Concord, NH, Cops Want Armored SWAT Vehicle to Combat "Free Staters" (And Others)

More coverage. This time from the Tea Party
http://www.nhteapartycoalition.org/...ief-john-duval-government-our-biggest-threat/
Police Chief John Duval, Government, our Biggest Threat
Posted by Admin in News, Other Articles, Videos on 07 30th, 2013

Are you more likely to be killed by a government official using excessive and unwarranted force, or a foreign terrorist such as the Mossad or Taliban?

We bet you thought it was a foreign terrorist, you know, the kind hoping to be rewarded with 72 virgins. But you were wrong. You are actually 8x more likely to be killed by an agent of our own government according to this disturbing study from the CATO Institute. CATO maintains a ‘Botched Military Raids’ map as proof. In addition, Amnesty International reports that there have been over 540 deaths from improper tasering, a dangerous method of shocking your victim now being used by police for practically no reason at all. [See our articles on Daniel Musso]
Are you beginning to rethink just who has become the biggest threat to our liberty and freedom, and even our lives?
How did this happen? Perhaps it is pressure from the federal government and their DHS agency, perhaps it is media malfeasance in describing certain groups, or perhaps it is just plain ignorance.
From this UL article, we learned that Concord Police Chief John Duval has made a request for a grant to be used to purchase a “Bearcat G3″, a type of armored vehicle, in order to fight terrorism in NH. He states in the application that ‘New Hampshire’s experience with terrorism “slants primarily towards the domestic type,” and said “the threat is real and here.”‘

We know of no incidents of “terrorism”, domestic or otherwise, that have occurred in NH. Further…
“Groups such as the Sovereign Citizens, Free Staters and Occupy New Hampshire are active and present daily challenges,” the application stated. In addition to organized groups, it cited “several homegrown clusters that are anti-government and pose problems for law enforcement agencies.”
Homegrown “clusters”? Daily challenges? Surely Duval is stretching this to create a sense of urgency that does not exist. Let’s take a look at the groups he cites as ‘terrorists’.
In the MIAC report, the FSP and OWS were not mentioned but people who consider themselves Sovereign Citizens were lumped in with Militia Members, Tax Resistors, pro-lifers, Anti-Immigration (illegal only of course) anti-Federal Reserve, anti-North American Union, anti-alphabet soup agencies, those against a Constitutional Convention, those who are anti-RFID chips, or who display the Molon Labe slogan or display the historical Gadsden Flag (or any other number of don’t tread on me flags) and listed as domestic terrorists. The teaparty is made up of all of those types also including Oathkeepers, Anarchists, (little to no government – does not mean violent) and strict Constitutionalists.
[Note: Since we know of no Christian or White Identity groups existing in NH, we did not include those. The teaparty in any case, does not tolerate racism of any kind, or any militant religionist types, and would not allow these types of groups to become members of this coalition.]
Is Duval taking his lead from DHS and their co-conspirators at the Southern Poverty Law Center? SPLC is a group that lists anyone who does not agree with their big government agenda as ‘hate groups’.
Duval’s inclusion of the FSP and OWS is laughable. FSP is a serious effort to get people to move to NH. Once they arrive, they are free to be active or not. The FSP doesn’t guide their actions. [Most FSPers are politically aware and many serve in the legislature. This writer came to NH for similar reasons in 1989, before the FSP was conceived.]
While OWS has proven to be a movement funded by the left and guilty of crimes and violence in other parts of the country, the small erstwhile contingent of about 50 OWSers in NH were not violent, although misguided into thinking OWS was a liberty movement of sorts. As far as we know, their worst crime was assembling on a city park without a permit…
None of the above mentioned groups would seem to warrant Duval’s claim of the imminent threat of domestic terrorism in NH.
Not only has the moderate Union Leader admitted that we are experiencing an unnecessary militarization of our local police, but this video is further proof that the problem has become so serious a threat to not only our freedoms but our very lives, that even the mainstream “milquetoast” republican propagandists on FOX are reporting it. Here Mike Huckabee interviews Attorney John Whitehead, author of “Government of Wolves”:

Innocents have been killed, beloved pets shot for no reason, and all because the law which says a warrant must be presented before a search was ignored. Sometimes, the use of such force is over ridiculous matters such as the suspected use of marijuana. [Note: we do not advocate breaking the law, but marijuana users are almost NEVER violent]
 
Americans for Legal Immigration stated, “Police were instructed to look for Americans who were concerned about unemployment, taxes, illegal immigration, gangs, border security, abortion, high costs of living, gun restrictions, FEMA, the IRS, The Federal Reserve, and the North American Union/SPP/North American Community. The ‘Missouri Documents’ also said potential domestic terrorists might like gun shows, short wave radios, combat movies, movies with white male heroes, Tom Clancy novels, and Presidential Candidates Ron Paul, Bob Barr, and Chuck Baldwin!”

The FBI’s Communities Against Terrorism program labels those who purchase food in bulk as possible terrorists, as well as those who use cash to purchase items and show interest in using the Internet in public places.

http://thenewamerican.com/usnews/co...labels-liberty-lovers-as-potential-terrorists

They're Everywhere,They're Everywhere!
 

BQZlnqQBGkKGrHgoH-CEEjlLl0F63BJ4uFJ.jpg
 
Tom Woods also covered this on his website. Lots of new signers for the FSP because of this. Thank you Concord government officials!

http://www.tomwoods.com/blog/police-because-of-free-staters-we-need-an-armored-vehicle/

Police: Because of ‘Free Staters,’ We Need an Armored Vehicle
The Free Staters in New Hampshire are among the express reasons given for why the Concord police department is applying to purchase an armored vehicle.

The Free Staters, who are nonviolent, are lumped into the category of “domestic terrorism.” For not wanting anyone to use violence.

The relevant portion of the application reads:

The State of New Hampshire’s experience with terrorism slants primarily towards the domestic type. We are fortunate that our State has not been victimized from a mass casualty event from an international terrorism strike however on the domestic front, the threat is real and here. Groups such as the Sovereign Citizens, Free Staters and Occupy New Hampshire are active and present daily challenges. Outside of officially organized groups, several homegrown clusters that are anti-government and pose problems for law enforcement agencies.

It goes on to say that they need this vehicle in order to resist bombs, or radiological devices (it has a radiation detector). (Thanks to Louis.)
 
FSP Demands Apology for "Domestic Terrorism" Claims
- See more at: http://freestateproject.org/blogs/fsp-demands-apology-domestic-terrorism-claims

For some reason the below text is a wall of text. Click on the link to see decent formatting.

