Cop Sexually Assaults Woman in Courthouse, is Arrested As Judge Ignores Her Pleas

[tangowhiskeykilo]

3 bullets 1 gun. Fucking disgusting.

 

[helmuth_hubener]

I was coming over here to post this. Just UNBELIEVABLE!!! This deserves much more than just firing. All of the government employees in that room should be brought up on charges.

Don't act surprised. What did you think would happen if you give one group of people a monopoly on dispute resolution, including disputes involving themselves? Such a monopoly is such a totally laughable idea, or it would be, except for the fact that non-ancaps defend it so tenaciously as The Way Things Oughtta Be(TM), and thus this ridiculous system has actually been implemented (!!!) and of course results in the special monopolist group doing whatever they want, because who's going to stop them? Not the 99% of people with a religious conviction that their monopoly is holy and good. Not them.

So complain. By all means complain about the behavior of the monopoly group. The more complaints the better. But don't be shocked. Don't be surprised. We've seen it all before, and we'll continue to see it forever, until the truly stupid idea of giving one group of people a monopoly on ultimate dispute resolution goes away. Because they just are not going to rule against themselves very often. It will get worse and worse. Soon they will just be raping everyone. Rape will be a standard and accepted part of the criminal justice system. Everyone will joke about it like it's really funny.

Oh wait, that already happened. My bad. Well, what's next? Cannibalism, I suppose. So there's your choice: a free market in justice provision, or secret courts where the accused will be whisked off to secret prisons where their fellow inmates will eat them.

 

[Mini-Me]

Who is going to fire them? Who is going to move criminal charges forward? Such is the problem with endemic systemic corruption...

 

[helmuth_hubener]

Who is going to fire them? Who is going to move criminal charges forward? Such is the problem with endemic systemic corruption...

Such is the problem with giving one group a monopoly on ultimate dispute resolution. It's just a stupid, stupid, epically stupid idea. Getting groped, as totally evil as it is, is the least of it. That's the sad thing.

 

[Red Green]

3 bullets 1 gun. Fucking disgusting.

6 bullets. Don't forget to double-tap.

 

[otherone]

Well, what's next? Cannibalism, I suppose. So there's your choice: a free market in justice provision, or secret courts where the accused will be whisked off to secret prisons where their fellow inmates will eat them.

ROFL.
I like the cut of your jib, sir!

 

[kcchiefs6465]

Such is the problem with giving one group a monopoly on ultimate dispute resolution. It's just a stupid, stupid, epically stupid idea. Getting groped, as totally evil as it is, is the least of it. That's the sad thing.

Part of the problem here, aside from the fact that they hired a pervert, is the out of control drug laws which was the premise for the search. Add in the complete lack of compassion from a soulless Judge (probably lost that one of the hundreds of people she sentenced to jail who were begging similarly) and this is what happens. Now the pig is suing for his job back, what a joke. The crazy thing being he will probably get that and back pay.

I read your other post and generally like your posts but do not myself see how private courts would work. I do not see how they would be better either. (I can see a few hypothetical situations where conflicts of interest could, and would, one day arise) I'm just not quite there.

A couple solutions to the current solution would be vastly reducing the number of laws. Outright eliminate most all non-violent crimes and scale back the authority of the judges. Make sure they are aware of false imprisonment punishments and should one get absurd with their authority, make an example. (along with disbarring) Next we could vastly cut the number of po-lice. Examples should be made of them as well when they violate a person's rights. Public oversight should be key. Lawsuits and settlements should be paid out of the offending officer's pocket. These are just a few quick example of action that could be taken to where we try and cut out the cancer and save some. Day by day with the more I see I am coming to the side of completely abolishing it all. I'm just not quite ready to say that. I probably need to become more knowledgeable of how the system you propose would work.

My book list is pretty long right now, but I'll be reading some Rothbard soon. I know the judicial system is pretty much broken, I just don't know what the exact solution would be. Forgive the cliche but it seems that it could be a necessary evil. We'd just have to revisit the concept and limit the scope of their power.

 

[helmuth_hubener]

I approve of all your proposals, KC.

