RP should stay away from this, but "kylejack" is 100% wrong and should not be repeating a false "debunking" story.
It is not the production of layers which was the issue, but the number and nature of them. It is impossibleto reproduce the 9-layer result with certain key elements in their own discrete layers via any process other than intentional alteration. I do have the skills to confirm this myself and did so with the original document released by the WH. You cannot produce a PDF scan of a legit BC document with the registrar's signature and date time and stamp each on its own separate, discrete, and movable layer. It cannot be done, and the embarrassingly poor excuse for a "debunking" (which actually confirms, not debunks, the fraud if you look at the document he produced).