The Concord NH Police Department has made false and misleading statements in the above cited grant application for $258,024 in federal funds from the Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”) to receive a Lenco Bearcat armored vehicle, hereinafter the “Tank.” The DHS grant application states: “The State of New Hampshire’s experience with terrorism slants primarily towards the domestic type. We are fortunate that our State has not been victimized from a mass casualty event from an international terrorism strike however on the domestic front, the threat is real and here. Groups such as the Sovereign Citizens, Free Staters and Occupy New Hampshire are active and present daily challenges. Outside of officially organized groups, several homegrown clusters that are anti-government and pose problems for law enforcement agencies.” As president of the Free State Project (“FSP”), a NH-based non-profit organization with the sole mission of attracting 20,000 pro-freedom people to the Granite State, I am alarmed and appalled at the cleverly worded insinuation that the FSP is a domestic terrorist threat, or that “Free Staters” are “active and present daily challenges” to the Concord Police Department. Individuals who sign up for the FSP generally subscribe to the non-aggression principle, an ethical stance which asserts that "aggression" is inherently illegitimate. "Aggression" is defined as the initiation of physical force against persons or property, the threat of such, or fraud upon persons or their property. Our website specifically states: "Anyone who promotes violence, racial hatred, or bigotry is not welcome." Sadly, the DHS grant application only came to light through an ACLU public records request, and not as a result of transparent governance. Launched earlier this year, the ACLU program, “The Militarization of Policing in America,” with the slogan “Towns Don’t Need Tanks,” aims to determine the extent to which local police departments are now using federally subsidized military technology and war-like tactics in their communities. From the ACLU’s March 6, 2013 press release: "’Equipping state and local law enforcement with military weapons and vehicles, military tactical training, and actual military assistance to conduct traditional law enforcement erodes civil liberties and encourages increasingly aggressive policing...’ said Kara Dansky, senior counsel for the ACLU's Center for Justice.” I concur. In the same way the tenor of policing changed when “peace officers” became “law enforcement officers,” no good can come from tanks in small, peaceful communities. In fact, the secrecy of the DHS grant application and the false and misleading allegations therein are prima facie examples of the erosion of civil liberties and aggressive policing referred to by the ACLU. The New Hampshire Constitution states: “All men are born equally free and independent; therefore, all government of right originates from the people, is founded in consent, and instituted for the general good.” To discriminate against “Free Staters” for their pro-liberty, pro-peace, small government ideological beliefs, and to defame an organization in the manner set forth in the DHS grant is unconscionable, and unconstitutional. On behalf of FSP participants, I hereby respectfully demand: A retraction and amendment of the grant application to remove all references to “Free Staters.” You are reminded that a condition of receipt of the grant’s funding is: “Funding may be suspended or terminated for filing a false certification in this application or other reports or document as part of this program.” An itemized list by calendar day of the “daily challenges” presented by “Free Staters” to the CPD. Please list individuals, not a class of people. A written letter of apology from both the City and CPD, which includes the following statements: “The Free State Project is not a domestic terrorist organization,” and “Free Staters do not pose ‘daily challenges’ to the Concord Police Department.” A copy of this letter will be posted on the Free State Project’s website, and distributed to our media contacts. Your immediate attention to this important matter is appreciated. Yours in peace and liberty, Carla Gericke President, Free State Project This letter was sent via email and USPS mail on August 2, 2013 to: Thomas Aspell (Concord City Manager), John Duval (Concord Police Chief), Brian LeBrun (Concord Deputy City Manager) with the reference: "False and Misleading Concord Bearcat DHS Grant Application CFDA #97.067" with cc to Devon Chaffee, Executive Director, NHCLU. - See more at: http://freestateproject.org/blogs/fsp-demands-apology-domestic-terrorism-claims#sthash.S6hrccZ3.dpuf
 
Last edited:
FSP Demands Apology for "Domestic Terrorism" Claims
- See more at: http://freestateproject.org/blogs/fsp-demands-apology-domestic-terrorism-claims

For some reason the below text is a wall of text. Click on the link to see decent formatting.

Allow me to assist:



FSP Demands Apology for "Domestic Terrorism" Claims

http://freestateproject.org/blogs/fsp-demands-apology-domestic-terrorism-claims

bearcat.jpg


The Concord NH Police Department has made false and misleading statements in the above cited grant application for $258,024 in federal funds from the Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”) to receive a Lenco Bearcat armored vehicle, hereinafter the “Tank.”

The DHS grant application states: “The State of New Hampshire’s experience with terrorism slants primarily towards the domestic type. We are fortunate that our State has not been victimized from a mass casualty event from an international terrorism strike however on the domestic front, the threat is real and here. Groups such as the Sovereign Citizens, Free Staters and Occupy New Hampshire are active and present daily challenges. Outside of officially organized groups, several homegrown clusters that are anti-government and pose problems for law enforcement agencies.”

As president of the Free State Project (“FSP”), a NH-based non-profit organization with the sole mission of attracting 20,000 pro-freedom people to the Granite State, I am alarmed and appalled at the cleverly worded insinuation that the FSP is a domestic terrorist threat, or that “Free Staters” are “active and present daily challenges” to the Concord Police Department.

Individuals who sign up for the FSP generally subscribe to the non-aggression principle, an ethical stance which asserts that "aggression" is inherently illegitimate. "Aggression" is defined as the initiation of physical force against persons or property, the threat of such, or fraud upon persons or their property. Our website specifically states: "Anyone who promotes violence, racial hatred, or bigotry is not welcome."

Sadly, the DHS grant application only came to light through an ACLU public records request, and not as a result of transparent governance. Launched earlier this year, the ACLU program, “The Militarization of Policing in America,” with the slogan “Towns Don’t Need Tanks,” aims to determine the extent to which local police departments are now using federally subsidized military technology and war-like tactics in their communities.

