Chuck Baldwin money bomb TOMORROW Friday September 26th

[Hamer]

There is a moneybomb set up for Chuck Baldwin this Friday September 26th www.buckforchuck.com let's make a huge impact and show him the revolution supports him. No donation is too small.

We could use help to promote it and we need to raise him money NOW if we are going to have any impact.

Ron Paul has endorsed Chuck Baldwin and he needs our help.

This event is also going to be broadcasted live on www.revolutionbroadcasting.com - www.WRBNFM.com and www.RTRRadio.com it would be nice if it was also broadcasted on BTM.

Will you help us promote this event? Please respond!

I was asked to add this : Revolutionbroadcasting nor buckforchuck or any other radio network or website receives 1 penny from this money bomb 100% of all donations go directly to the Chuck Baldwin campaign.

www.baldwin2008.com

www.buckforchuck.com

 

[mconder]

Help out a good man. Look past his one fault of being Christian. If that's the worst thing that he is, then he's still way better than the rabble in DC running things now.

 

[revolutionisnow]

How much did the last money bomb raise?

 

[Hamer]

Help out a good man. Look past his one fault of being Christian. If that's the worst thing that he is, then he's still way better than the rabble in DC running things now.

I won't look past it I respect his beliefs as do I respect people that believe in no God. Ron Paul is a Christian and his brother is a pastor.

I will vote for chuck and donate Tomorrow during the money bomb.

 

[Hamer]

How much did the last money bomb raise?

I am not sure but let's make this one big

 

[Indy Vidual]

Fine, for people who have tons of money, but...
BJ. Lawson might be a better use of your cash.

 

[RonPaulVolunteer]

Help out a good man. Look past his one fault of being Christian. If that's the worst thing that he is, then he's still way better than the rabble in DC running things now.

His one FAULT? SCREW YOU!!

 

[Hamer]

His one FAULT? SCREW YOU!!

lol

 

[DeadtoSin]

I read "Help out a good man." I feel encouraged because I was thinking that this was going to turn into a trolling topic within the 1st reply.

Then I read your second sentence. You know, I have nothing wrong with people being atheist/agnostic/Muslim/Jew/Christian. I have a problem with angry Christians, angry Muslims, angry atheists, whatever. There are a few atheists on this forum who are terrible in respect to their tolerance of the beliefs of others.

Its interesting to see some of the hardcore libertarians and hardcore atheists on here who are supposedly so open-minded, and I am always amazed that they are only open-minded if you agree with everything they believe. If you don't believe 100% in everything libertarianism has to say then you are a socialist. (If you enslave yourself to a title like libertarianism, then thats being just as much a sheep as anything else.) If you believe in the Christian God and you try to involve your worldview in any way then you are enemy #1.

I'm just curious. How can you expect someone to not involve the views that they base their whole existence on, whether it be steeped in religious beliefs or not? If you expect an atheist's political decisions to not be somehow rooted in his experiences as an atheist, then you are delusional. It seems to me, if you can separate your religious (or lack thereof) from your actions then you have an incredibly shallow worldview.

And let me reiterate, I am not attacking atheism. I know nice atheists who can be civil. In fact, one of my best friends is a gay anarcho-socialist atheist. I'm just frustrated with the kind of Christian/Muslim/Jewish/Atheist/Agnostic people who lash out at people's beliefs and berate them. As of late, there is a group of atheists who are the ones lashing out so I've focused on them.

 

[jmunjr]

His one FAULT? SCREW YOU!!

Would you say it was a fault of Baldwin if he were an Atheist? If so, then your response is not valid. Publicly stating the opinion that being Christian is a fault isn't wise, but the OP is entitled to such an opinion without hostility.

 

[Hamer]

Fine, for people who have tons of money, but...
BJ. Lawson might be a better use of your cash.

Many of us have supported BJ Lawson. Does that mean we should not support Chuck Baldwin now? We should just put all our eggs in 1 candidate will be in 1 district of thousands? You don't knock down one good thing to support another good thing you let the market decide and my decision is on the national scale to continue the message of Ron Paul.

 

[Hamer]

come on all

 

[tmaddox]

Now is the time for freedom!!

Give today!!