Clueless WA GOP Chariman

Deoptics8

Member
Joined
Jan 4, 2008
Messages
13
Wow! Your GOP chairman is clueless. I just saw this which was posted this morning on WSRP site. Good luck Washington on the recount. I used to live in Auburn and would love to come back to help in the fight.


http://wsrp.org/News/Read.aspx?ID=7056

Dear Friends,

First of all, thank you to everyone who participated in our historic and exciting Republican precinct caucuses on Saturday, February 9th. The success of our caucuses was only possible because of the incredible efforts of thousands of grassroots Republican volunteers around the state.

This past week has been a remarkable time for our party. I had the great honor of speaking on the program for Mrs. Janet Huckabee during her rally in Kirkland on the day before the caucuses, and I appeared on the stage with Sen. John McCain during his rally in Seattle later that same evening. As a state party we are neutral in the presidential race, but we are supportive of all of our outstanding Republican candidates.

Recently, there has been some controversy surrounding the results of our precinct caucuses, and I want to correct some misimpressions that have been reported. Our role at the State Party Headquarters has been to gather data from our 39 county party organizations, tabulate the data and report the statewide results. We are merely the messengers for the information gathered by our outstanding Republican Party volunteers throughout the state.

It has been suggested that we intentionally “stopped" counting delegates on Saturday night before all the results were reported. Frankly, I was thrilled that we could provide the level of results that we did on the day of the caucuses. We provided our last updated numbers on Caucus Night at about 10:15 p.m., and explained to the media that we are a volunteer organization, and that our volunteers do need to get some sleep, and most of them want to be fresh and alert for Sunday church services. Nonetheless, some have spun the situation to suggest that we stopped counting because we had an intent to favor a particular candidate, which is baseless and untrue.

Our staff was actually in the office working on Sunday so we could get more numbers, and we are continuing to stay in touch with our grassroots Republican Party organizations around the state to obtain as many of the delegate results as we can as quickly as possible. We will continue in these efforts until the job is completed.

It was my decision as State Party Chairman to announce on Saturday night that Sen. McCain was the "winner" of the precinct caucuses. It's important for everyone to know that I would have delivered the same message on Gov. Huckabee's behalf (or Congressman Paul or Gov. Romney) if the situation had been reversed. The margin between Sen. McCain and Gov. Huckabee is not huge, but after running an analysis of remaining precincts and consulting with my staff, I was confident the margin would hold, and I thought I owed it to all of those who took the time to attend our precinct caucuses to provide them with that information.

My statement in no way “disenfranchised” anyone. We have continued our delegate count each day since the caucuses, and will continue until each delegate is counted. All the major campaigns have been treated fairly in this process. In fact, we provided representatives of the Huckabee and McCain Campaigns an opportunity to review the newest data before it is revealed to the media and posted on our website.

Some have suggested that it is inappropriate to refer to a candidate who received less than 50% of the delegates as the “winner”, though I followed the lead of states such as Iowa where Gov. Huckabee was named the “winner” of the Iowa caucuses with 34% of the vote, and North Dakota where Gov. Romney was named the “winner” after receiving 36%.

Working hand-in-hand with our county party organizations, we have provided the most accurate and timely information available. The latest review of data on Monday indicated that reporting issues existed in four of our 39 counties: Benton, Grant, Jefferson and Snohomish. In those four counties the data that we initially reported was a tabulation of the presidential preferences of caucus attendees, while in every other county the tabulation was made of the presidential preferences of the delegates chosen at Saturday’s caucuses. The corrected data for all four of these counties has been provided in the results issued on Monday night, February 11th. The number of total delegates for each candidate did change, but the overall ranking of the candidates has not changed.

It is important for all participants to understand that our precinct caucuses are the first step in a three-step process that allocates roughly half of our state’s delegates to the Republican National Convention. Delegates elected at the precinct caucuses will gather at county conventions, where delegates will be chosen for our State Republican Convention. At the state convention the actual delegates who will attend the Republican National Convention will be chosen. It will not be possible to ascertain the national delegate breakdown among the candidates until the state convention is held. But the precinct caucuses are an important show of strength, which is why each of the candidates campaigned so vigorously here in Washington State.

I hope this information is helpful. I look forward to working with every Republican across the state to achieve great victories in 2008. We will focus on electing Dino Rossi as Governor, re-electing our incumbent Republicans, winning new Republican seats and carrying our state for our eventual Republican presidential nominee.