From the ACLU’s March 6, 2013 press release: "’Equipping state and local law enforcement with military weapons and vehicles, military tactical training, and actual military assistance to conduct traditional law enforcement erodes civil liberties and encourages increasingly aggressive policing...’ said Kara Dansky, senior counsel for the ACLU's Center for Justice.”

I concur. In the same way the tenor of policing changed when “peace officers” became “law enforcement officers,” no good can come from tanks in small, peaceful communities. In fact, the secrecy of the DHS grant application and the false and misleading allegations therein are prima facie examples of the erosion of civil liberties and aggressive policing referred to by the ACLU.

The New Hampshire Constitution states: “All men are born equally free and independent; therefore, all government of right originates from the people, is founded in consent, and instituted for the general good.” To discriminate against “Free Staters” for their pro-liberty, pro-peace, small government ideological beliefs, and to defame an organization in the manner set forth in the DHS grant is unconscionable, and unconstitutional.

On behalf of FSP participants, I hereby respectfully demand:

1 - A retraction and amendment of the grant application to remove all references to “Free Staters.” You are reminded that a condition of receipt of the grant’s funding is: “Funding may be suspended or terminated for filing a false certification in this application or other reports or document as part of this program.”

2 - An itemized list by calendar day of the “daily challenges” presented by “Free Staters” to the CPD. Please list individuals, not a class of people.

3 - A written letter of apology from both the City and CPD, which includes the following statements: “The Free State Project is not a domestic terrorist organization,” and “Free Staters do not pose ‘daily challenges’ to the Concord Police Department.”

A copy of this letter will be posted on the Free State Project’s website, and distributed to our media contacts. Your immediate attention to this important matter is appreciated.

Yours in peace and liberty,

Carla Gericke
President, Free State Project

This letter was sent via email and USPS mail on August 2, 2013 to: Thomas Aspell (Concord City Manager), John Duval (Concord Police Chief), Brian LeBrun (Concord Deputy City Manager) with the reference: "False and Misleading Concord Bearcat DHS Grant Application CFDA #97.067" with cc to Devon Chaffee, Executive Director, NHCLU.
 
Did I mention that I love Tom Woods? Don't judge, it is the 2010s;)

http://www.tomwoods.com/blog/fsp-demands-apology-for-domestic-terrorist-classification/
FSP Demands Apology for ‘Domestic Terrorist’ Classification
I noted here the other day that the Free State Project was expressly listed as one of the reasons the police department of Concord, New Hampshire, claimed it needed an armored vehicle. The Free State Project has struck back. President Carla Gericke writes:

On behalf of FSP participants, I hereby respectfully demand:

A retraction and amendment of the grant application to remove all references to “Free Staters.” You are reminded that a condition of receipt of the grant’s funding is: “Funding may be suspended or terminated for filing a false certification in this application or other reports or document as part of this program.”
An itemized list by calendar day of the “daily challenges” presented by “Free Staters” to the CPD. Please list individuals, not a class of people.
A written letter of apology from both the City and CPD, which includes the following statements: “The Free State Project is not a domestic terrorist organization,” and “Free Staters do not pose ‘daily challenges’ to the Concord Police Department.”
Read Carla’s whole letter.
http://freestateproject.org/blogs/fsp-demands-apology-domestic-terrorism-claims
 
To disregard "money-flow" is fatal mistake to make.

No, not going to disregard it completely.

Just always going to understand that power is primary motivation.

Money can be accumulated to the point of satiation, but power, on the other hand...
 
Maybe we're looking at this the wrong way. Consider:

If "SHTF Day" ever really does come, all this materiel will be that much more "available" (to those who are able to sieze all or part of a local PD's arsenal) than it otherwise would have been. Given that so many cops are wannabe-Rambos (and even those PD personnel who are ex-military are likely to have become soft & lazy after having gotten into the habits of (1) never being held to any kind of disciplined accountablility, and (2) never dealing with anything but compliant & submissive mundanes), determined and highly-motivated guerrillas might not have such a hard time as one might at first think if it came to "liberating" certain equipment for their own use. Such equipment would certainly be much more "accessible" from PD's than from actual military bases or installments.

Just a thought - for the sake of finding some kind of "silver lining" in all this crap ...

Bada Bing!: New Orleans police fire 51 for desertion
 
Back
Top