COLUMN: Ron Paul is dangerous

[arisenagain]

http://www.cm-life.com/2012/02/27/column-ron-paul-is-dangerous/

Another spin piece.

 

[CaptUSA]

...to the status quo.


Wow, this guy is really bending over backwards to misrepresent Paul's positions...

 

[CaptUSA]

On the plus side, the comments are delightful.

 

[GraniteHills]

This John Priest fellow is essentially advancing a claim that no one in America is more hostile to civil liberties than Ron Paul.

I'm going to go on a limb and guess he is a supporter of Barack Obama, whom as we all know is a fervent defender of civil liberties.

Can someone please grab my eyes for me? They rolled all the way up to my ceiling.

 

[DailySkew]

What a hack piece. Yet another so-called concerned American who is actually against The Constitution. I wonder if it was written by a 6th grader who was never learned this stuff. Nah, 6th graders are smarter than John Priest.

State governments would be more easy to change than the federal government if Paul was elected.

 

[jemuf]

I wonder how this article made it to Google News because it did tonight with several other negative headlines.

 

[Boss]

The whole article centers around Paul's position on the Federal Gov't vs State Gov't, yet when I control+F the page to search for the word "constitution" - it doesn't appear at all in the article.

However, the word "constitution" is mentioned in the first comment

 

[Austrian Econ Disciple]

Nationalists of either stripe are dangerous. Pox on them all! That dangerous and idiotic idea born of the mid 19th Century. Fuck Nationalism.

 

[nano1895]

...to the status quo.


Wow, this guy is really bending over backwards to misrepresent Paul's positions...

Of this country!