Conversation with a rich uncle

ShaneEnochs

Member
Joined
Oct 20, 2011
Messages
4,298
So my uncle worked in a steel mill for most of his life, became an investor for about 5 years, and then decided to opened up a small grocery chain (3 stores) since he didn't know what to do with his time. He's almost 80 now, and I wanted to get his view on the economy.

He said that becoming an investor taught him a lot about how the economy works, and said trickle down economics absolutely doesn't work, and that it was preposterous to think that somehow giving the rich more tax breaks equated to more jobs. He said that he lost a lot of money as an investor at first because he focused more on net income of companies rather than than sales. Companies used all kinds of tax tricks to save money, but the problem was no one was buying the products and services, and eventually the companies usually went under and my uncle lost a lot of money that way.

He said when he opened his first grocery store, even though the store brought in a lot of money, there was no incentive to hire new employees. He said while his pockets kept getting fuller, his 8 or so employees made about $8.00, and he had no reason to hire anyone else because they did a fine job of keeping the store going. Then eventually he did open up two more grocery stores and hired more people, but he said that was more out of boredom than anything. He was perfectly content with his one grocery store.

I'm not entirely sure how much money he has, but I know it's several million. For whatever reason, he votes democrat and says that he fully supports higher taxes on the rich and little to no taxes on anyone who makes below $80,000. This surprised me, and I asked him if he thought a voluntary tax system would work where the rich could pay as much as they wanted to. He said absolutely not, because up until a couple years ago, he wouldn't consider ever paying more because the more money you make, the greedier you become. But now he has such an excess of money, he's so old, and he doesn't really know what to do with his money. So he's satiated.

I suggested that taxation is stealing since you had no choice to pay it. He said he believed taxation was necessary because people are not created equally, regardless of what people might say. He used to live in a one bedroom shack with my grandparents, my dad, and my other uncle, but he had the ambition to make a better life for himself. Not everyone has this kind ambition, and it's not something that you can just develop. He said he saw a lot of hardworking stupid people, and he saw a lot of intelligent lazy people in his life. He didn't feel that either person was at fault, but it was somewhat just in the cards that they would never achieve what others would be able to. He said some people just absolutely need to be cared for, and he'd rather live in a country that took care of its citizenry than allow a more Darwin approach.

Anyway, I thought his view was pretty interesting, and it has kind of changed a lot of my views on the subject. Maybe there is no black and white. Maybe everything really is gray, and compromise is absolutely needed.
 
Last edited:
The "Darwinian" system in which he states, is the only system that doesn't allow for elitist fuckheads to rob those they feel are beneath them. Everyone is created equal. But sadly "equality" is represented by material assets. This mentality is a disease of the mind.
 
The "Darwinian" system in which he states, is the only system that doesn't allow for elitist fuckheads to rob those they feel are beneath them. Everyone is created equal. But sadly "equality" is represented by material assets. This mentality is a disease of the mind.

You believe everyone is born with the same opportunities?
 
Trickle down economics don't matter. That is just a Democrat talking point to argue against Reagan. It is irrelevant. People have a right to keep their property and forced redistribution by government taxation is simply immoral. Your uncle did not owe anyone a job and if he didn't want to open a 2nd store that is his prerogative. His millions would be much more productively put to use by him decided where he wants to donate them rather than the government taking them and redistributing to special interests. Let the rich uncles make their choice in a free market, not some crooked politician.
 
Maybe there is no black and white. Maybe everything really is gray, and compromise is absolutely needed.

Nope, it is black and white really. Leaving money in private hands to be used in voluntary exchanges is better than sending it to bureaucrats.

Ask your uncle how he thinks he was able to earn enough money to begin investing and buying grocery stores. It wasn't just his hard work and it certainly had nothing to do with the government. Ask him what he believe his excess production(profit) is doing to society and if it were taken from him, would society be better off?

There is a lot of different ways in which he is misguided and not seeing the entire picture that I don't care to write about.
 
No person is entitled to take more from one person who has worked harder or whose father has worked harder or who was more fortunate , to give to another .Something Jefferson & I agree on. There are and always will be people in need .Something Jesus and I agree on. That is what private charity is for , not Govt.
 
The world is not black-and-white and to believe so is foolish in any subject matter. There is of course a moral high-ground in any comparison of concepts, but the physical world we live in with its layers upon layers of past human action requires some care to wade through. I can't comment on your uncle's triumph; my boss and I are currently going through the same thing with the store I work at and he's your average liberal and a nice guy. These guys aren't the problem.

