Contact Al-Jazeera For a New Documentary About Us & RP

[VoteForRonPaul]

Mention Al-Jazeera and RP in the same sentence on any national news program and set back the liberty movement 50 years. What an incredibly STUPID idea!

Well, thanks for coming in.



Mention the constituion and RP in the same sentence on any national news program and set back the liberty movement 50 years.


Mention peace and RP in the same sentence on any national news program and set back the liberty movement 50 years.


Mention prosperity and RP in the same sentence on any national news program and set back the liberty movement 50 years.


Mention integrity and RP in the same sentence on any national news program and set back the liberty movement 50 years.


Mention consistency and RP in the same sentence on any national news program and set back the liberty movement 50 years.


Mention the war on Iraq and RP in the same sentence on any national news program and set back the liberty movement 50 years.


Mention civil liberties and RP in the same sentence on any national news program and set back the liberty movement 50 years.


Mention the first amendment and RP in the same sentence on any national news program and set back the liberty movement 50 years.


Mention the income tax and RP in the same sentence on any national news program and set back the liberty movement 50 years.


Mention the gold standard and RP in the same sentence on any national news program and set back the liberty movement 50 years.


Mention special interests and RP in the same sentence on any national news program and set back the liberty movement 50 years.


Mention freedom and RP in the same sentence on any national news program and set back the liberty movement 50 years.



In this case 50 years is worth waiting!
.
.
.
.

 

[davidkachel]

Well, thanks for coming in.



Mention the constituion and RP in the same sentence on any national news program and set back the liberty movement 50 years.


Mention peace and RP in the same sentence on any national news program and set back the liberty movement 50 years.


Mention prosperity and RP in the same sentence on any national news program and set back the liberty movement 50 years.


Mention integrity and RP in the same sentence on any national news program and set back the liberty movement 50 years.


Mention consistency and RP in the same sentence on any national news program and set back the liberty movement 50 years.


Mention the war on Iraq and RP in the same sentence on any national news program and set back the liberty movement 50 years.


Mention civil liberties and RP in the same sentence on any national news program and set back the liberty movement 50 years.


Mention the first amendment and RP in the same sentence on any national news program and set back the liberty movement 50 years.


Mention the income tax and RP in the same sentence on any national news program and set back the liberty movement 50 years.


Mention the gold standard and RP in the same sentence on any national news program and set back the liberty movement 50 years.


Mention special interests and RP in the same sentence on any national news program and set back the liberty movement 50 years.


Mention freedom and RP in the same sentence on any national news program and set back the liberty movement 50 years.



In this case 50 years is worth waiting!
.
.
.
.

So, umm... you don't see any difference between liberty, prosperity, peace, integrity, the Constitution, etc. and Al-Jazeera!!????

Have you been out of touch?

 

[VoteForRonPaul]

So, umm... you don't see any difference between liberty, prosperity, peace, integrity, the Constitution, etc. and Al-Jazeera!!????

Have you been out of touch?

Sorry you did not get the point!

 

[davidkachel]

Sorry you did not get the point!

No! I did get the point.

 

[VoteForRonPaul]

No! I did get the point.

Well, I am glad you did. That is a proof of progress!

 

[VoteForRonPaul]

I support the idea on the basis of a cultural brigde.

+1

And that reason resides in the heart of Ron Paul message.

+1000

 

[davidkachel]

Well, I am glad you did. That is a proof of progress!

You shouldn't be.

 

[VoteForRonPaul]

Bump

 

[xCakex]

Interesting idea.

 

[VoteForRonPaul]

Interesting idea.

Thanks for all those who support the idea.
If anybody likes it, please do not wait. Make sure to send a request demanding the documentary. Everything starts by you! Without the individual efforts, it will not come into effect.

 

[slacker921]

I think this is a bad idea.

However, they're already doing quite a bit of reporting on the US election and even have a poll up here
http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/91D4E785-6C56-4369-8FE0-704C5259C4E7.htm
which is really interesting if you believe the results. They show huge support for Romney in the middle east. Heh.

 

[VoteForRonPaul]

I think this is a bad idea.

However, they're already doing quite a bit of reporting on the US election and even have a poll up here
http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/91D4E785-6C56-4369-8FE0-704C5259C4E7.htm
which is really interesting if you believe the results. They show huge support for Romney in the middle east. Heh.

Thanks for the link, I did not dig so much in Al-Jazeera website before, but this is very interesting.
In the Middle East, Mitt is getting 75.6% while RP in second by 14% which is not bad. So let us analyze the results. There are two assumptions on why this is happening?
First: the total of the results from around the world is about 9000 votes. The number of people who voted for Mitt might not be as huge as you might think. As example if only 100 people voted from the Middle East that means Mitt got 75 votes while RP got 15.
The second assumption says that Israel is part of the Middle East and we all know that the people there are watching the American elections very carefully more than anybody else and therefore all votes for Mitt most likely is coming from there.
I do not see any reason why the people in the Middle East would vote for Mitt unless if they are fascinated with the Olympics and I would not blame them
Any way Mitt is out which leaves RP as a winner.

But I really would like to know why you think this is a bad idea?

 

[Mordan]

No! I did get the point.

I think this thread is a test for a RP supporter.

If you are against spreading the RP's message on Al Jazeera, please go back to your books and educate yourself more on Ron Paul's message.

Forget for awhile that you have to convince american sheeps plugged on their TV set.

 

[VoteForRonPaul]

Bump

 

[VoteForRonPaul]

Bump for the documentary

 

[josh24601]

Maybe Osama can give him a shoutout in his next videotape.

 

[ClayTrainor]

E-mail sent!

 

[VoteForRonPaul]

Maybe Osama can give him a shoutout in his next videotape.

Ron Paul is a great thinker and he does not mind to sit down with anyone even if it was an enemy. Al-Jazeera is not an enemy as you try to reflect(Actually both Al-Jazeera Arabic & English are allowed to broadcast in the US even in the Bush era).
So do you think that RP would refuse to be interviewed by Al-Jazeera? Or he will reject an offer of making a documentary about him and the revolution?

 

[Ex Post Facto]

Osama needs to come out and say, "If the American people elected Ron Paul, we would have no more need to feel threatened by tyranny in the Middle East and would therefore stop any effort for our quest of Freedom from oppression but the Bush regime."

-kidding sorta

 

[eok321]

Good Idea....probably one of the best sources of real news outside of the internets