Congressman Walter Jones Exposes Massive 9/11 Conspiracy [who financed hijackers?]

[coastie]

Are you seriously saying that the Palestinians are not a problem?

For ME?!?!?!?!?! For this COUNTRY?!?!?!


Yep, that's what I'm seriously saying, shill. Go fuck yourself, and please don't let the door hit you in the ass on the way out.

 

[RickyJ]

Frankly, I am excited about the future Israel-Saudi alliance. This will take care of the Palestinian problem and Iran will be in the dustbin of history.

http://www.jewishpress.com/news/bre...tunity-for-israeli-saudi-alliance/2013/11/26/

Frankly I am excited about the Russian-China-Pakistan-Iran alliance, this will take care of the Israeli problem and leave Israel in the dustbin of history.

 

[coastie]

Frankly I am excited about the Russian-China-Pakistan-Iran alliance, this will take care of the Israeli problem and leave Israel in the dustbin of history.

LMAO, thread winner, sir!

+rep

 

[jmdrake]

Somebody in America funded the hijackers and then blew up WTC 7.

Two issues. 1) Even Ron Paul, whom most here think is not a truther (though I wonder if he secretly is) has questions about what happened to WTC 7, because the NIST "guestimate" is shady at best. 2) The evidence that's been there for a while and is apparently a part of this classified report is that Saudi money financed the attacks. But Riggs bank got was used to launder money to the hijackers.

Who is al-Bayoumi? At various times, the affable father of four told people that he was getting his doctorate at San Diego State, though the school has no record he ever attended. He told others that he was a pilot for the Saudi national airline. He apparently did work for Dallah Avco, an aviation-services company with extensive contracts with the Saudi Ministry of Defense and Aviation, headed by Prince Sultan, the father of the Saudi ambassador to the United States, Prince Bandar. According to informed sources, some federal investigators suspect that al-Bayoumi could have been an advance man for the 9-11 hijackers, sent by Al Qaeda to assist the plot that ultimately claimed 3,000 lives.

The Feds' interest in al-Bayoumi has been heightened by a money trail that could be perfectly innocent, but is nonetheless intriguing—and could ultimately expose the Saudi government to some of the blame for 9-11 and seriously strain U.S.-Saudi ties. It is too soon to say where the trail will wind up, but it begins with a very surprising name on a Washington bank account.

About two months after al-Bayoumi began aiding Alhazmi and Almihdhar, NEWSWEEK has learned, al-Bayoumi's wife began receiving regular stipends, often monthly and usually around $2,000, totaling tens of thousands of dollars. The money came in the form of cashier's checks, purchased from Washington's Riggs Bank by Princess Haifa bint Faisal, the daughter of the late King Faisal and wife of Prince Bandar, the Saudi envoy who is a prominent Washington figure and personal friend of the Bush family. The checks were sent to a woman named Majeda Ibrahin Dweikat, who in turn signed over many of them to al-Bayoumi's wife (and her friend), Manal Ahmed Bagader. The Feds want to know: Was this well-meaning charity gone awry? Or some elaborate money-laundering scheme? A scam? Or just a coincidence?

A spokesperson for Princess Haifa told NEWSWEEK that she had no idea the money was going to the al-Bayoumi family or that it might in any way be used for some nefarious purpose. Saudi officials and members of the royal family routinely give money to supplicants who need medical or financial help and write the embassy. Dweikat's husband, Osama Basnan, had first pleaded to the Saudi Embassy for help in 1998, saying that he needed money to treat his wife's thyroid condition. At the time, Prince Bandar wrote Basnan a $15,000 check. The monthly payments to his wife, Majeda, began in January 1999 and ended only last summer. Until she was contacted late last week by NEWSWEEK, Princess Haifa was unaware that the payments are being investigated by U.S. authorities, according to the spokesperson.

So the facts are that we have a Saudi national with ties to the Bush family laundering money to terrorists using a bank where a Bush family member was the CEO.

Try to laugh it off all you want to. I don't think the families of those killed find it funny.

 

[jmdrake]

I know it's fun to blame Saudi Arabia for supporting terrorism, but frankly there is no evidence to support that. The government of Saudi Arabia cracks down on al-Qaeda in its own country.

