QuickZ06
Member
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2011
- Messages
- 2,820
or maybe they knew exactly what would trigger a raid and bought those things in order to generate a large cash payout
no one who has ever worked for the CIA can be trusted
Mind blown.
or maybe they knew exactly what would trigger a raid and bought those things in order to generate a large cash payout
no one who has ever worked for the CIA can be trusted
Mind blown.
or maybe they knew exactly what would trigger a raid and bought those things in order to generate a large cash payout
no one who has ever worked for the CIA can be trusted
face palm. give me a fucking break. You assholes can go looking everywhere for the conspiracy while trying to demonize everyone who has had a job doing something you don't like....I will stand up for these people's constitutional rights.
Sincerely,
Slutter McGee
Slutter McGee
Once a CIA agent, always a CIA agent. - Ron Paul
Having a hard time working up sympathy for former CIA employees.
Not sure what you're talking about.Ok, let's just ignore what the cops are doing.
...
In November 2013, the couple filed a federal lawsuit against the county’s board of commissioners, as well as the officers involved. The family claimed the raid was an unlawful search-and-seizure in violation of the 14th and Fourth Amendments. The suit, which asked for $7 million in damages, also argued law enforcement violated state laws including trespassing and abuse of power.
In December, 2015, U.S. District Judge John W. Lungstrum threw out the family’s case citing qualified immunity, the legal doctrine that shields officers from liability for otherwise lawful acts in the course of their duty. The Hartes appealed.
This week, the three judge panel — Carlos Lucero, Gregory Phillips and Nancy Moritz — ruled against the state, sending the case back to district court. The 100-page decision pushed back hard against the claim that police officers are immune from legal responsibility if they are just doing their jobs.
I wonder where they got the records who who purchased the equipment?
Trying to work through this in my head. If the majority of this stuff is purchased by non-pot growers, then why doesn't this happen more often? I'm wondering if the couple (being ex-CIA and all) got a clue that they were under surveillance...flushed their plants, planted butternut squash and waited for the cops to show up just to make them look ridiculous.
God, I hope so.
Cops have been staking out grow shops for a few decades. Sometimes even posting cameras on street poles to capture licence plates.
Sgt. James Wingo of the Missouri State Highway Patrol started pulling surveillance shifts in the parking lots of hydroponic garden stores around the state. The project's logic, as Wingo explained in a 2011 letter to other law enforcement agencies, was that the stores "sell items that are consistently found in indoor marijuana growing operations." As customers came and went, Wingo would note their license plate information and enter names into a database.
Over five years now, and still searching for "justice"...
‘We’ll never be the same’: How a hydroponic tomato garden inspired cops to raid a family’s home
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...ps-to-raid-their-home/?utm_term=.1f705f742118
<snip>
The Hartes would eventually file a federal lawsuit against the county, city, and officers involved. And although a federal judge later threw out their claim, this week a three-judge panel on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit ruled that the family could move forward in court. The decision has larger implications for Fourth Amendment litigation and legislation targeting badly behaving police officers.
The scorching judicial pronouncement blasted authorities for laziness and possible fabrication, the kind of overzealous police work that’s become a sometimes deadly facet of the drug war. And despite the sustained effort of the Obama administration to power down the law enforcement’s more quixotic battles with illicit substances, Attorney General Jeff Sessions has promised to reprioritize marijuana investigations. The Hartes case is a textbook reminder how that can be dangerous.
“Our family will never be the same,” Addie told The Post. “If this can happen to us, everybody in the country needs to be afraid,” Bob added.
The Leawood, Kansas, couple whose home was raided in 2012 after sheriff's deputies claimed that loose tea found in their trash was marijuana will receive $150,000 for their trouble under a settlement agreement with the Johnson County Sheriff's Office. The settlement—which caps seven years of litigation, including two trips to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit—falls far short of the $7 million that Adlynn and Robert Harte originally sought. But it represents an implicit acknowledgment that the Hartes and their children suffered an outrageous invasion of their privacy and dignity in the service of a comically inept publicity stunt.
Here are some of the absurd facts that emerged as the couple's case was making its way through the courts:
• The family was targeted because Robert Harte bought supplies at a hydroponic gardening store in Kansas City. Harte was planning to grow vegetables with his son as a science project. But to Sgt. James Wingo of the Missouri State Highway Patrol, who was staking out the store, he looked like a cannabis kingpin.
...
More: https://reason.com/2020/05/05/weed-...-for-marijuana-will-pay-their-victims-150000/