bunklocoempire
Member
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2007
- Messages
- 6,990
What, specifically do you mean by "the harm that she has already approved of"?
Is there anyone else in DC speaking the truth about the fact that "Regime Changing" Assad is actually illegal? If there is, they have my support as well. Maybe if Rand hadn't spent the first debate by charging at Trump he could have said more about this illegal and unconstitutional "regime change" policy that has been going on for years and years. The American people don't seem to care much, hopefully Tulsi can help.
U.S. Congresswoman: CIA Must Stop Illegal, Counterproductive War to Overthrow Assad
These wars are the most important thing right now. FFS some of these idiots are trying to provoke Russia RIGHT NOW. The warmongers and crooks have already stolen trillions of dollars from you, me and the next few generations. It's a disaster. To be fair to Rand, he is the next best thing (which isn't saying a lot) but for a Democrat to call this regime change illegal is a leap ahead.
![]()
Figures from September 2014- Click to find out what they are now http://costofwar.com/
So until someone else better comes along I'm 100% behind Tulsi Gabbard. One who isn't afraid to fight her own party and tell the truth.
Good for you. 27 years of watching and living with the results of US/military/Hawaii politics, gives me a different perspective.
Post 37 explains my thoughts on it and a prediction.
Thanks to Ron Paul for upping the truth-ante.
EDIT harm = TG voting record
Last edited: