Clinton Foundation - Pedophile Sex Ring

[Ender]

Serious mods take serious forum sliding trolls seriously.

And, that's it.

I will not contribute one more iota of content to this forum until CPUd is permabanned.

My time is more precious, and better spent not fighting CTR trolls.

Lover of Liberty? Free speech?

Don't even go there.

You don't like CPUd? Put 'em on ignore.

I know, I know, so very hard- much easier to call names when you don't agree with someone.

 

[pcosmar]

Anonymous lost my support after they didn't release any major dump data on the major banks what a shame.

What Data?

WHO HAD IT?

so an anonymous someone said something you believed.
and it didn't work out as you imagined.

anons don't need your "support"

 

[pcosmar]

How are those investigations by the FBI and NYPD going?

Impeded likely.

 

[KEEF]

Flight attendant used secret note to save teen from human trafficking

POSTED 6:33 PM, FEBRUARY 6, 2017, BY TRIBUNE MEDIA WIRE



Flight Attendants Learn To Spot Victims Of Sex Tr

[/COLOR]

SEATTLE — An Alaska Airlines flight attendant’s instincts and quick thinking helped save a teenage girl from human trafficking in 2011, according to WTSP.​

​

Flight attendant Shelia Frederick, 49, first thought something was off during a flight from Seattle to San Francisco when she noticed a teenage girl with greasy blond hair. The teen “looked like she had been through pure hell,” Frederick said.
The girl, who she thought was about 14 years old, was traveling with an older, well-dressed man.
Feeling uneasy about the situation, the 10-year flight veteran approached the duo and tried to strike up a conversation. When she did, the man became defensive.
That’s when Frederick told the girl under her breath to go to the bathroom, according to WTSP, where she had posted a note to the mirror.
“She wrote back on the note that she needed help,” Frederick told WTSP.
Frederick then notified the pilot and police were waiting in the terminal when they landed.

The story is just one of many being highlighted by Airline Ambassadors International, an organization focused on training attendants to spot signs of human trafficking, NBC News reports.
“The front line employees are not being trained,” said Nancy Rivard, president of the organization. “We’re funding this from our own pocketbooks.”
Rivard and several of her team flew to Houston before the Super Bowl to hold a two-day training session for airline employees on how to recognize human trafficking.


[/COLOR]
Human trafficking jumped 35.7 percent in the United States in 2016, according to a new report from the National Human Trafficking Hotline.

 

[UWDude]

Do tell....what else has been spotted?

there is another PIZZA sign, behind an iron GATE, at 0:04

 

[PatriotOne]

there is another PIZZA sign, behind an iron GATE, at 0:04

Okay..I see the pizza behind the screen door but since it is a pizza store he's coming out of not sure what that adds. Are you seeing something else on the sign behind the door I can't see? I can only make out the pizza on the sign behind the door..the rest is blurry to me. Does it say Comet Ping Pong or something? lol

I understand that the ad surely isn't coincidental though.

 

[AngryCanadian]

What Data?

WHO HAD IT?

so an anonymous someone said something you believed.
and it didn't work out as you imagined.

anons don't need your "support"

https://betanews.com/2016/05/12/anonymous-op-icarus/

 

[pcosmar]

https://betanews.com/2016/05/12/anonymous-op-icarus/

Bullshit reporting based on a misconception.

Anonymous is not an entity.. It is not an organization. it has no head nor tail.

It is anyone and no one.
Anyone can be anonymous.. and say anything as such.

 

[Athan]

Lover of Liberty? Free speech?

Don't even go there.

You don't like CPUd? Put 'em on ignore.

I know, I know, so very hard- much easier to call names when you don't agree with someone.

Ender, do you even understand what a shill is? They aren't here to provide a different point of view because their politics are different than ours. They are here to actively undermine and cause friction and infighting in a community. Their goal is to get members at each others throats. To purposely disseminate bad information. Think of it this way.

The people that want to disrupt us aren't just some random democrats with a different point of view, they are paid to do this by politically powerful organizations so they get naive users like you, against people calling them out for subversion like staerker. If a community's mods aren't on top of these shills, the community will be successfully disbanded.

 

[undergroundrr]

If a community's mods aren't on top of these shills, the community will be successfully disbanded.

Lucidly put. Let's start with the trump shills.

 

[Ender]

Ender, do you even understand what a shill is? They aren't here to provide a different point of view because their politics are different than ours. They are here to actively undermine and cause friction and infighting in a community. Their goal is to get members at each others throats. To purposely disseminate bad information. Think of it this way.

