CNN explains Rand's "absence"

[RonPaulMall]

Why can't Rand simply, and calmly, posit the question of "Why did Donald Trump donate to Hillary Clinton?" And leave it at that.

Because it is a stupid argument that Trump has already addressed and it would cause Trump to attack Rand (something he has to this point generally avoided).

 

[anaconda]

Because it is a stupid argument that Trump has already addressed

Are you referring to the Hannity interview in April? How is it a "stupid" argument when his explanation is that he finds it acceptable to fund whomever is in office or likely to be in office? It's practical but not principled. A candidate's principles and credibility are potentially very important images for voters.

 

[anaconda]

Fashion faux pas - the tip of a tie is supposed to terminate at the belt line. Donald's is plunging way below. Notwithstanding the nascent push back against the entire concept of wearing ties.

http://www.ryot.org/still-wearing-ties/452153

 

[timosman]

Fashion faux pas - the tip of a tie is supposed to terminate at the belt line. Donald's is plunging way below. Notwithstanding the nascent push back against the entire concept of wearing ties.

Wrong glass, sir!

 

[erowe1]

Rand needs to attack Trump, and attack him HARD

Why?

 

[ClydeCoulter]

Rand needs to stay in the top 10 in polls. Right now, that's all that needs to be done in the media sphere. (other than not making stupid statements on policy and treaties)