Cop Sexually Assaults Woman in Courthouse, is Arrested As Judge Ignores Her Pleas

Last edited:
Came to post this, search turned up AF's Police Abuse thread and led here.

A couple things to consider.

Not only is the Marshall guilty of the felony of sexual assault, but there is the ADDED and even MORE heinous felony of "acting under “color of law” willfully to deprive or conspire to deprive a person of a right protected by the Constitution."

Now onto the Judge, if the driver of a getaway car (or even someone passed out drunk in the back seat) can be charged with murder in an armed robbery gone wrong even if he didn't pull the trigger, then the Judge should be charged here with conspiracy under the color of law to deprive.

If NOTHING else, she needs to be immediately disbarred for bearing witness to an active felony not 15 foot away and turning her back to the victim while she was being victimized. This stands in violation of everything a Judge is supposed to stand for under the bar.

The Marshall has been fired, but that is clearly not good enough. He is clearly guilty of at least two major felonies, and the Judge is guilty of at least one major felony - and she (edit) had been fired, but not disbarred.

There is NO EXCUSE for this Judge to still be allowed to serve in any capacity. She is obviously not fit to be a Judge. BOTH of them need to be charged, tried, and convicted; but that Judge needs disbarred immediately.
 
Last edited:
Not only is the Marshall guilty of the felony of sexual assault, but there is the ADDED and even MORE heinous felony of "acting under “color of law” willfully to deprive or conspire to deprive a person of a right protected by the Constitution."
Click to expand...

This is why I think for officers the only penalty allowed should be death. For everything. Don't take that job if you're not willing to follow your own doggone laws.
 
LibertyEagle said:
I was coming over here to post this. Just UNBELIEVABLE!!! This deserves much more than just firing. All of the government employees in that room should be brought up on charges.
Click to expand...

con·spir·a·cy
/kənˈspirəsē/Noun
1.A secret plan by a group to do something unlawful or harmful.
Click to expand...

Evidence that the Just-Us system conspired against her.
 
Thanks for the bump, y'all. I'll make sure to sign that. Remember that vid AF posted of the poor woman who was needlessly strip searched and tazed (and killed, IIRC)? Haunting and sickening. :( :mad:
 
Man, when you start peeling away the layers of the corrupt state onion, you find there's much more rotten from these cast of characters history. Rule of Law is gone... When you commit felonies on the taxpayers, all you have to do is change positions or quit. The state decides which rights you will have and obviously, violate any of them they wish.

Judgepedia: Patricia Doninger
http://judgepedia.org/index.php/Patricia_Doninger

Demoted Family Court supervisor starts new job as marshal
http://www.reviewjournal.com/news/c...amily-court-supervisor-starts-new-job-marshal

Lt. Steve Rushfield possible scapegoat for some higher-ups in the court
http://lasvegastribune.net/lt-steve-rushfield-scapegoat-higherups-court/

Family Court marshal(Bailiff) supervisor steps down
http://www.reviewjournal.com/news/crime-courts/family-court-marshal-supervisor-steps-down

Clark County Court to Patricia Doninger: YOU’RE FIRED
http://lasvegastribune.net/clark-county-court-patricia-doninger-youre-fire/


Patricia Doning - AVVO Rating
http://www.avvo.com/attorneys/89101-nv-patricia-doninger-4280800.html
Patricia Doninger

Rating
Good <========== WTF?

6.5
icon_rating_06-c3b065c45840e13035d16ad01bcd3b4b.gif



Experience

[TD="class: image"]
Industry Recognition
Professional Conduct

[TD="class: image"]
[/TD]

[TD="class: image"]
[/TD]
[/TD]
[TD="class: image"][/TD]

[TD="class: image"][/TD]

[TD="class: image"][/TD]
What is the Avvo Rating?


Client Reviews
Not yet reviewed
Current or former client? Write a review

No professional misconduct <===== :rolleyes:
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
The only way to have rule of law, realistically, is to have free entry and competition in the field of conflict-resolution provision. Multiple conflict-resolution providers, all of whom are bound by each other and their clients to follow the rule of law, will tend to have to be law-abiding.

To give one company an enforced monopoly on supplying conflict-resolution -- even in conflicts involving themselves! -- is obviously a recipe for disaster. No one, if presented with that idea, would go along with it, I think. It is so ludicrisly unjust and certain to lead to abuses by the monopolist. Who would agree to such a thing?

Well almost everyone would, it turns out, including even many on this board, but only through lies, obfuscation, and propaganda. We need to educate them.

Otherwise, these outrages will never end. Never. They will become more and more and more sickeningly common. Then they will cease to be outrages. They will become the norm.
 
helmuth_hubener said:
The only way to have rule of law, realistically, is to have free entry and competition in the field of conflict-resolution provision. Multiple conflict-resolution providers, all of whom are bound by each other and their clients to follow the rule of law, will tend to have to be law-abiding.

To give one company an enforced monopoly on supplying conflict-resolution -- even in conflicts involving themselves! -- is obviously a recipe for disaster. No one, if presented with that idea, would go along with it, I think. It is so ludicrisly unjust and certain to lead to abuses by the monopolist. Who would agree to such a thing?

Well almost everyone would, it turns out, including even many on this board, but only through lies, obfuscation, and propaganda. We need to educate them.