The people that want to disrupt us aren't just some random democrats with a different point of view, they are paid to do this by politically powerful organizations so they get naive users like you, against people calling them out for subversion like staerker. If a community's mods aren't on top of these shills, the community will be successfully disbanded.

I understand exactly what a shill is and it ain't CPUd.

Because someone offers a different perspective or does not approve of your candidate, does NOT make them a shill.

Those who chase others around, call names, and deliver continuous insults are the shills in my perspective.

 

[Athan]

I understand exactly what a shill is and it ain't CPUd.

Because someone offers a different perspective or does not approve of your candidate, does NOT make them a shill.

Those who chase others around, call names, and deliver continuous insults are the shills in my perspective.

Well yes and no. I personally haven't paid much attention to CPUd so can't offer whether I believe him to be a shill. I can offer that Zippyjuan does seem to be more than some dissenting view from what I have seen and is putting more than a political point of view and different bent. But if the community is sensing trolling, disruption, divisive content, you can't call them shills. Multiple users are calling it as they see it. This isn't a community where we can easily see the members like they were co-workers. You are going to have to keep defending him since you have made a different call; and they are entitled to continue to call out the suspicion of being a shill. Remember, whatever you think of CPUd, they earned his reputation of suspicion from others. There is no one else to blame for his predicament.

And frankly, that's a good lesson. If you are going to have a different point of view, you best provide intelligent, thought provoking respectful responses in a forum such as this. It would be like me going to a forum dedicated to discussing geology, causing a ruckus, and saying the earth is flat.

 

[Athan]

Serious mods take serious forum sliding trolls seriously.

And, that's it.

I will not contribute one more iota of content to this forum until CPUd is permabanned.

My time is more precious, and better spent not fighting CTR trolls.

Oh and as for you, don't be a ghey fahget staeker. Keep posting like normal. Shills hate that.

 

[CPUd]

Well yes and no. I personally haven't paid much attention to CPUd so can't offer whether I believe him to be a shill. I can offer that Zippyjuan does seem to be more than some dissenting view from what I have seen and is putting more than a political point of view and different bent. But if the community is sensing trolling, disruption, divisive content, you can't call them shills. Multiple users are calling it as they see it. This isn't a community where we can easily see the members like they were co-workers. You are going to have to keep defending him since you have made a different call; and they are entitled to continue to call out the suspicion of being a shill. Remember, whatever you think of CPUd, they earned his reputation of suspicion from others. There is no one else to blame for his predicament.

And frankly, that's a good lesson. If you are going to have a different point of view, you best provide intelligent, thought provoking respectful responses in a forum such as this. It would be like me going to a forum dedicated to discussing geology, causing a ruckus, and saying the earth is flat.

I simply recommended a more appropriate subforum for this thread, then out of nowhere, the dude started launching personal attacks and self-banned.

 

[Ender]

Well yes and no. I personally haven't paid much attention to CPUd so can't offer whether I believe him to be a shill. I can offer that Zippyjuan does seem to be more than some dissenting view from what I have seen and is putting more than a political point of view and different bent. But if the community is sensing trolling, disruption, divisive content, you can't call them shills. Multiple users are calling it as they see it. This isn't a community where we can easily see the members like they were co-workers. You are going to have to keep defending him since you have made a different call; and they are entitled to continue to call out the suspicion of being a shill. Remember, whatever you think of CPUd, they earned his reputation of suspicion from others. There is no one else to blame for his predicament.

And frankly, that's a good lesson. If you are going to have a different point of view, you best provide intelligent, thought provoking respectful responses in a forum such as this. It would be like me going to a forum dedicated to discussing geology, causing a ruckus, and saying the earth is flat.

And- if someone on the forum disagrees with you, you best provide intelligent, thought provoking respectful responses in a forum such as this, as well.
[MENTION=42199]CPUd[/MENTION] was called a shill the moment he began to post any derogatory info on Trump. Trump supporters instantly hated him. I have seen the same kind of thing with [MENTION=17293]Zippyjuan[/MENTION], when he posts something contrary to what someone else thinks.

Personally, I believe it's good to look at different POVs to try and ascertain the truth. AND, I have never seen either Zip or CPUd call someone a name or insult them.

If you don't like someone, put 'em on IGNORE, but the name-calling and insults are pretty tiresome.as well as childish and ridiculous.

