Could MA be the first state to legalize marijuana tomorrow? (House Bill 1371)

Massachusetts

Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2012
Messages
667
Four House lawmakers have introduced legislation that seeks to legalize and regulate the "production, distribution, and sale" of marijuana to adults. As introduced, House Bill 1371 seeks to regulate the commercial production and distribution of marijuana for adults over 21 years of age. This measure would impose licensing requirements and excise taxes on the commercial, for-profit retail sale of cannabis. The measure has been referred to the Joint Committee on the Judiciary and is scheduled for a hearing on Tuesday, March 6th at 1pm in Room A-2 of the Boston Statehouse.

Adults who possess or grow marijuana for personal use, or who share cannabis with other adults, would not be subject to taxation under the law.

House Bill 1371 can be read here

If approved this measure would:

1) Raise tens of millions of dollars in annual tax revenue for the state of Massachusetts;

2) Restrict access to marijuana to those under age 21;

3) Improve public safety by redirecting law enforcement efforts to focus on more serious crimes; and

4) Institute reasonable regulation consistent with the state and federal constitution.

In 2008, 65 percent of voters in Massachusetts endorsed Question 2 reclassifying possession of an ounce or less of cannabis as a fine-only civil offense under state law.

In 2010, Massachusetts marijuana activists conducted two polls of actual voters on election day, November 2, 2010. In the first of the polls, just under fifty-six percent of the 133,924 voters who expressed an opinion supported "legislation that would allow the state to regulate the taxation, cultivation, and sale of marijuana to adults." In the second, over sixty-six percent of the 67,322 voters who expressed an opinion supported �legislation that would allow the state to regulate and tax marijuana in the same manner as alcohol."

House Bill 1371 is a fiscally conservative, common sense proposal that seeks to bring control to Massachusetts' untaxed, unregulated marijuana market.
 
It's just a damn plant, will they let people grow it for themselves if they want to and sell it at the farmers market?

If not it's still illegal.
 
"legislation that would allow the state to regulate the taxation, cultivation, and sale of marijuana to adults."

well this is telling,regulate cultivation and sales, not very freemarket if you ask me.
this like all govt regulations will fail, kids still get booze.

It doesnt say weather or not the FEDs will stay out ,im guessing not if the state wants its federal funding for enforcing other drug laws ect...
they say tax ,so they are all for that,but excludes why state nullification of fed laws isnt a option.

im really curious to see if they have arangments with different companies poised to corner the market and regulate the small guys out.

id like to see the bill in its entirety,untill then RP is the only one ending the FEDs war on drugs.
 
This is a great start.. but are they going to allow people to grow there own Marijuana in there homes? Also, can the Fed arrest them even though its legal in the states?
 
It's just a damn plant, will they let people grow it for themselves if they want to and sell it at the farmers market?

If not it's still illegal.

You can grow it yourself and "share it with friends"

Commercial growers and retailers need a license.

That's a pretty good start.
 
exactly, you need a licence,meaning theres still a blackmarket,and it doesnt address people growing for personal consumption.
it just says you need a licence for cultivation and sales,also theres taxes that depend on the THC percentage being measured wich isnt cheap,

"The authority shall collect an excise upon sales by processors of cannabis at a rate of ten dollars per 1% of THC content per ounce. The amount of said excise shall be calculated by multiplying the THC content of the cannabis, expressed by percentage, by one thousand dollars (Example: an ounce of cannabis containing 5% THC is taxed fifty dollars, as .05 x $1,000 is $50.) Determination of THC content shall be established by dry weight, without seeds. Subject to approval by the general court, such excise shall be adjusted by the authority from time to time as necessary to maximize the revenue derived therefrom, and to minimize the incentive for the sale of cannabis not in accordance with the provisions of this chapter."

so theres a encentive to produce low thc producing plants,to avoid taxes,unfortunatley that will help negate part of the plant that has health benifits.

this is a bill i would be carefull of.
 
I don't even know if this bill will be even be voted on. I was a bit overly optimistic about it. It's just filed under "Miscellaneous Issues" for the state House. I called my House reps and neither were in their office.
 
Good luck at the hearing. A similar bill was voted down by a committee in NH. The vote was 10 against the bill and 7 for the bill. 2 of the 3 bill sponsors are FSPers. 2 of the 3 bill sponsors endorsed Ron Paul. All 3 are libertarian Republicans.

The full NH House will vote on the bill on Thursday.

Here are the committee reports on the bill.

HB 1705-FN-A, allowing purchase and use of marijuana by adults, regulating the purchase and use of marijuana, and imposing taxes on the wholesale and retail sale of marijuana. MAJORITY: INEXPEDIENT TO LEGISLATE. MINORITY: OUGHT TO PASS.

Rep. Kenneth Kreis for the Majority of Criminal Justice and Public Safety: This bill was presented as a “victimless crime” and would allow the purchase and use of marijuana by 21 year olds and over, would regulate the purchase and sale of marijuana, imposes taxes on the wholesale and retail sale. This bill also created a complete new level of bureaucracy and rule making authority. Vote 10-7.

Rep. Mark Warden for the Minority of Criminal Justice and Public Safety: The minority believes tax and regulate is the model to deal with this matter. Putting the control, regulation, taxation, and sale in the hands of government and reputable business instead of that of the criminal element is the proper course. The time has come to look closely at the downside of current policy. A concern often raised is this will still be illegal under the federal law. Our neighbors Maine, Massachusetts, Rhode Island and Vermont, among others, have legalized some form of marijuana, including medical use, with only rare instances of the feds cracking down on legally operated businesses. There is precedent in New Hampshire for exercising 10th Amendment state sovereignty, including our rejection of Real ID and the current efforts to block Obamacare-mandated health insurance exchanges. Taxing and regulating marijuana would lead to an increase in revenues into state coffers, allowing for reduction of taxes elsewhere or adding to the rainy day fund. Tax receipts would far surpass regulatory and enforcement costs, as we see today with sales of tobacco and alcohol. People in the Live Free or Die state should be free to engage in activities they enjoy, as long as they are not harming others or infringing on others’ rights. Such behaviors are protected by the NH constitution’s Art. 2 Part I guarantee of natural rights. Art. 18 Part I further exhorts that penalties should be proportioned to the crimes. Clearly, a felony or even misdemeanor for simple possession of under an ounce of marijuana for personal, recreational use is disproportionate and Draconian. Seeing that in the history of mankind no one has ever died from ingesting it, the evidence is clear, the policy has created far more harm than good. If we asserted our state rights and took control over this matter, taxed it and regulated it, we would save millions of dollars, free up law enforcement to focus on more serious matters, and fill the coffers with millions of dollars that could be used toward more serious societal ills.
 
Back
Top