CNN stares me down! (Peter Morris, Dana Bash)

DadaOrwell

Member
Joined
May 27, 2007
Messages
502
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f-a60PY5-3g

Senior photojournalist with apparent ties to the president...shows me his Glare of Doom after I film his reporter, Dana Bash. His name is Peter Morris, and our encounter occurred at Ron Paul's NH primary celebration on Jan. 10. If she'd let me interview her....we could have delved into my concerns regarding her treatment by Paul supporters. Instead...the focus becomes CNN's angry, powerful propaganda operative.
 
Dana Bash is appropriately named because she likes to bash people, especially Ron Paul.
 
"Bash is the daughter of Stu Schwartz, an ABC News producer who is currently the senior broadcast producer of ABC News, based at Good Morning America. Her mother, Frances Weinman Schwartz, is an author and educator in Jewish studies. Bash's brother, David Schwartz, is a New York City-based video producer.
On May 25, 2008, she married fellow CNN correspondent John King, who converted to Judaism prior to marrying her.[1] It is her second marriage, having previously been married to Jeremy Bash.[8][9]
She and King have a son, Jonah Frank King, born in June 2011."

She's against Ron Paul because she is yet just another Jewish extremist in the media.
 
"Bash is the daughter of Stu Schwartz, an ABC News producer who is currently the senior broadcast producer of ABC News, based at Good Morning America. Her mother, Frances Weinman Schwartz, is an author and educator in Jewish studies. Bash's brother, David Schwartz, is a New York City-based video producer.
On May 25, 2008, she married fellow CNN correspondent John King, who converted to Judaism prior to marrying her.[1] It is her second marriage, having previously been married to Jeremy Bash.[8][9]
She and King have a son, Jonah Frank King, born in June 2011."

She's against Ron Paul because she is yet just another Jewish extremist in the media.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agent_provocateur
 
mosquitobite, I suggest you read the forum guidelines on falsely calling people trolls or provocateurs. If you can't argue on facts then go to another forum. I suggest the
Gingrich campaign as you and Adelson seem to have a lot in common.
 
mosquitobite, I suggest you read the forum guidelines on falsely calling people trolls or provocateurs. If you can't argue on facts then go to another forum. I suggest the
Gingrich campaign as you and Adelson seem to have a lot in common.

you arent defending dana bash are you?
 
Really, there are people who don't think Dana Bash isn't a troll? I mean outside of people who are paid to say otherwise like her fellow CNN buddies?
 
I am all for exposing corporate media but that cameraman didnt do anything. And his face was more like face of a tired man. Someone who doesnt want to be there. His "defensive mode" was somewhat understandable reaction I guess.

I watch from time to tome RidleyReport but this one wasnt that good.
 
Look, I dislike Dana Bush as much as the next person. I think she's a paid hack who is not objective in the slightest.

But make no mistake guys - there are people in this government who will try to do everything in their power to destroy our movement. All they need is one good false flag to set it off. Remember our goal: electing Ron Paul. It's not about unveiling 'dem scary joos' around every corner. :rolleyes:
 
I am all for exposing corporate media but that cameraman didnt do anything. And his face was more like face of a tired man. Someone who doesnt want to be there. His "defensive mode" was somewhat understandable reaction I guess.

I watch from time to tome RidleyReport but this one wasnt that good.

Yeah, I agree.
 
I think irritating the enemy just because you can is a bad idea and probably won't get you the results that you desire, or at least, that are beneficial to the campaign.
 
Well, the cameraman was trying to position himself to block Ridley's shot, which is kind of tacky, but hey, it's a free country.
 
I think irritating the enemy just because you can is a bad idea and probably won't get you the results that you desire, or at least, that are beneficial to the campaign.
He wasn't being irritating, he's an independent journalist who was trying to ask a question. She said no, so he just took some video.
 
He wasn't being irritating, he's an independent journalist who was trying to ask a question. She said no, so he just took some video.
I've seen a handful of his videos where he just stands there and records people hoping to get a rise out of them. I fail to see how this is productive. If the only story you have is a person annoyed that you're recording them, you don't have much of a story.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top