But before then, please remember to vote in the Tuesday, February 19th Republican presidential primary. This is an entirely separate vote from our precinct caucus process. We will use the presidential primary to allocate roughly half of our state’s delegates to the Republican National Convention, while the Democrats in our state have chosen to disregard the votes cast in the presidential primary. Thank your continuing support of the Republican Party and of our outstanding candidates for public office.

Sincerely,



Chairman Luke Esser

Washington State Republican Party
 
I am so glad that the Huckster is putting a spotlight on the shady process there. It benefits our campaign as well!
 
Not too bright. Anyone reading this board knows that there was no "winner."

This guy wrote a sports column in the UW Daily when i went there - he titled it the "The (L)Esser Side of Sports" or something like that. We all called it the "Lesser side of sports writing."

BTW, he will be at our district meeting on 3/1 (he is a PCO, and i'm just guessing that he is a McWar supporter)
 
As mentioned in other thread, if we can do it, pass a resolution in next convention expressing a vote of no confidence in Mr. Esser.

In order for this resolution to succeed, it should make clear that the vote of no confidence is over the fact that he declared McWar a winner at 87% reporting, not because he stopped counting which was somewhat legitimate, as he has went on record at local news that this was a volunteer effort and they were burning oil at midnight counting, so there wasn't any way he could in good conscience force complete count the same day or next day.
 
So are these counts official delegate counts or, as other claims on here, presidential preference polls? I've not had a clear answer
If it is delegates, then we lost, unless we really have that many in undecided.
If it is preference polls, then why do we care?
 
Let me make this clear:

We, according to the state coordinator, won majority of the delegates. That much is sure.


The confusion is over whether they counted the preference polls (from the sign-in sheet) and whether they should be counting the delegates' preferences. Not to mention that they didn't complete the counting, declaring McAmnesty winner too early.
 
Luke Essor Blog.

From: http://libertarianthinktank.org/2008/02/12/washington-state-gop-debacle-you-dont-know-the-half/

The Washington State GOP stopped counting caucus results after only 87% of the counties reported in, just as John McCain edged past Mike Huckabee. Bradblog reports that this decision was made unilaterally by Washington State GOP chairman Luke Esser, or as Brad of Bradblog.com calls him, “Esser the Suppressor”. Brad also claimed that Luke Esser has a history of devising measures to suppress votes. He cites a UW Daily article written by Esser in 1986:

Luke “The Supressor” Esser

Now your average leftist loudmouth is a committed individual and can almost never be persuaded to ignore his constitutional rights. The deadbeats, however, are a different matter entirely. Years of interminable welfare checks and free government services have made these modern-day sloths even more lazy. They will vote on election day, if it isn’t much of a bother. But even the slightest inconvenience can keep them from the polling place.

That’s nothing. When I signed up to be a Precinct Committee Officer for my precinct in Seattle, I received a barrage of strange calls. Two of them came from the GOP district chair. In the first call, he asked how committed I was to the Republican Party. I truthfully said that I grew up in a Reagan household, served in the military, supported Rossi for Governor in 2004, and have voted only for Republican presidential nominees.

This loosened him up enough to talk some smack about Ron Paul. He said the problem with Paul is that he makes great, impassioned speeches in Congress, but refuses to “get anyone to go along with his ideas”. Whatever. “By the way”, he asked, “are you supporting anyone?” I said that I liked the whole field but I want to keep my preferences to myself. He said that was no problem.

After his first call, I got a call from another district chair. She outright asked me if I was a Paul supporter. I said the same thing. She shilled for Huckabee’s morality for some minutes before I told her that I was more interested in economic issues. “Yeah, but you don’t support gay marriage and those things do you?” I explained that, really, I don’t care.

She talked a little about being a PCO. She told me that I would run the precinct’s caucus, but “if a bunch of Paul supporters show up, you could loose the vote” I couldn’t understand what that meant. Anything but Paul is a win? Fortunately, my district chair called back to explain.

He said that he was encouraged by all of the new PCO applications, but that he would have to deny any applications from people who weren’t forthright about being Ron Paul supporters. He said that he had found us on a Ron Paul meetup group and that our PCO applications were denied. He didn’t say whether he did this with other candidates’ supporters.

I reminded him that I never lied to him. He acted like that mattered, “Oh. I didn’t really think about that. Most people just lied to me, but I guess you didn’t”. He promised to think about it and get back to me the next day. He did not. Nor did he return the email that I sent the following week. Rather than take a dangerous chance on a homeowner/law student/father of two, like me, our precinct went without a PCO.

