing at 4:30 but I can't see anyone buying his book and also, Tom Woods will be doing a book signing at the same time. Intentional scheduling to minimize disruptions from liberty types?
 
BrooklynZoo said:
Well that's a bit difficult as Rand Paul will be speaking at 3:45 and Rumsfeld will be presented with the award (some other room) at 4 pm. Now, Rumsfeld will be doing a book signing at 4:30 but I can't see anyone buying his book and also, Tom Woods will be doing a book signing at the same time. Intentional scheduling to minimize disruptions from liberty types?
Click to expand...

Rumsfeld will be right after Rand Paul in the Marriot Ballroom. I think we should just get up and leave.
 
Would it be impolite to laugh when Rumsfeld is announced? Like we're all in on the joke and that the people applauding are applauding the great joke that was played...
 
Elwar said:
Would it be impolite to laugh when Rumsfeld is announced? Like we're all in on the joke and that the people applauding are applauding the great joke that was played...
Click to expand...
I don't know if I'll be able to prevent myself from laughing...
 
Booing might be uncool, but it would be awesome if when it was announced, a LARGE number of people just got up and left. I think that would be statement enough. and if it got videotaped for a YouTube, even better.
 
I guess that's all that left now after the Nobel Peace Prize was already taken.

Fox_guarding_hen_house.png
 
I like the idea that a bunch of people get up leave dissapointed shaking their heads right as its announced.
 
MRoCkEd said:
Rumsfeld will be right after Rand Paul in the Marriot Ballroom. I think we should just get up and leave.
Click to expand...

Ya good idea. Are we allowed to leave a postit sticky on our chairs saying FU Rumsfeld ? Just wondering. LOL
 
dannno said:
What if we packed the room and were all completely silent?
Click to expand...

That would make an impact. A video showing a lot of people not "enthusiastic". He's not worthy of a comment mindset. Would you boo the 2-14 Carolina Panthers last year if they played your team? Something different draws attention, imo.
 
MelissaCato said:
Ya good idea. Are we allowed to leave a postit sticky on our chairs saying FU Rumsfeld ? Just wondering. LOL
Click to expand...

I think everyone leaving will be obvious enough. The media WILL report it if 2/3 of the room leaves and the room is much emptier. Since it is going to be packed for Rand, that is a pretty likely situation, if people just leave. Remember that part of CPAC is to charm others. It isn't charming to walk out in an obviously insulting fashion. Gratifying for about an hour, sure, until Ron is squeezed out of a debate because people don't want his supporters there.
 
sailingaway said:
I think everyone leaving will be obvious enough. The media WILL report it if 2/3 of the room leaves and the room is much emptier. Since it is going to be packed for Rand, that is a pretty likely situation, if people just leave. Remember that part of CPAC is to charm others. It isn't charming to walk out in an obviously insulting fashion. Gratifying for about an hour, sure, until Ron is squeezed out of a debate because people don't want his supporters there.
Click to expand...

This is all so true. There is absolutely no point in going to CPAC if you are going to be a detriment. A bunch of people on C4L discounted tickets protesting is a good way to hurt the C4L.
 
So some Ron Paul people think we should all "Go along to get along..." when Rumsfeld is introduced? Yeah...like that's what got us here to this point! WE'RE WINNING THIS BATTLE!! Here's an idea that is sure to draw the desired "tsk tsk" of NEOCON establishment types...why don't we ALL turn our backs to Rummy during his entire speech? The purpose being to OFFEND THE OATH BREAKER RUMSFELD as much as possible!! Feedback?
 
Wallbanger said:
So some Ron Paul people think we should all "Go along to get along..." when Rumsfeld is introduced? Yeah...like that's what got us here to this point! WE'RE WINNING THIS BATTLE!! Here's an idea that is sure to draw the desired "tsk tsk" of NEOCON establishment types...why don't we ALL turn our backs to Rummy during his entire speech? The purpose being to OFFEND THE OATH BREAKER RUMSFELD as much as possible!! Feedback?
Click to expand...

Oh lookie another new guy. If thats what you got from all this then you have a reading comprehension problem.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

PAF
What Is the Third Term Project? Pro-Trump Group Bids to Change Constitution
2 3 4
Replies
62
Views
402
nikcers
nikcers
Brian4Liberty
Tariffs and the Constitution
Replies
10
Views
1K
acptulsa
acptulsa
susano
El Salvador President Bukele to speak at CPAC
Replies
1
Views
646
Matt Collins
Matt Collins
PAF
The First Cause of Modern War is the Modern State
Replies
0
Views
245
PAF
PAF
Swordsmyth
A Supreme Court Ruling on Labor Boards Could Let Trump Take Over the Federal Reserve
2
Replies
26
Views
163
acptulsa
acptulsa
Back
Top