I mean...We understand that there are natural laws that are inalienable, but there are so many preconceptions in peoples' heads in the modern world that the natural order of things is kind of tainted and just to chip away at the bad parts and misinformation is to bring a spark of good. There is my vague and encompassing comment for the day haha!
 
Successful business men don't necessarily understand the economy any better than a usual worker. Managing a firm and understanding general economic activity have almost nothing in common.

Von Mises was a great economist but there is no indication that he would have been a successful entrepreneur. Similarly, many billionaires have outlandish socialist views of the economy.
 
He said when he opened his first grocery store, even though the store brought in a lot of money, there was no incentive to hire new employees. He said while his pockets kept getting fuller, his 8 or so employees made about $8.00, and he had no reason to hire anyone else because they did a fine job of keeping the store going.

Sounds like they should have asked for a raise. :P

The thing is, we have a federal government that wants to eventually "take care" of everyone, not just the people who are worse off or don't have as much ambition. I would personally settle for a limited federal government, and let the states do the social caretaking. Of course, the states wouldn't be able to do much since they wouldn't have a money printing press.
 
Sounds like they should have asked for a raise. :P

The thing is, we have a federal government that wants to eventually "take care" of everyone, not just the people who are worse off or don't have as much ambition. I would personally settle for a limited federal government, and let the states do the social caretaking. Of course, the states wouldn't be able to do much since they wouldn't have a money printing press.

It's a shame that the rich uncle did not see fit to reward his workers that helped him make his fortune. Even now the rich uncle could seek out those former employees and give them a wonderful gift, since he sees them as less able than himself. Certainly they are well deserving of his self-inflicted redistribution of his wealth. Instead his answer is to ask people in the government to take his money and then use it to purchase drones for killing children. To make it worse it seems that the uncle has guilt and wants to alleviative it by forcing his fellow wealthy citizens to have their money redistributed to the military industrial complex. All of this could have been avoided if he simply would have been a caring and generous person throughout his life rather than becoming greedier as he became wealthier.

The whole thing reminds me of a typical violent asshole in prison that finds Jesus and then feels that everyone else needs to find Jesus because that is what help him turn his life around. It never occurs to him that most people aren't violent assholes and don't have that same need to turn their life around. I am happy that the prisoner stops being a violent asshole and if Jesus it what did it for him, great... more power to him. I just don't want some asshole telling me how to live life because he was doing it wrong for so long.
 
Last edited:
Taking something that doesn't belong to you is wrong. That is black and white.

Whether a particular person needs a handout or needs a kick in the pants is not always black and white. Reasonable people can agree to disagree here.
 
His reasoning is used to fight every war, jail every non-violent offender, and steal half my time and money every year. "People are not created equally"

Initiating violence is wrong. I suggest that your uncle's morals aren't very good and you shouldn't let such a man persuade you. Many a mass grave were dug for the people not created equally.
 
Interesting that now that he is retired he wants huge income taxes? He is a thief or at least a symphathizer of thieves.
 
His reasoning is used to fight every war, jail every non-violent offender, and steal half my time and money every year. "People are not created equally"

Initiating violence is wrong. I suggest that your uncle's morals aren't very good and you shouldn't let such a man persuade you. Many a mass grave were dug for the people not created equally.

No you're definitely right there. He was absolutely cut throat. My dad always told me that my uncle had mafia dealings. I still thought it was an interesting perspective.
 
No you're definitely right there. He was absolutely cut throat. My dad always told me that my uncle had mafia dealings. I still thought it was an interesting perspective.

I wonder how he would feel if the old man were mugged on the street. Would that be an interesting perspective?
 
ShaneEnochs,

The way I heard it used to work was that the person that put up the money would get a fifty percent share of the profits and those that provided the labor would split up the other fifty percent. Of course if your Uncle provided some of the labor that should have been taken into account.

I think we have strayed way off of a fair business model.
 
Sounds like they should have asked for a raise. :P

The thing is, we have a federal government that wants to eventually "take care" of everyone, not just the people who are worse off or don't have as much ambition. I would personally settle for a limited federal government, and let the states do the social caretaking. Of course, the states wouldn't be able to do much since they wouldn't have a money printing press.

Or opened their own stores.

Or went in together on one for that matter.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top