I also know that its fun to engage in conspiracy theories regarding Israel and 9/11, but that is just anti-Semitic stuff that has no place on a Ron Paul forum which is dedicated to supporting his son Rand.

Frankly, I am excited about the future Israel-Saudi alliance. This will take care of the Palestinian problem and Iran will be in the dustbin of history.

http://www.jewishpress.com/news/bre...tunity-for-israeli-saudi-alliance/2013/11/26/

I know "InRonITrust's" megaphone account has been banned. That said, this shows the type of mentality we are up against. A sitting congressman says that the redacted 9/11 report fingers an ally of the U.S., and most other sources, including former 9/11 commissioner Bob Graham, say that the ally fingered is Saudi Arabia, and yet we still have someone saying "There's no evidence of that" followed by "If you look into this you're anti-Semetic". Not just "anti-Israel" but "anti-Semetic". Ummm....okay. Technically Arabs are Semites, but Palestinians are Arabs so they are also Semites. Folks, quit falling for this "There's no evidence of this or that" claptrap or "If you question the official story you're a racist" garbage!

 

[dillo]

No, haven't you ever played with firecrackers? Explosions cause stuff to go away from the detonation point. Now if you told me they found 100 passports rubber banded together sitting nicely in an evidence bag I'd say you'd be onto something.

Right but didn't the buildings fall because of the massive fires that the explosion caused?

 

[Tod]

I personally feel Dr. Wood is a disinfo agent.


NONE of her theories are repeatable by experiment.

Dr. Jones, Kevin Ryan, et al have ALL either lost their professional positions, or were forced to retire, and they all found actual evidence supporting their claims, and performed experiments backing them up.

Dr. Wood has done none of this, because her claims cannot be proven through experiment, you know, that whole science thing. Instead, she publishes a book full of pictures and references to food items.

Dr. Wood has never lost her professional position, and her theories are as whacked out as you can possible get, not to mention un provable. Why is that?

I have found several reference to Dr. Wood losing her position at Clemson after she studied the 9/11 situation. Maybe you have her and Dr. Jones mixed up?



I found the Wood presentation I watched to be very credible, in part because she looks at the evidence without making any claims as to what actually caused the collapses because she says she doesn't know. She suggests that the evidence points to the possibility of directed energy and shows how other explanations don't fit the evidence as well.

 

[coastie]

I have found several reference to Dr. Wood losing her position at Clemson after she studied the 9/11 situation. Maybe you have her and Dr. Jones mixed up?



I found the Wood presentation I watched to be very credible, in part because she looks at the evidence without making any claims as to what actually caused the collapses because she says she doesn't know. She suggests that the evidence points to the possibility of directed energy and shows how other explanations don't fit the evidence as well.

I don't have the two confused, but admit I'm hearing of her losing her position for the first time now...maybe I am thinking of someone else, but is most certainly not Dr. Jones.

Regardless, I have watched hours worth of her presentations, and was not convinced. I read her book, and was not impressed.

Her theories are not repeatable through experiment.

Others have proven their hypothesis through experiment.

 

[RickyJ]

I personally feel Dr. Wood is a disinfo agent.


NONE of her theories are repeatable by experiment.

Dr. Jones, Kevin Ryan, et al have ALL either lost their professional positions, or were forced to retire, and they all found actual evidence supporting their claims, and performed experiments backing them up.

Dr. Wood has done none of this, because her claims cannot be proven through experiment, you know, that whole science thing. Instead, she publishes a book full of pictures and references to food items.

Dr. Wood has never lost her professional position, and her theories are as whacked out as you can possible get, not to mention un provable. Why is that?

I agree with that. She is also kind of crazy, the perfect person to put forth as a "truther" to discredit the real truth of 9/11.

 

[ClydeCoulter]

I would hope that no one were to "follow" some other down some path blindly.

Truth comes from facing and examining facts.

I found Dr. Woods videos somewhat interesting. She has shown many phenomena that aren't easily explained that she has given names such as "dustification".

Whether her explanation of the possible "how" makes sense is another matter, but the how and why can't be explained with out further in depth research with access to all of the available data and evidence.

@RickyJ, do you disagree with much of her analysis of the available video and interviews from 9/11?