yongrel Member Joined Jun 9, 2007 Messages 9,112 Apr 6, 2008 #5 jgrif33 said: That platform supports enforcing obscenity laws. I'll take that over the neocon globalist party anyday. Click to expand... obscenity laws = restricting freedom of speech. That ain't kosher in my book.
jgrif33 said: That platform supports enforcing obscenity laws. I'll take that over the neocon globalist party anyday. Click to expand... obscenity laws = restricting freedom of speech. That ain't kosher in my book.
A ARealConservative Member Joined May 16, 2007 Messages 4,823 Apr 6, 2008 #6 jgrif33 said: That platform supports enforcing obscenity laws. I'll take that over the neocon globalist party anyday. Click to expand... one size fits all enforcement is not constitutional - at the federal level they need to clarify what their intentions truly are.
jgrif33 said: That platform supports enforcing obscenity laws. I'll take that over the neocon globalist party anyday. Click to expand... one size fits all enforcement is not constitutional - at the federal level they need to clarify what their intentions truly are.
driller80545 Member Joined Nov 15, 2007 Messages 1,697 Apr 7, 2008 #8 Turn the channel. Then write in RP.
Y Young Paleocon Member Joined Mar 26, 2008 Messages 1,076 Apr 7, 2008 #9 Personally i think it would be great if Libertarian and Constitution party members work with RP Republicans in somewhat of an alliance to challenge the 2 party dominance, and write in Dr. Paul in November.
Personally i think it would be great if Libertarian and Constitution party members work with RP Republicans in somewhat of an alliance to challenge the 2 party dominance, and write in Dr. Paul in November.
VaderM5 Member Joined Jan 3, 2008 Messages 179 Apr 7, 2008 #10 yongrel said: Ah yes, the anti-porn party. Click to expand... Same could be said about the Republican party.
yongrel said: Ah yes, the anti-porn party. Click to expand... Same could be said about the Republican party.