Private courts could work any number of ways, but in a few historical cases where countries actually had private courts (ancient Israel, medieval Iceland and Ireland), how it basically worked was this:

You have a number of elders in the community, old and respected men considered to be wise. When some dispute arises, those involved (or at least the one who feels he was wronged) will bring the complaint to one of them. If he is an agreeable judge to both/all parties, he resolves it. If anyone feels he'd have a conflict of interest, or just doesn't like him or whatever, you find someone else everybody can agree on. There is an appeals process as well.

The key is just that there's more than one elder in town. And, also important, you could even go to another town for justice if you didn't think it would be possible to get it from anyone in town in some extreme circumstance. So if, say, you come before the elder and his henchman violates your modesty or even your honor, you don't have to depend on that very elder for justice. You can go across town and tell Elder Samuel the story of what happened at Elder Issachar's court, and he can arbitrate in the matter.

So there's no monopoly. So everyone has accountability.

When you have a monopoly, there's no accountability. There's no oversight Who are they accountable to? Oversight from whom? Themselves!

Now in this case it was a serious enough offense, with enough evidence, that she can make a federal case of it. She can object to the higher gov't level against the lower one. So in this particular instance, she has a situation with some quasi-competition, because there's the multiple levels of gov't that are not always in love with each other and going to back each other up, for various reasons. There's some chance for redress. That is not always the case. In fact, it rarely is the case. In a competitive justice system, it would always be the case.

 

[Tod]

I wonder if the judge is just too intimidated by the cop to intervene?

 

[brushfire]

Where's Marv and the wolves when you need them?

 

[amy31416]

I wonder if the judge is just too intimidated by the cop to intervene?

She should be "de-throned" if that's the case. No matter what the case, that should happen. No sympathy from me.

 

[kcchiefs6465]

She should be "de-throned" if that's the case. No matter what the case, that should happen. No sympathy from me.

Same here. It actually seemed more to me that she was desensitized from people's pleas and cries. Sitting on her high horse all day casting judgements while holding the power to imprison someone for not promptly removing their hat, for example, might do something to a person's character. She is unfit to be a judge. I hope the robe gets sued off her back.

The way she played with the woman's daughter put this incident on another level. The whole damn thing, really. We are going to have to follow this one. The officer is suing for his job back. A couple years down the line this pervert will probably be groping someone else.

 

[Anti Federalist]

Why don't all of you pipe down?

Your cop bashing, cursing, anger, hollering and threats of violence are making us all look bad.

Some strongly worded and well thought out letters of disapproval will take care of this.

 

[sluggo]

A new way to get screwed in family court.

 

[Anti Federalist]

A new way to get screwed in family court.

Didn't think that was even possible.

 

[Occam's Banana]

Meh. These are just a few bad apples. Excuse me: alleged bad apples.

I mean, have there been any kind of charges or trials? No? Well, then, there you go.

Don't you believe in "innocent until proven guilty in a court of law," citizen?

Now move along, mundane. Nothing to see here, nothing to see ...

 

[Anti Federalist]

////

 

[PaulConventionWV]

Here's one that will surely piss you off. Woman is arrested after refusing to recant her statement that an officer sexually assaulted her. Judge ignores her cries and instead plays with the woman's two year old daughter. Daughter begs the officer in question not to take her mommy.

I am horrified at the evil that was on display here. This is pure evil that I didn't even think possible except perhaps in movies until now. I can only say my heart bleeds for that woman because this is just unforgiveable. We all know the judge will suffer no consequences. The guy getting fired? That's a laugh. He should be locked up. Now he's suing the county.

 

[Anti Federalist]

I am horrified at the evil that was on display here. This is pure evil that I didn't even think possible except perhaps in movies until now. I can only say my heart bleeds for that woman because this is just unforgiveable. We all know the judge will suffer no consequences. The guy getting fired? That's a laugh. He should be locked up. Now he's suing the county.

Orders will be followed.

Policy will be enforced.

Compliance will be achieved.

And most of your fellow citizens will cheer it on, when it happens to you.

And me...

 

[PaulConventionWV]

So does anyone still believe that people who say we should get rid of government altogether are extremists?

Non sequitur. Please leave this thread and don't come back.