 

[devil21]

What's this stuff about the Sessions' appointment being held up because of pending arrests?

Wouldn't that be fun?

 

[PatriotOne]

What's this stuff about the Sessions' appointment being held up because of pending arrests?

Wouldn't that be fun?

Now that Sessions was confirmed yesterday I pray the harvesting of human, drug, weapons, organ traffickers begin asap.

 

[Athan]

I simply recommended a more appropriate subforum for this thread, then out of nowhere, the dude started launching personal attacks and self-banned.

I wasn't born yesterday. I'm pretty sure the backlash you are getting in general is for more than the post you mentioned. And the allegations of Pizzagate involves several officials in government on both democratic and republican side that people simply want investigated thoroughly and PROPERLY by the FBI rather than us who can only speculate and speculate possibly inaccurately without the ability to collect physical evidence with search with warrants. It has every right to be where it us was initially posted. And I'm not being hostile when I say this: Asking to have it moved to a less viewed area is noted by me and should be noted by other honest members.

And- if someone on the forum disagrees with you, you best provide intelligent, thought provoking respectful responses in a forum such as this, as well.
[MENTION=42199]CPUd[/MENTION] was called a shill the moment he began to post any derogatory info on Trump. Trump supporters instantly hated him. I have seen the same kind of thing with [MENTION=17293]Zippyjuan[/MENTION], when he posts something contrary to what someone else thinks.

Personally, I believe it's good to look at different POVs to try and ascertain the truth. AND, I have never seen either Zip or CPUd call someone a name or insult them.

If you don't like someone, put 'em on IGNORE, but the name-calling and insults are pretty tiresome.as well as childish and ridiculous.

I can't really put my two cents worth on CPUd. Zippy is another story Ender. The poster was actually shilling for dismissing any suspicion that arose from the Podesta email's contents. Keep in mind, Alefantis is not a political figure running for office. There is a case to make to not make a witch hunt and let authorities figure it out. On principle one can say "we live in a country where you are innocent until proven guilty" and users could have continued the investigation without saying he was guilty. AND even if that happened, there is nothing wrong with people making an allegation based on actual suspicious clues and coincidences when portions of the US government is suspected of covering up the behavior. This forum does not exist to promote corruption or give it room to breathe because we are tolerant of government corruption. You are in the wrong place if you think that.

What Zippy was doing is making up any excuses and see if they stuck like a pleb; or as if the discussion hit too close to home, or perhaps demonized his own behavior. There was a massive push to shut down anything related to certain pizzagate discussion by CTR across internet forums or people asking questions on it. Obvious references using symbolisms were dismissed outright like they had no merit. That isn't "another point of view", that is straight up out of the CTR playbook. Zippy may indeed be a shill, and you may need to stop covering for him because you "so wish to hear another point of view".

Do you really think everyone here criticizing can't hear another point of view or at least recognize when a user is providing a different point of view?

 

[PatriotOne]

Boom! Drops microphone. Lots of people are going to need an adult diaper change. Clintons first.

February 09, 2017
Presidential Executive Order on Enforcing Federal Law with Respect to Transnational Criminal Organizations and Preventing International Trafficking

EXECUTIVE ORDER

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered as follows:

Section 1. Purpose. Transnational criminal organizations and subsidiary organizations, including transnational drug cartels, have spread throughout the Nation, threatening the safety of the United States and its citizens. These organizations derive revenue through widespread illegal conduct, including acts of violence and abuse that exhibit a wanton disregard for human life. They, for example, have been known to commit brutal murders, rapes, and other barbaric acts.
These groups are drivers of crime, corruption, violence, and misery. In particular, the trafficking by cartels of controlled substances has triggered a resurgence in deadly drug abuse and a corresponding rise in violent crime related to drugs. Likewise, the trafficking and smuggling of human beings by transnational criminal groups risks creating a humanitarian crisis. These crimes, along with many others, are enriching and empowering these organizations to the detriment of the American people.
A comprehensive and decisive approach is required to dismantle these organized crime syndicates and restore safety for the American people.
Sec. 2. Policy. It shall be the policy of the executive branch to:
(a) strengthen enforcement of Federal law in order to thwart transnational criminal organizations and subsidiary organizations, including criminal gangs, cartels, racketeering organizations, and other groups engaged in illicit activities that present a threat to public safety and national security and that are related to, for example:
(i) the illegal smuggling and trafficking of humans, drugs or other substances, wildlife, and weapons;
(ii) corruption, cybercrime, fraud, financial crimes, and intellectual-property theft; or
(iii) ** the illegal concealment or transfer of proceeds derived from such illicit activities.**
(b) ensure that Federal law enforcement agencies give a high priority and devote sufficient resources to efforts to identify, interdict, disrupt, and dismantle transnational criminal organizations and subsidiary organizations, including through the investigation, apprehension, and prosecution of members of such organizations, the extradition of members of such organizations to face justice in the United States and, where appropriate and to the extent permitted by law, the swift removal from the United States of foreign nationals who are members of such organizations;
(c) maximize the extent to which all Federal agencies share information and coordinate with Federal law enforcement agencies, as permitted by law, in order to identify, interdict, and dismantle transnational criminal organizations and subsidiary organizations;
(d) enhance cooperation with foreign counterparts against transnational criminal organizations and subsidiary organizations, including, where appropriate and permitted by law, through sharing of intelligence and law enforcement information and through increased security sector assistance to foreign partners by the Attorney General and the Secretary of Homeland Security;
(e) develop strategies, under the guidance of the Secretary of State, the Attorney General, and the Secretary of Homeland Security, to maximize coordination among agencies -- such as through the Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Forces (OCDETF), Special Operations Division, the OCDETF Fusion Center, and the International Organized Crime Intelligence and Operations Center -- to counter the crimes described in subsection (a) of this section, consistent with applicable Federal law; and
(f) pursue and support additional efforts to prevent the operational success of transnational criminal organizations and subsidiary organizations within and beyond the United States, to include prosecution of ancillary criminal offenses, such as immigration fraud and visa fraud, and the seizure of the implements of such organizations and forfeiture of the proceeds of their criminal activity.
Sec. 3. Implementation. In furtherance of the policy set forth in section 2 of this order, the Secretary of State, the Attorney General, the Secretary of Homeland Security, and the Director of National Intelligence, or their designees, shall co chair and direct the existing interagency Threat Mitigation Working Group (TMWG), which shall:
(a) work to support and improve the coordination of Federal agencies' efforts to identify, interdict, investigate, prosecute, and dismantle transnational criminal organizations and subsidiary organizations within and beyond the United States;
(b) work to improve Federal agencies' provision, collection, reporting, and sharing of, and access to, data relevant to Federal efforts against transnational criminal organizations and subsidiary organizations;
(c) work to increase intelligence and law enforcement information sharing with foreign partners battling transnational criminal organizations and subsidiary organizations, and to enhance international operational capabilities and cooperation;
(d) assess Federal agencies' allocation of monetary and personnel resources for identifying, interdicting, and dismantling transnational criminal organizations and subsidiary organizations, as well as any resources that should be redirected toward these efforts;
(e) identify Federal agencies' practices, any absence of practices, and funding needs that might hinder Federal efforts to effectively combat transnational criminal organizations and subsidiary organizations;
(f) review relevant Federal laws to determine existing ways in which to identify, interdict, and disrupt the activity of transnational criminal organizations and subsidiary organizations, and ascertain which statutory authorities, including provisions under the Immigration and Nationality Act, could be better enforced or amended to prevent foreign members of these organizations or their associates from obtaining entry into the United States and from exploiting the United States immigration system;
(g) in the interest of transparency and public safety, and in compliance with all applicable law, including the Privacy Act, issue reports at least once per quarter detailing convictions in the United States relating to transnational criminal organizations and their subsidiaries;
(h) to the extent deemed useful by the Co-Chairs, and in their discretion, identify methods for Federal agencies to coordinate, as permitted by law, with State, tribal, and local governments and law enforcement agencies, foreign law enforcement partners, public-health organizations, and non governmental organizations in order to aid in the identification, interdiction, and dismantling of transnational criminal organizations and subsidiary organizations;
(i) to the extent deemed useful by the Co-Chairs, and in their discretion, consult with the Office of National Drug Control Policy in implementing this order; and
(j) within 120 days of the date of this order, submit to the President a report on transnational criminal organizations and subsidiary organizations, including the extent of penetration of such organizations into the United States, and issue additional reports annually thereafter to describe the progress made in combating these criminal organizations, along with any recommended actions for dismantling them.
Sec. 4. General Provisions. (a) Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:
(i) the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof; or
(ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.
(b) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.
(c) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.
DONALD J. TRUMP

 

[eleganz]

Trump signs Sessions EO that includes human trafficking.

Are they signaling their intent to go after the pedos?