So what the heck is going on that the Washington GOP’s representatives distinguish between Paul and a Republican win? A couple of months ago a Washington GOP official was quoted in a fury stating that he did not want a big turnout of Paul supporters because Paul is not even a real Republican (I think it was the Everett Herald, but I couldn’t find the article again after a 2 hour search) Apparently, strict Constitutionalists are personae non gratae around these ‘real’ Republicans.

So there you have it. If the Party stopped the vote after only 87%, my instinct tells me it’s not Huckabee that they’re worried about. Paul came in right behind those two with 21% of the vote, plus the vote stopped in Everett. But I suppose that invoking wrongdoing against Paul makes it a conspiracy theory.

Those “uncommitted” delegates might go for Paul too, considering that a large chunk of Paul supporters ran as incognito delegates, for precisely these reasons. This isn’t much of a secret, so this may be someone’s attempt to mitigate that effect. After all, Esser denied trying to get over on Huckabee, “I would have done the same for Gov. Huckabee if he had the same margin and the same underlying dynamics as Sen. McCain.” I believe that. Would he do it for Paul?

Incidentally, that district chair is a delegate for McCain now. He ran the caucus, so I approached him to make nice afterward. I told him it was a good thing that so many young voters were interested in politics. I also told him I became a delegate for Paul. Flustered, he said that we have only one candidate who can beat the Democrats and that we should be united.

Of course, I disagree. First, predicting McCain’s viability before he runs a national campaign is like calling Giuliani a front-runner before he looses to Ron Paul in the primaries. More importantly, I think that we will have the most statist, authoritarian Republican nominee since Nixon. I think we should send him a message to remind him where he came from.
 
If this is true, then all more the fuel to push forward the vote of no confidence.

Of course, we would do well to have some concrete evidence.
 
The SuprEsser is a McWar supporter. The vote of "no confidence," in my opinion, should center around publicly "declaring a winner," when we all know that there was absolutely nothing to "declare."
 
Clueless WA GOP Chariman

Oh, he's anything but clueless.

I hope that the relative silence about this OUTRAGE means that you guys in WA are working stealthily to do something about this.
 
The more I see that Esser is silent on the delegate count vs. Presidential Preference per the media's wishes, the more I think this is going to be just like Louisiana where the rules will change to favor the national platform. Esser will scrap the current rules by Feb. 19th to ensure the RP delegate will not see the light of day. Please don't let the Evergreen State fall to Esser! Please make sure RP supporters and delegate are out in force next week and all the way to the state convention in April!!!
 
The more I see that Esser is silent on the delegate count vs. Presidential Preference per the media's wishes, the more I think this is going to be just like Louisiana where the rules will change to favor the national platform. Esser will scrap the current rules by Feb. 19th to ensure the RP delegate will not see the light of day. Please don't let the Evergreen State fall to Esser! Please make sure RP supporters and delegate are out in force next week and all the way to the state convention in April!!!


HUH?.. i am a precinct delegate for Ron Paul. I will be at my county convention regardless.
 
His omission on the delegate counts and details really concerns me. His recent letter from this morning showing how proud he is on his progress, shows me he is incompetent or is hiding a lot. I am hopeful to see a show of force in the county and state conventions.
 
i posted this elsewhere, but he (Esser) is a delegate and will be at my district caucus meeting on March 1st. The preliminary numbers for our district that i have for delegates and what direction they are leaning shows McCain in very good shape (>50% w/us only holding about 20% of the delegates). this is Bellevue and Redmond (pretty sure Bill Gates lives in our district - he and Steve Ballmer donate from here). Bush and Cheyney spend the night in our district when they come through town.

looks like we're not in a position to pass any resolutions.
 
His omission on the delegate counts and details really concerns me. His recent letter from this morning showing how proud he is on his progress, shows me he is incompetent or is hiding a lot. I am hopeful to see a show of force in the county and state conventions.

I think that we can eliminate incompetent.

How can we force a county-by-county count of votes and delegates?

Have a look at this:

http://politicalinquirer.com/2008/02/12/washington-state-gop-vote-fraud/#comment-6642
 
Well I don't think he is clueless but it looks like some areas counted actual delegates and other counted preference sheets. But there are a lot of "uncommitted" people and it sounds like a number of them were Paul supporters. We shall see after county conventions are held.
 
Back
Top