The monster has outgrown its bounds. There are no more bounds, but complete tyranny. Can we remember that it was Liberty and Free Markets that made this monster? Remember that. Think about it. In order to bring individual liberty and financial indepedence back, the liberty and independence of some must be handicapped. Ron Paul knows this. We should be careful not to simplify the characterisation of our group to the extent that it provides excuses to keep the plutocracy in command. This is why Ron is not Charles Koch, and why Rand is not Tom Cotton. So... what's the difference ? In that determination is the middle road where Paul Camp has much agreement with elements of the jaded, non-mainstream Left, and the Alt-Right.
Rand is still young, as far as Senators go. There are no indications he's going anywhere. I can't help but mention here, that one big reason Paulism, Tea Party, Freedom Coalition, etc, are not the same is Donald Trump. We've been SMOTHERED for 6 years. I feel it should not continue, and is not in our best interest. It was, however, in Rand's best interest to get warm with Trump, for obvious reasons, but I agree that our identity is at stake in a majorly disruptive way. Also, the lack of conservatives in Libertarianism makes Libertarianism mean something OTHER than what it meant for a majority, years ago. I've never been a Libertarian, or voted for one. If someone like Justin Amash won the nom, I'd probably vote for him. This lack of identity has been exploited by dishonest actors and unserious people, and it's driven many away from what could have been a stronger third party. For example, why should there EVEN BE a Constitution Party that was not satisfied with the Libertarian Party? Because Libertarianism means so many different things to different people. Like I said earlier in this -- Liberty for the .000001% cannot continue. Liberty for the amoral and distracted will not help anyone, including themselves.