CNN Paula Zahn segment on Ron Paul

[Scribbler de Stebbing]

CNN is certainly going to be much more fair to Ron Paul in the next debate than either of the two predecessors, though that's not saying much. I'm really looking foward to June 5.

 

[literatim]

CNN is certainly going to be much more fair to Ron Paul in the next debate than either of the two predecessors, though that's not saying much. I'm really looking foward to June 5.

I do not trust Wolf Blitzer. The only thing the upcoming debate has going for Ron Paul is the fact that it is New Hampshire.

 

[Captain Shays]

Ben the little boy mentioned the USS Cole attack, and other attacks. But what he fails to understand, or maybe refuses to mention is that those attacks were all post Gulf War and post declaration of Fatwa by bin Laden. He seems to have gotten himself into a self delusional trap by not understanding history properly. His own examples make the case for Ron Paul and this little boy is so mixed up that he doesn't even know it yet. See, if these guys are really forced into a discussion with people who know their stuff, and if they don't shout them down, they'll be proven so wrong. We NEED to get them to face the truth at all costs or its not only going to cost Ron Paul the election, but its' going to cost us all our lives and the lives of our loved ones.

 

[Kandilynn]

We definitely don't need to have a "Mike Wallace" moment such as when he asked Romney if he had premarital sex with his wife--talk about a stupid, irrelevant, privacy invading question!

I respectfully disagree. I believe that was a very pertinent question considering that Mitt Romney is an advocate of abstinence only education. If he's telling teenagers to abstain from sex rather than teaching proper sex education, then I as a voter, have a right to know if he's being hypocritical. Maybe that wasn't the reason that particular question was asked, I didn't watch the interview, but it is a valid question- at least in my opinion.