Claim: Libertarians love Elizabeth Warren

[thoughtomator]

Hate is too strong a word. She's just the latest in a long line of corporatist stooges pretending to be against them. Lenin described the phenomenon.

 

[Spikender]

...unfortunately, i suspect replacing 'elizabeth warren' with 'ted cruz' would have yielded many more 'love him' votes...

...ime, sadly, 'liberty' voters are as clueless as warren voters...

Actually I have a feeling you would've had more "hate him" votes.

Guess one of us needs to start that poll to see who's money's on the right horse.

 

[Ronin Truth]

Folks can CLAIM anything.

 

[muh_roads]

She was against Audit the Fed. Have no interest in her.

 

[Okie RP fan]

I voted "Don't Care" because I simply don't.

I do think she's an imbecile and a typical self-hating nitwit (she's white as can be but tries to act Native American). Typical proggy, though. Nothing to like about them.
They tend to line with us on social issues not because they like liberty, but *usually* because they're so enamored with taking down religious dogma (I'm not going to argue about that, I'm just stating what I believe is many of their reasons for doing what they do).

 

[Carlybee]

Nope. She's a socialist.

 

[presence]

I like Warren. In many ways I think she's spot on with our problems. I think she's naive and foolish with her solutions; in essence she among those that believes regulation can win the arms race against regulatory capture. I disagree. But she's good people. I often cringe but I'll listen and nod at times; between pondering how I'd interject. I'd love for her to come to the side of liberty; she'd be a great ally if she saw the light.

She's among the principled liberals. I disagree wholeheartedly, but I can respect that she's rooted in a philosophy. In general I find the Grayson/Warren/Kucinich/Sanders liberal wing classier than the overtly crony liberal establishment Hillary/Kerry/Biden/Obama crowd.


I'll choose not to vote in the poll.

Warren isn’t wrong to complain that big business has too much influence over public policy.
But that influence isn’t the result of insufficient government intervention.
It’s the result of a government that is too massive and too willing to intrude in free markets.

http://www.againstcronycapitalism.org/2014/12/what-elizabeth-warren-missed-in-her-big-bank-tirade/