Clinton's email: Destroy Syria For Israel

Contumacious

Member
Joined
Sep 29, 2008
Messages
2,794
C05794498-1.jpg


email


.
 

It is also a sobering thought to consider that the “refugee” crisis which currently threatens to destroy Europe, was directly sparked off by this US government action as well, insofar as there are any genuine refugees fleeing the civil war in Syria.
 
It is also a sobering thought to consider that the “refugee” crisis which currently threatens to destroy Europe, was directly sparked off by this US government action as well, insofar as there are any genuine refugees fleeing the civil war in Syria.

Hillary Clinton Email Archive

On March 16, 2016 WikiLeaks launched a searchable archive for 30,322 emails & email attachments sent to and from Hillary Clinton's private email server while she was Secretary of State. The 50,547 pages of documents span from 30 June 2010 to 12 August 2014. 7,570 of the documents were sent by Hillary Clinton. The emails were made available in the form of thousands of PDFs by the US State Department as a result of a Freedom of Information Act request. The final PDFs were made available on February 29, 2016.
 
Israel AKA 'Nation of Rothschild'.

Who wants another Rothschild Zionist for POTUS? :p :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
Hillary - Regime change in Syria . . . "would ease Israel's understandable fear of losing it's nuclear monopoly."
 
This is damning proof of what Hillary and all other establishment candidates represent; Not America's interests. And yet, all I hear from the usual suspects on this forum is:

**crickets**
 
This is not good for her chances in 2016.

Hillary Clinton: US State Department halts review of emails at FBI request

Since DGP's masters owners have endorsed Hillary, why would/should Email servers/Benghazi/ISIS investigations continue?

Hillary Clinton Wears Hijab In Latest Campaign Ad…



Screen-Shot-2015-10-21-at-8.34.23-AM.png


Bernie Sanders Calls Hillary Clinton $350K George Clooney Fundraiser ‘Obscene’
http://www.inquisitr.com/2933855/ber...aiser-obscene/


Tuesday, Jan 12, 2016 10:15 AM EDT
Emails expose close ties between Hillary Clinton and accused war criminal Henry Kissinger

Kissinger met regularly with Secretary Clinton, and applauded her hawkish foreign policy in a handwritten message



http://www.salon.com/2016/01/12/emai...nry_kissinger/
 
This is not good for her chances in 2016.

Hillary Clinton: US State Department halts review of emails at FBI request

Since DGP's masters owners have endorsed Hillary, why would/should Email servers/Benghazi/ISIS investigations continue?

Hillary Clinton Wears Hijab In Latest Campaign Ad…



Screen-Shot-2015-10-21-at-8.34.23-AM.png


Bernie Sanders Calls Hillary Clinton $350K George Clooney Fundraiser ‘Obscene’
http://www.inquisitr.com/2933855/ber...aiser-obscene/


Tuesday, Jan 12, 2016 10:15 AM EDT
Emails expose close ties between Hillary Clinton and accused war criminal Henry Kissinger

Kissinger met regularly with Secretary Clinton, and applauded her hawkish foreign policy in a handwritten message



http://www.salon.com/2016/01/12/emai...nry_kissinger/

The Queen of Chaos and the Threat of World War III

If you think U.S. policy couldn’t be more pro-Israel than it is now, just wait until you see Hillary in the White House. After Haim Saban pledged to spend “as much as necessary” to make her President, Hillary Clinton has pledged to invite Netanyahu to the While House in her first month as President, to use the occasion to “reaffirm the unbreakable bonds of friendship and unity” between America and Israel, and to do everything to destroy the Boycott-Divestment-Sanctions (BDS) movement. She continues to echo Israeli denunciations of Iran as a dangerous “terrorist state”. She has previously equated criticism of Israeli policies with “anti-Semitism” and blamed the people of Gaza for Israeli assaults on their wretched territory
 
Hillary - Regime change in Syria . . . "would ease Israel's understandable fear of losing it's nuclear monopoly."


Iran’s nuclear program and Syria’s civil war may seem unconnected, but in fact they are inextricably linked. Israel’s real fear — losing its nuclear monopoly and therefore the ability to use its conventional forces at will throughout the Middle East — is the unacknowledged factor driving its decision-making toward the Islamic Republic. For Israeli leaders, the real threat from a nuclear-armed Iran is not the prospect of an insane Iranian leader launching an unprovoked nuclear attack on Israel that would lead to the annihilation of both countries. It’s the fact that Iran doesn’t even need to test a nuclear weapon to undermine Israeli military leverage in Lebanon and Syria. Just reaching the nuclear threshold could embolden Iranian leaders to call on their proxy in Lebanon, Hezbollah, to attack Israel, knowing that their adversary would have to think hard before striking back.

That is where Syria comes in. It is the strategic relationship between the Islamic Republic and the Assad regime that makes it possible for Iran to undermine Israel’s security.


Guess who?

http://foreignpolicy.com/2012/06/04/the-real-reason-to-intervene-in-syria/
 
This is damning proof of what Hillary and all other establishment candidates represent; Not America's interests. And yet, all I hear from the usual suspects on this forum is:

**crickets**

Yeah but at least there's a Trump opposition research thread ;)


Ran across this great little video on the hag:

 
This is damning proof of what Hillary and all other establishment candidates represent; Not America's interests. And yet, all I hear from the usual suspects on this forum is:

**crickets**

Dude, I think you don't hear much is because we all agree on Hitlery. No arguments on this one. ;)
 
Yeah but at least there's a Trump opposition research thread ;)


Ran across this great little video on the hag:



This video content deserves a separate thread, I can do that later.

Dude, I think you don't hear much is because we all agree on Hitlery. No arguments on this one. ;)

BTW, are there any major differences between SWCs Hillary and Obama or they are pretty much same in your view?
 
This video content deserves a separate thread, I can do that later.



BTW, are there any major differences between SWCs Hillary and Obama or they are pretty much same in your view?

I think Obama is better. My POV is that he has followed W's designs but he is a bit softer. He's a puppet but sometimes he won't deliver the more extreme stuff TPTB want from him. I think the Iranian deal is an example. JMHPOV
 
Back
Top