Otherwise, these outrages will never end. Never. They will become more and more and more sickeningly common. Then they will cease to be outrages. They will become the norm.
Click to expand...
+rep This is but one of dozens of conflicting interests in classical American theory of law/justice/governance.
 
I don't know why anybody is complaining. You chumps consider yourselves lucky. The mother was not tazed, the 2 year old was not zip tied, and I don't see any dogs being shot.
 
kcchiefs6465 said:
Here's one that will surely piss you off. Woman is arrested after refusing to recant her statement that an officer sexually assaulted her. Judge ignores her cries and instead plays with the woman's two year old daughter. Daughter begs the officer in question not to take her mommy. :mad:


Click to expand...


This world is crack-smokin' insane.

If Jesus has plans on a return engagement, he really needs to bump his schedule up.

WAY up.
 
A concern I had about this incident is that the judge’s position could have very well been that she had no authority to intervene with the making of an arrest that officers had themselves initiated. It might have been her thought that she could be held internally accountable for doing so. However, in either case, it is highly disconcerting that she did not even bother reasoning the actions being taken by those LEO’, or at the very least make a phone-call for the LEO’ supervisor to respond, while keeping in mind that she was a family law judge, however should still have at least possessed a basic understanding of how criminal due process functions.

Further noting that it is utterly outrageous that the sole basis for the arrest was because the female had just attempted to establish a public record alleging that an armed courthouse employee had just attempted to grope her in a private side-room and that she was then refusing to instantly go back on that public record to recant those allegations as being demanded by the supposed perpetrator of those allegations himself.

Also noting the other thread started regarding that other judge’s lack of concern for that man that was slammed into a glass wall by a deputy in the courtroom.
 
[.......]
Even though Fox was fired, sources tell the I-Team, Clark County courts are widening their investigation into why this incident, and a growing number of assault allegations, were never reported by family court management to internal affairs.

Fox maintains his innocence and is suing Clark County for wrongful termination. His attorney declined an on-camera interview but claims the marshal's arrest was legal because nobody in the courtroom tried to stop him.
Click to expand...

hxxp://www.8newsnow.com/story/21557505/cover-up-alleged-in-clark-clark-family-court

LAS VEGAS -- The former family court marshal accused of sexually touching a woman who appeared in Family Court will be able to sue Clark County.

Former marshal Ron Fox, who was fired after an internal affairs investigation, did win a victory in court Tuesday. A judge will allow him to sue Clark County. Fox's attorney claims Fox wasn't fired according to the rules.

The I-Team broke the story in March 2013 and the video that led to the marshal's firing gained national notoriety. The courtroom video shows a woman claiming a family court marshal touched her breasts and the hearing master on the bench ignoring her pleas for justice.

The incident took place when Monica Contreras went to family court in Aug. 2011 for a routine hearing. She accused Fox, a court marshal, of taking her into another room and touching her breasts while searching for drugs. The search was not ordered by any judge.

"Ms. Contreras alleges that Mr. Fox used that lie to persuade her, coerce her, gain her consent to allow a hands on physical pat-down touch of her," said Robert Freeman, a Clark County attorney.

The video shows that when Contreras refused to recant her accusation as ordered by Fox, the marshal arrested her for the so-called charge of "making a false accusation against a peace officer." While this was occurring, Hearing Master Patricia Doninger played with Contreras' daughter instead of listening to Contreras' courtroom pleas.

"Why won't you listen to me?" Contreras pleaded in the video.

Doninger was terminated after the I-Team investigation, according to Senior Judge Charles McGee. Marshal Ron Fox was terminated after an internal affairs investigation validated Contreras' claims. But it is the hearing master's lack of action that forms the core of Fox's attempt to get his job back with back pay.

"The so-called egregious actions that he's accused of, which he denies, occurred in the presence, and with the acquiescence of a court commissioner. It wasn't as if there wasn't somebody decked with the full authority and prestige of the court in a black robe sitting there at the time," said Adam Levine, Fox's attorney.

Judge McGee decided that Fox has the right to sue Clark County for his job back. Clark County tried and failed to stay out of Fox's lawsuit. Fox's attorney says his client never got a fair chance to defend himself to internal affairs investigators before he was fired. Fox does still faces a lawsuit from Contreras and a federal grand jury investigation looking into a growing list of family court marshal abuse claims.

"I can't comment at all on the grand jury, but I can comment that a lot of the attention, you're responsible for," Levine said. "I think this case has been over sensationalized in the press. I don't know if it was just a slow news day or whatnot."

Fox had nothing to say to the I-Team. He only shook his head slightly in apparent disagreement when Clark County's attorney laid out the accusations against him.
Click to expand...
hxxp://www.8newsnow.com/story/23396490/i-team-family-court-marshal-wins-right-to-sue
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Origanalist
Cop Arrested and Fired for Kicking an 8-month Pregnant Woman in the Stomach
Replies
13
Views
717
TheTexan
TheTexan
dannno
'A SON SPEAKS OUT' In Defense of Woody Allen
Replies
0
Views
329
dannno
dannno
Occam's Banana
On-Duty Cop Rapes, Beats, Urinates on Woman, Pleads Guilty - No Jail
Replies
10
Views
794
brushfire
brushfire
Anti Federalist
UT-Woman calls cops for help after traffic accident. Gets groped and arrested instead.
Replies
18
Views
1K
sam1952
sam1952
presence
Breast-feeding landed her in jail
Replies
3
Views
429
Occam's Banana
Occam's Banana
Back
Top